I was clearly stating the term international was used, so as to not limit the flights counted as JUST commercial flights, but also count private flights also.
OK....I hope you understand that makes absolutely zero sense in the context of what you said. Be specific in what you mean...abusing the English language is not something to be proud of.
they still said PLAINLY;
1% of people take 20% of International (commercial and private combined) flights .....
OK apparently you aren't bright enough to understand 1% people taking 20% of international flights does not mean "the very rich who own private jets are taking 20% of all international flights". Show me in that article where it mentions rich people flying on private jets anywhere. It doesn't. You just made this up as a defence of your original claim that "the 1% don't fly in cattle cars". As I said they are not referring to "the 1%" but simply a statistic.
My point is based on direct observation, statistics that I've shown regarding the frequency of total flights and length of stay plus rationale based on the sort of time/benefit costs analysis a normal person who wants to go on regular trips to nice warm spots would do. Yours is based on zero data and an interpretation of the press piece that involves nothing more than a misinterpretation of what was written.
If you can explain how you get from 1% of people taking 20% of International to it meaning that it is rich people taking private planes that makes up all of the 1% of people then have at it. Generally when you propose something you back it up with evidence/data etc. Otherwise, you are simply babbling nonsense.