Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Afghanistan Thread Pt 2 (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 15:33:38

Well, they got what they deserved.
Alien invading force.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7364
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 16:03:17

mattduke wrote:
31 US troops die in Afghanistan; many from unit that killed bin Laden. 7 Afghan commandos are also killed; Chinook crash appears to be deadliest single incident in the decade-long war

+7 others, but nobody gives a shit about Afghans.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44043847/ns ... ?gt1=43001


There was also a dog. Anyway, it looks to me like the rest of the bin Laden kill team will have accidents on a one by one basis.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 16:04:05

EnergyUnlimited wrote:Well, they got what they deserved.
Alien invading force.


What about the dog?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby davep » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 16:09:05

Pretorian wrote:
EnergyUnlimited wrote:Well, they got what they deserved.
Alien invading force.


What about the dog?


Not the old 'following orders' excuse? :evil: :lol:
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4578
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 16:20:42

Cue the conspiracy theorists claiming Bin Laden isn't dead.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 16:58:06

PrestonSturges wrote:Cue the conspiracy theorists claiming Bin Laden isn't dead.


most likely this USA's collaborator died a very long time ago. If if you claim that less likely outcome is true, then I'd like to see a proof.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Alan Cain » Sat 06 Aug 2011, 18:04:47

Oh, dear. I think this is very sad; in my more paranoid moments (more all the time) I said to myself, "Self, whatcha wanna bet that seal team six is going to disappear soon?" and I replied, "Go get your Valium, idiot."

Now I have to change my internal dialog. That really is annoying. Want a Valium? I have a few left.
Remember that in a population group, the number of individuals that are below average is equal to (the total number, divided by two), minus one. And that one is not swift.
User avatar
Alan Cain
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2011, 00:26:16

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Sun 07 Aug 2011, 03:52:03

EnergyUnlimited wrote:Well, they got what they deserved.
Alien invading force.


That was uncalled for. Please apologize to the families.
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: THE Afghanistan Thread (merged)

Unread postby mattduke » Sun 14 Aug 2011, 09:24:42

Notice that according to MSM headlines, the seal team six members died in a helicopter "crash", not that their helicopter was "shot down."

SEAL Team Six: Obama honors troops killed in helicopter crash
Helicopter Crash in Afghanistan Reportedly Kills Members of SEAL Team 6


http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/08/06 ... pter-crash
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2 ... pter-crash
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 20 From Seal Team Six Die +11 Others

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sun 14 Aug 2011, 23:42:58

EnergyUnlimited wrote:Well, they got what they deserved.
They don't worry about those quaint old Geneva Conventions.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: THE Afghanistan Thread (merged)

Unread postby americandream » Mon 15 Aug 2011, 00:38:16

Once upon a time we were all barbaric and fought over all manner of things. Hopefully, we progress and gradually improve our cumulative lot. After all, life is brief.

Afghanistan has been held back from any real progress towards a more civil society and has not essentially moved past the very first stirrings of the extremes that have bedevilled it from it's first encounter with Arab Islam. The '80's saw further injections of this Abrahamic primevalism when the region was used to fight an ideological war, with a fair injection of Koran irrationalism, subsidised graciously by the Saudis. This is a country in which former allies are now slogging it out for all manner of quite narrow reasons. The long term effects is that generations will continue to suffer under extremes of backwardness and poverty.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby mattduke » Sat 20 Aug 2011, 22:46:45

America and Afghanistan are close to signing a strategic pact which would allow thousands of United States troops to remain in the country until at least 2024, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

The longest war in American history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -2024.html
Last edited by Ferretlover on Sun 21 Aug 2011, 00:13:51, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged thread.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Bill Hicks » Sat 20 Aug 2011, 23:04:01

Well, we still have troops in Germany and Japan 66 years after the last shot was fired in WW2, and troops in Korea 58 years after that war ended.

So this is hardly surprising. :badgrin:
Check out The Downward Spiral (A Requiem for the American Dream):

http://billhicksisdead.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Bill Hicks
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2011, 22:22:16
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 20 Aug 2011, 23:34:09

True. HOWEVER, we are bankrupt (the PTB just won't admit it).

So, I don't mind us doing this with a VOLUNTEER army -- but IF AND ONLY IF:

a). The country we are working with basically approves of our presence instead of hating us and wanting to kill any Americans they can.
b). The country we are in PAYS FOR IT. PAYS FOR EVERYTHING that is OUR cost. We send them a, say, monthly bill for "mercenary services". When the bill gets to some pre-agreed time overdue - we pack up and leave.


I can imagine the ground shaking from all the frantic GOP jumping up and down about this -- the same GOP that HATES government spending, programs, etc. BTW.

Since we ARE bankrupt -- this would let us maintain our global presence (which the GOP wants so badly) to some extent, yet not bankrupt us. (We'll do that job just fine with social programs anyway). :roll:

So, as a "broad brush" compromise principle -- why wouldn't this be a place to begin some serious negotiations toward a sustainable military policy?

...

(And by the way -- I DO realize you can't start this without meaningful warning / lead time. Say 5 years.)

And before the GOPers say "well, NATO, etc. can't afford it" -- neither can we! And do you really think France and Canada can, say, face down a Nuclear Iran without our help?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Bill Hicks » Sat 20 Aug 2011, 23:48:40

Outcast_Searcher wrote:True. HOWEVER, we are bankrupt (the PTB just won't admit it).

So, I don't mind us doing this with a VOLUNTEER army -- but IF AND ONLY IF:

a). The country we are working with basically approves of our presence instead of hating us and wanting to kill any Americans they can.
b). The country we are in PAYS FOR IT. PAYS FOR EVERYTHING that is OUR cost. We send them a, say, monthly bill for "mercenary services". When the bill gets to some pre-agreed time overdue - we pack up and leave.


Problem is, most countries want our troops there BECAUSE of the financial benefits it brings. Germany and Japan, for example. The moment we started charging them, they'd kick our butts out so fast there would barely be time to load up the C-130s.

Not a bad idea, actually. 8)
Check out The Downward Spiral (A Requiem for the American Dream):

http://billhicksisdead.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Bill Hicks
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2011, 22:22:16
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 21 Aug 2011, 00:02:34

You know what.. Her Majesty's old Empire ain't got nothin' on us..

When Uncle Sam moves in, he's there to stay.. FOREVER..

Image
Image
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sun 21 Aug 2011, 00:04:47

Outcast_Searcher wrote:a). The country we are working with basically approves of our presence instead of hating us and wanting to kill any Americans they can.
You invaded these countries because they they fought back against your meddling in their part of the world. They are not likely to pay you to continue to attack them.

Outcast_Searcher wrote:b). The country we are in PAYS FOR IT. PAYS FOR EVERYTHING that is OUR cost. We send them a, say, monthly bill for "mercenary services". When the bill gets to some pre-agreed time overdue - we pack up and leave.
Good luck with that in Afghanistan. I understand that most of their GNP comes from spending by the US occupiers (eg., Afghan "security" companies that pay off the Taliban to carry out their attacks in other parts of the country). Somebody said the war must go on because Afghanistan would go broke if it ended. 8O
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: US Troops In Afghanistan Until 2024

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 04 Dec 2011, 06:42:19

Sixstrings wrote:You know what.. Her Majesty's old Empire ain't got nothin' on us..

When Uncle Sam moves in, he's there to stay.. FOREVER..


Funny thing is the British said the same thing, so did the Spanish before them and the Muslims before them and the Mongols before them and the Romans before them. Forever tends to be a brief time in the real world as Empires come and go.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17059
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: THE Afghanistan Thread (merged)

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sun 04 Dec 2011, 09:06:13

Afghanistan is Hadrian’s Wall. We will retreat.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: THE Afghanistan Thread (merged)

Unread postby Margarethe » Sun 04 Dec 2011, 09:35:39

Excuse, can you please explain the context of Hadrian's wall? Thanks.
Margarethe
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2011, 23:47:55

PreviousNext

Return to Asia Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest