Cog wrote:Nature is neither kind nor is it gentle. Why should humans subjugate their nature to be something they are not?
Cog wrote:Nature is neither kind nor is it gentle. Why should humans subjugate their nature to be something they are not?
Newfie wrote:Ms. Newfie here:
Nature on the whole is not gentle, but it has gentle sides, especially in social animals. The very beginning of mammals encompasses an artificially gentle environment (the womb) to protect the complicated fetus, and the cognitive elites amongst animals are socially cooperative. “The Social Conquet of Earth” makes the point how at least intra-group cooperation fosters evolutionary advantages in biological systems. It even seems that some advanced, self-learning robots develop rudimentary cooperative (gentle) behavior because it makes their environment more predictable which makes their learning easier. (Ein Waelsung kuendet Dir das)
ralfy wrote:After that, they become ambitious again.
Cog wrote:No one understands a single sentence of what you have posted evilgenius. I feel I'm dumber for even trying to comprehend it.
Cog wrote:The ideal number of humans is the number we have currently. The planet, and our ability to exploit those planetary resources, will let us know if the current number is no longer ideal.
Cog wrote:The ideal number of humans is the number we have currently. The planet, and our ability to exploit those planetary resources, will let us know if the current number is no longer ideal.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests