janser wrote: Does any one has any toughts on this, and some more advice on wich country is best to live in, when peak oil hits us?
Nano wrote:It appears that nuclear energy is the only realistic alternative of holland,
Clementi wrote:Nano, if you are saying that nuclear energy is the only viable alternative you're seriously misquoting the article, or at least the part published on the website. The part on the site ends with the sentence "Toch zal niemand op voorhand hebben gedacht dat er op de Noordzee voldoende ruimte is om ons land op de been te houden." Roughly translated this means "Anyhow, no one would have thought beforehand that there would be enough room on the North Sea to keep our country going". This is very different from what you put in your posting and means that I will be very sceptical on any information you will contribute to this forum.
Jordi Huisman wrote at 08.12.2004
Hello, For the Dutch engineering magazine "The Engineer" I'm currently working on an article about nuclear energy.
It's about how efficient it is in relation with the surface it requires. In other words: how much land surface is needed to produce (for example) 1 MWh of power using state of the art technology.
I hope you can help on this.
Kind regards
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests