Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Moon Thread pt. 2

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby ian807 » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 17:07:25

zoidberg wrote:No-one was allowed to check closely because of course the moon landings never actually happened. First the original tapes are lost, then they cant find the flag, and no this.

I'm starting to believe it was all a hoax.

Easy to verify. Look at China's map of the moon (http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-11/12/content_10347379.htm) of where we landed. If there's nothing there, we have some evidence of a hoax. If we see an old lunar lander, footprints and some vehicles, we can safely assume the moon landings happened.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 17:28:00

zoidberg wrote:No-one was allowed to check closely because of course the moon landings never actually happened. First the original tapes are lost, then they cant find the flag, and no this.

I'm starting to believe it was all a hoax.


Maybe not all. Just Apollo 11. My faith in the claim of the Apollo 11 landing has eroded a bit.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 17:51:58

eastbay wrote:
zoidberg wrote:No-one was allowed to check closely because of course the moon landings never actually happened. First the original tapes are lost, then they cant find the flag, and no this.

I'm starting to believe it was all a hoax.


Maybe not all. Just Apollo 11. My faith in the claim of the Apollo 11 landing has eroded a bit.
Scientists are still using the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array placed on the moon in 1969. This business of the petrified tree-rock is bizarre, but doesn't mean we did not land on the moon.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby heroineworshipper » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 18:10:48

uh huh. Next post.
People first, then things, then dollars.
There will be enslavement, cannibalism, & zombie invasions.
User avatar
heroineworshipper
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri 14 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Calif*

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 18:35:03

PenultimateManStanding wrote:
eastbay wrote:
zoidberg wrote:No-one was allowed to check closely because of course the moon landings never actually happened. First the original tapes are lost, then they cant find the flag, and no this.

I'm starting to believe it was all a hoax.


Maybe not all. Just Apollo 11. My faith in the claim of the Apollo 11 landing has eroded a bit.
Scientists are still using the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array placed on the moon in 1969. This business of the petrified tree-rock is bizarre, but doesn't mean we did not land on the moon.


I'm not one of those who thinks that the moon landings were a hoax. But someone needs to quiz Buzz Aldrin about his gift of petrified wood.

Wiki

Image

I mean, the rock in question is the kind of thing that a practiced minerologist would glance at and say, "Oh, that's peterified wood".

The piece that Aldrin gave the museum may not have been so obvious as this picture, but still... the rock would have been easily identifiable by anyone with any experience.

No practiced rock hounds at the museum ever peered closely at Aldrin's gift for 40 years?
Carlhole
 

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby FoolYap » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 20:15:47

Carlhole wrote:No practiced rock hounds at the museum ever peered closely at Aldrin's gift for 40 years?


I think a likelier explanation would be that some amateur rock hound working at the museum during the past 40 years performed a switcheroo, and now has a real moon rock in their private collection?

--Steve
User avatar
FoolYap
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: central MA, USA

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 21:18:12

Carlhole wrote: I mean, the rock in question is the kind of thing that a practiced minerologist would glance at and say, "Oh, that's peterified wood".

The piece that Aldrin gave the museum may not have been so obvious as this picture, but still... the rock would have been easily identifiable by anyone with any experience.

No practiced rock hounds at the museum ever peered closely at Aldrin's gift for 40 years?


Image
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby TheDude » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 22:59:34

He's fessed up: Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked

Although Armstrong said he "could have sworn" he felt the effects of zero gravity while soaring out of the Earth's atmosphere and through space, he now believed his memory must be flawed. He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon."

"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."

"This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon."

In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can.


Image
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 23:02:31

TheDude wrote:He's fessed up:


Dude, this isn't a "moon landing were faked" thread.
Carlhole
 

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 31 Aug 2009, 23:11:52




Now THAT was funny! :-D
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby Novus » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 01:19:27

FoolYap wrote:
Carlhole wrote:No practiced rock hounds at the museum ever peered closely at Aldrin's gift for 40 years?


I think a likelier explanation would be that some amateur rock hound working at the museum during the past 40 years performed a switcheroo, and now has a real moon rock in their private collection?

--Steve


-> The real rock was probably stolen.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 02:57:24

Carlhole wrote:
TheDude wrote:He's fessed up:


Dude, this isn't a "moon landing were faked" thread.

So do you believe that Armstrong was on the Moon?
Apparently he doesn't...
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7377
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00


Re: We NEVER Went to the Moon--NASA Lied To Us

Unread postby SFDukie » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 16:06:49

BigTex wrote:I'm surprised so many are frustrated that this topic has been raised. If it's false, then what harm will discussing it cause?
How are crazy ideas supposed to get sorted out except by talking through the different points of view? If you can't discuss it in the PO.com Open Forum where can you discuss it?

I wish that there were some photos of the Moon's surface from the earth or satellite telescopes that showed the landing spots and the gear they left behind. As I understand it, the Hubble telescope does not provide enough resolution to provide these kinds of images. But to be clear, I believe that the Moon landings occurred.
Subsequent to this post, there are such photos now.
Image

Explanation re resolution from Hubble, and statement re coming Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/11jul_lroc.htm

LRO pictures:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html
SFDukie
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed 10 Jun 2009, 18:19:58

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 19:08:55

You guys are missing the obvious explanation. Maybe there's petrified wood on the moon. :razz:
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby eastbay » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 20:26:21

I have come to the sad conclusion that the moon does not even exist. :cry:
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Moon Mission Discussion

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 21:06:17

Ah, I'm glad we got that loop closed.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby Caffeine » Tue 01 Sep 2009, 21:11:54

Heh.

Seriously, some major media outlet should go and have a couple other moon rocks in museums analyzed. Not only would it provide further support for the "Yes, Virginia, we really DID go to the moon" idea, I think you could easily get enough viewers to tune in and learn what moon rock is actually made of. It'd be an educational thing. Especially if you did it on Discovery Channel or one of the similar channels. I don't watch much TV, but I'd probably watch the show.

Somehow, though, I don't think any major news outlet would do that.
Caffeine
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Moon Mission Discussion

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Wed 02 Sep 2009, 03:26:23

BigTex wrote:Ah, I'm glad we got that loop closed.

These photos are from Apollo 14...
Maybe Apollo 11 was just an unmanned mission?

After all it is recently reported that Armstrong personally doesn't believe that he was there.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/co ... inces_neil

Maybe only latter visits were real?
Or maybe none 8O 8O 8O
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7377
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood

Unread postby dorlomin » Wed 02 Sep 2009, 05:07:24

"Famed “Moon Rock” Turns Out to Be Hunk of Petrified Wood"


So what scared it?



IGMC
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests