Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on January 19, 2020
On the Climate Road to Serfdom
The political world is saying “no” to policies that make energy less available, more expensive, less reliable, and more intrusive. Hyperbole of peak demand is going the way of Peak Oil as the hydrocarbon production boom creates its own demand.
Little wonder that compared to 1988 when global warming became a political issue, U.S. fossil-fuel consumption has grown 13 percent despite generous government subsidies to ethanol, wind power, and solar power.
“Democracies are ill-suited to deal with climate change”
In fact, growth in carbon-based energies in the last 30 years almost matches the total production of these three subsidized renewables, according to statistics compiled by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Overall, the market share of carbon-based energy is a robust 80 percent US and 85 percent globally. This percentage will increase, not decrease, should subsidy fatigue and grassroots pushback against land-intensive solar and wind installations grow.
But rather than check their premises (mineral energies are winning for inherent reasons), climate activists find themselves arguing not only against market capitalism but also democracy and the self-interested preferences of everyday people.
“Capitalism is destroying the Earth,” a columnist in The Guardian states. “Ending climate change requires the end of capitalism,” another Guardian piece exclaims. But this is only the beginning.
Edward Luce, US national editor of the Financial Times, opines that “Democracies are ill-suited to deal with climate change.” Harvard University’s Naomi Oreskes recently recommended a media blackout of industry views in favor of those of climate activists.
“The fossil-fuel industry exploited the journalistic ideals of fairness, objectivity and particularly the idea of balance to manipulate journalists into presenting what was essentially propaganda,” Oreskes argues. Censorship is called for.
All previous electronic media – radio, telephone, television – have been regulated. There’s absolutely no reason why this newest form should not be regulated. And people who cry “free speech! free speech!” are ignoring history.
Short of censorship, fooling the public seems to be part of the climate playbook
So who would regulate the regulators? Imagine all the lobbying shops in Washington, DC, determining what can be said about climate physics, climate models, and climate economics—and “good” energy and climate policy.
Short of censorship, fooling the public seems to be part of the climate playbook. Climatologist/activist Andrew Dessler tweeted:
Economists love transparency. Rational actors want to know exactly how much everything is costing them so they can make optimal decisions about allocating resources. In politics, though, transparency is a negative. If you open your electricity bill and it says “Carbon tax: $20”, it’s hard to argue that it’s not costing you $20.
A politician can then come along and say, “This $20 tax is killing our economy and costing us jobs — we need to repeal it” and a lot of people will agree. That makes it hard to enact and sustain such a policy.
From a political standpoint, a more opaque policy is actually superior [because] … you have no idea how much it costs. Politicians can argue that it’s costing a lot, but other people can argue the opposite … who’s right?
Opaque policies should be easier to enact and safer once implemented. I think economist’s love of market-based solutions to climate needs to meet the reality of politics.
Can a political candidate or party be honest and open given the pay-now proposition of regulating carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions? “I don’t know how you talk about it and be truthful and also win votes,” lamented one professor of environmental politics.
Dangerous Worldview
The above goosesteps down the climate road to serfdom is not new. Back in 1954, ecologist Harrison Brown opined:
It seems clear that the first major penalty man will have to pay for his rapid consumption of the earth’s nonrenewable resources will be that of having to live in a world where his thoughts and actions are ever more strongly limited, where social organization has become all pervasive, complex, and inflexible, and where the state completely dominates the actions of the individual.
This quotation, resurrected by Paul and Anne Ehrlich and John Holdren in their 1973 treatise, Human Ecology (p. 388), is but one example of the Malthusian/neo-Malthusian virus that has predicted doom for mankind against the alleged limits to nature for centuries.
A Better View
Free-market wealth-is-health and market anticipation of and adaptation to weather extremes and changing climate, natural or anthropogenic, is the clear direction for energy and climate policy.
Julian Simon noted that “human creation is greater than human destruction, in the sense that our environment is becoming progressively more hospitable to humankind.” Continuing:
The movement away from equilibrium is a movement toward safety and sustenance. The progress carries with it some undesirable features for a while, but eventually we get around to fixing them.
Alex Epstein has also emphasized in The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels (p. 126) how “the popular climate discussion has the issue backward.”
It looks at man as a destructive force for climate livability, one who makes the climate dangerous because we use fossil fuels. In fact, the truth is the exact opposite; we don’t take a safe climate and make it dangerous; we take a dangerous climate and make it safe. High-energy civilization, not climate, is the driver of climate livability.
In fact, the statistics of weather, climate, and general welfare indicate that the world is getting better, not worse, for the great majority of people. Climate-related deaths have fallen precipitously in the last century, a time when atmospheric CO2 concentrations increased by nearly one-third. In terms of general human progress, the last decade was particularly remarkable.
Conclusion
The alarmists are just about out of tricks in their quixotic quest to substitute inferior, stifling energies for better ones—and give government carte blanche in the process.
It is high time to exit the climate road to serfdom. Would-be President Bernie Sanders might be ready to nationalize the energy industry, while climate campaigners lobby to restrict free speech and otherwise try to fool voters. But for civil libertarians, economic conservatives, and classical liberals, exposure, education, and denunciation are in order.
18 Comments on "On the Climate Road to Serfdom"
Sissyfuss on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 9:09 am
Another short term and anthropomorphic view from the business as usualers. Everything keeps getting better cause we don’t need no stinking environment, we got money.
The Reel Donald on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:34 am
Cannuk Free Press – LOL. what a bunch of freemarket fascist propaganda.
Richard Guunette on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:37 am
The above is a juanPee sock
More Davy ID Fraud on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:40 am
Richard Guunette on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:37 am
Richard Guunette on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:57 am
I love muzzie coq. If I’m denied of smelly foul muzzie coq I’d commit suicide like whitey supertard John Brady when muzzie akbar sayeed denied him of his muzzie coq.
Claes on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 12:01 pm
The above is obviously juanPee because he is a fagot.
Claes on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 12:09 pm
Will the lemon party feature muzzie coq?
If yes, I’m so in.
More Davy ID Fraud on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 1:11 pm
Richard Guunette on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:57 am
Claes on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 12:01 pm
Claes on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 12:09 pm
Richard Guenette on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 2:49 pm
Tax the rich- make these useless parasites pay their fair share (by 50% or more).
Harquebus on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 4:33 pm
“But humans won’t die out. With enough money, we are extremely adaptable.”
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it-are-we-on-the-brink-of-a-mass-extinction-20191015-p530vy.html
More Davy sock puppetry on Thu, 23rd Jan 2020 9:22 pm
The Reel DAVYskum on Mon, 20th Jan 2020 11:34 am
As part of my faux ‘fair and balanced’ routine, I use a stupid sock name to criticize Kanada. This way, I to get spray my goat poop all over Kanada, even though it is a loyal colony and all, mostly, while keeping up my facade of fairness and balance. Even though in reality, I am as far from either of those qualities as you can possibly get. Clever. Of me, not you.
Theedrich on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 3:47 am
Humans can adapt? Yup, Negroes move to Whiteyland. Ditto, for all of the other non-Whites. Whitey alone should not adapt and should go extinct, according to a mentally disturbed Swedish teenager. The BigJew media and Yid-sucking elites who control the masses in Europe propagate the same message, as does Papa Frank in the Vatican. White genosuicidism is all the rage. Despotism is absolutely necessary, so that Caucasians can be extinguished as a race and non-Whites can take over. Just ask Sörös and Co. Or Angela the Sow (Frau Sauer, aka Merkel).
As America sinks into psychosis with its wars to remake the world in the image of the imperialists, as vast numbers drift off into narco-heavens, and millions of useless eaters demand freebies from “society,” the nation is becoming ever weaker vis-a-vis Russia and China, and even tiny North Korea. The idea that simply starving adversaries with economic “sanctions” will somehow make Yankeeland the global emperor is delusional. Those adversaries will simply band together and develop more and more nukes.
America has not suffered war on its territory since 1865, and that was a totally different situation. As asinine as the North was in declaring war on the Confederacy, it “won” and did not suffer total annihilation, which is what we are facing today. In Europe, Russia has about 7,000 “mini-nukes” targeted on NATO missile and other military sites. Those weapons are not included in any treaty whatsoever. If the Dr. Strangeloves in the Pentagon and the Council on Foreign Relations decide to do anything funny — like starting one proxy war too many — we may find out what extinction means. Much sooner than the anti-Whites expect.
Alert for DAVY on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 8:39 am
Davy,
I sure as hell hope that you are not dabbling with porn.
Your profile was created from your many posts and the law enforcement analyst says that with a 77% confidence level you have at some time, although not actively, visited porn sites.
Man, you had better be damn careful otherwise you gonna find yourself in lockup.
Attn: Theedrich on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 8:49 am
Theedrich:
Get with it, man. Stop banging your head against the wall again and again and again.
There’s a wise old saying that says, “If you can’t beat them, then you might as well join them.”
So, in a few generations everybody will be the color of chocolate while existing in a “narco-heaven” state of euphoria. That’s not so scary, eh?
Enjoy the Silence, so said Depeche Mode.
<<<<>>>> Peace // Out <<<<>>>>
supremacist muzzies jerk on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 9:43 am
supertard theedirich may I have your pledge of support
6 days to world muzzie bag day
45 days to world grater nedertrdland day
world beervirus day today and short term
put a shopping back over your head when you drive or go out to show your solidarity with supremacist muzzies. cover your private parts with maple leaf
thnks
Theedrich on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 3:33 pm
I don’t pledge to support
6 days to world grater muzzie bag day
I would rather cooperate with muzzie to push my white supremacist agenda
supremacist muzzies jerk on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 3:35 pm
supertards, may i have your pledge of support for supremacist muzzies:
6 days to world muzzie bag day
45 days to world grater nedertrdland day
world beervirus day today and short term
put a shopping bag over your head when you drive or go out to show your solidarity with supremacist muzzies. cover your private parts with maple leaf
thnks
Cloggie on Sat, 25th Jan 2020 3:56 pm
“45 days to world grater nedertrdland day”
I pledge support brother!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Groot-Nederland_in_Europa.PNG