KaiserJeep wrote:If permaculture is to persist, then the labor of one farmer must feed 30 people. Which sounds like a lot, but represents only about 1% of the 3000 or so people fed by a modern mechanized farmer.
Do the numbers. We have to feed 350 million people without cheap oil for tilling, fertilizer, pesticides, etc.
Even then, the numbers of people and the arable land devoted to permaculture must be scaled upwards 100X from where we are today. Else it is not a viable solution.
Shaved Monkey wrote:If digging is going to be the hardship I suggest no dig.
Here is a garden in France based on Permaculture principles green manure and no dig.
The worms do all the digging its your job to keep them happy and well fed with green manures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy_x5rXq19g
She based her techniques on Masanobu Fukuoka The One Straw Revolution
the art of non-cultivation and do-nothing, natural farming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSKSxLHMv9k
Shaved Monkey wrote:Maybe that's how agriculture will work in the future.
People who can ,grow their expensive perishables, people who cant, buy them and let big Ag grow the grains and oils.
Quinny wrote:Loki - asking to see the balance sheet of a Permaculture holding kinda defeats the object in a way. They are bound to be more labour intensive than ff driven agriculture because of the higher labour content needed. Yield however is a different measure. Most permaculture projects produce attractive yields with less input and do so on an on-going basis.
Loki wrote:Quinny wrote:Loki - asking to see the balance sheet of a Permaculture holding kinda defeats the object in a way. They are bound to be more labour intensive than ff driven agriculture because of the higher labour content needed. Yield however is a different measure. Most permaculture projects produce attractive yields with less input and do so on an on-going basis.
If the alleged yield increase outweighs the increased labor input, balance sheet should be positive. But if there is no balance sheet, we're talking about gardening, not farming.
Gardening is fun and all that, and part of the answer to the food problem, but as I said, gardening and farming are two different beasts, and some of us still need to make a living in the real world. I have yet to see a permie acolyte address this. They seem to have all the answers, except for this question, apparently.
pstarr wrote:I have a BCS 720. Three speeds forward (high speed only for hauling on a road), one reverse. Powered takeoff. I own a tiller, flail mower, and 1,000lb.-load cart.Loki wrote:Walk-behind tractors are vastly superior to a hoe or horse-drawn plow---these could probably be electrified with a bit more ease than your average 200 hp combine. Recharge the batteries with solar. Only problem is the farmer would have to pray for both rain and sun simultaneously
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests