KevO wrote:55mph. It has to be.
35Kas wrote:I think there are cars that are very efficient at 65-75mph...
mos6507 wrote:There are some cars that are more efficient on the freeway. Corvettes are notorious for that, but that's an exception, not the rule.35Kas wrote:I think there are cars that are very efficient at 65-75mph...
gollum wrote:I would like to see it back to 65, then we (my wife and I) can drive at 55-60 without causing a huge accident, and those that want to go 70 can do so without much consequence. The problem with us driving 55-60 is that we are a hazard because people pass us at 80-85.
frankthetank wrote:The cops around here are so busy with domestic cases, that they don't have time to be running radar. They also our under staffed (patrol). Lots of "chiefs" who sit in the station doing nothing while the "indians" are out doing the real work.
smallpoxgirl wrote:Telling a Montanan to drive 55mph is just slightly below trying to take away their guns. Things are far apart out here. There are people out here for whom "Going in to town" means driving several hundred miles. That takes A LOT longer at 55 than it does at 75.
If you feel some irrepressible need to meddle with things, here's what you do: A: You raise the gasoline tax to where it covers all the societal costs of automobile travel. B: You raise the fleet average CAFE standard to 40+ mpg. The speed of travel will sort itself out.
this is 2008. Cops don't do speeders. Digital cameras do.
80% of all speeding fines in the Uk are now from roadside cameras
gollum wrote:If I find one of these unattended, where I can reach it I will destroy it. I will not tolerate living in a police state and will resist where I am able.this is 2008. Cops don't do speeders. Digital cameras do. 80% of all speeding fines in the Uk are now from roadside cameras
Newer, digital speed cameras involve pairs (or networks) of cameras set at long distances apart. As vehicles pass between the cameras their average speed is calculated. If a vehicle is travelling faster than a pre-set threshold, its details and a colour image are digitally recorded. Digital cameras can send this information directly to a computer which generates the penalty notices.
A survey carried out by Car Parts Direct has revealed that over 268,000 drivers are now banned from driving and millions of pounds are being paid out in speeding fines. Thousands of motorists are losing their jobs, freedom and ability to earn a living. 82% of speed camera victims thought they were driving safely at the time of their conviction and were just unfortunate to be doing a few miles over the limit. 65% thought their speeding ticket was totally unjustified and felt cheated.
According to the latest studies, Britain has a staggering 4.2million CCTV cameras - one for every 14 people in the country - and 20 per cent of cameras globally. It has been calculated that each person is caught on camera an average of 300 times daily.
Use of spy cameras in modern-day Britain is now a chilling mirror image of Orwell's fictional world, created in the post-war Forties in a fourth-floor flat overlooking Canonbury Square in Islington, North London.
On the wall outside his former residence - flat number 27B - where Orwell lived until his death in 1950, an historical plaque commemorates the anti-authoritarian author. And within 200 yards of the flat, there are 32 CCTV cameras, scanning every move.
mos6507 wrote:Driving is a privilege, not a right. And I assume you aren't doing something personal like receiving a BJ in your car that you wouldn't want to be on a security camera. I don't like the cameras either. In fact I got caught going through a red light at like 3AM once, but I don't think they are a sign of 1984. The old addage "no cop, no stop" is over, and it's probably for our own good. There is no honor in breaking traffic laws.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest