timmac wrote:I understand the problems with BP and the spill but Boycotting them or Banning them I find hard to swallow when no one speaks out about Boycotting Saudi Arabia's oil when there is tons of proff that the are funding our enemies and killing American military personal and civilian citizens...Saudi officials are also reported to send explosives and weapons to the terrorist groups.
Meanwhile, Secretary General of the Saudi National Security Council Prince Bandar Bin Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz is said to be the main guilty behind the case.
The report came as earlier last week, Saudi army officer Abdullah al-Qahtani was arrested in Iraq over charges of planning a terrorist attack during the upcoming FIFA World Cup in South Africa.
http://peakoil.com/publicpolicy/saudi-k ... ence-leak/
dohboi wrote:And what is the reason for some on these forums downplaying the rate of the flow?
dohboi wrote:And what is the reason for some ... downplaying the rate of the flow?
Cog wrote:Why does nuking the well even approach a rational approach to shutting down this oil leak?
Its not going to happen. Its pure tinfoil to even suggest it will. The relief wells will stop the flow 2 months hence and its a tried method that works.
May 11 (Bloomberg) -- BP Plc faces the risk of an even bigger oil spill as it attempts to drill two so-called relief wells to plug a leak on the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico that’s gushing 5,000 barrels a day into the ocean.
The relief wells will pump cement into the leak to seal it. To do that, BP will need to first drill into the same deposit of oil and gas that caused a pressure surge known as a blowout at the original well, igniting an explosion that killed 11 workers and sank a $365 million drilling rig.
In a regulatory filing BP made to drill the relief wells it estimates another blowout could release as much as 240,000 barrels of oil a day into the ocean. That’s almost 50 percent more than the company’s worst-case estimate for the first well and equivalent to two-thirds of supply pumped daily from Prudhoe Bay, the largest U.S. oil field.
When detailing the risks in the filing, BP may have factored in the volatile conditions found when drilling the original well that blew up on April 20, said Fred Aminzadeh, a research professor at the University of Southern California.
timmac wrote:But boycotting them now will do no good, at least let them try and finish the job..
timmac wrote:How bout we stop selling all grain to all foreign countries and turn all that grain into fuel, Iam game are you...........
Pretorian wrote:The question that should be is " How do you boycot BP?" Many of the BP-brand gas-stations are locally-owned, but ok, the owners if they chose it. Dont they sell gas to many different stations? Do they own other brands?
The Trans-Alaska Pipeline, partly owned by BP (BP.L: Quote, Profile, Research), shut down on Tuesday after spilling several thousand barrels of crude oil, drastically cutting supply out of Alaska's oilfields.
mattduke wrote:The Trans-Alaska Pipeline, partly owned by BP (BP.L: Quote, Profile, Research), shut down on Tuesday after spilling several thousand barrels of crude oil, drastically cutting supply out of Alaska's oilfields.
http://in.reuters.com/article/governmen ... 2320100526
dohboi wrote:I say give the poor guys a break--they were only off by a piddling two orders of magnitude--what's the big deal?
[/sarconol]
And this is considered "reasonable" rational sober judgment, while Simmons claiming it could be just ~ 50% above present levels is considered "hysterical."
Cog is hysterical, too, but more in a rotglmao kind of way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests