onlooker wrote:I do not consider that animosity between the Sovient Uniion and the United States as all that genuiene. I think in fact that mostly the US gave this impression that it was in a true fierce ideological struggle with the USSR. It did so to have the pretext to build up its dominant military and expand its ambitions of Empire around the world. I know some here would enter into heated debate about this with me. But it is just my viewpoint from knowing all the many actions and operations undertaken by the US to assure its hegemony in relations to all other countries. So, this Deep State is truly the Military-Industrial Complex overseen by the most powerful economic players in the planet ie. Banks and Transnational Corporations and economically potent Families who own so much around the world. As they say follow the money trail. The Rich and Powerful have endeavored to remain the cream of the crop.
vtsnowedin wrote:Deputy FBI director McCabe out early.
Maybe there is something in that Memo that is coming out that puts him in a bad light.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... wn-n842176
Plantagenet wrote:
The whole Russian-Trump collusion story turns out to be a false flag operation carried out by the Obama administration. First the CIA and FBI PLANTED the story, and then they "investigated" the phony story that they themselves had planted.
W O W !
pstarr wrote:Planty, I don't see how the New York Times could publish this story at the same time holding onto its 2-year BS campaign and conspiracy theory . . . that Trump and Russia colluded to destroy Hillary's presidential bid.
How is that all reconciled?
Outcast_Searcher wrote:Why don't we wait for what Mueller finds re actual evidence, and see if Trump committed actual crimes which can be proven?
Cog wrote:This was part of Peter Strozk's insurance policy in play in the event Trump was elected. Which was not supposed to happen.
Plantagenet wrote:Outcast_Searcher wrote:Why don't we wait for what Mueller finds re actual evidence, and see if Trump committed actual crimes which can be proven?
In case you haven't noticed, we've already been waiting a year for Mueller to prove anything about Trump.
IMHO after a year its not unreasonable to wonder what in heck Mueller is doing, especially after the blockbuster reports by the NY Times and WaPo just today showing that the supposed contact of a Trump campaign advisor with the Russians was actually with an FBI spy----and it was all initiated by the spy. The FBI spy invited the poor guy to London, paid for him to travel, and told him the Russians had dirt on Hilalry. BUT IT WAS THE FBI SPY SAYING IT---NOT THE RUSSIANS.
Thats called entrapment. And that has major implication for Mueller and his investigation.
Mueller charged the poor guy the FBI spy entrapped with perjury for lying about his contacts with the Russians----but there never were any Russians---there was only the FBI spy lying to Pappadopalous about Russians.
Basically the FBI is charging a guy for lying to the FBI about being lied to by the FBI.
According the the NY Times there were no Russians involved at all----it was all just the FBI setting the guy up with a fake story so the Obama administration could embroil the Trump campaign in a phony FBI investigation to help Hilalry.
I'll bet you the Mueller people never told Pappadopolous that his supposed contact with the "Russians" was actually with an FBI spy. In turns out in the US justice system the govemrent isn't allow to cover things up---they have to give all relevant information to the DEFENSE. IF Mueller never informed this guy about the FBI spy then Mueller has destroyed his own case----the prosecution can't hide relevant facts from the DEFENSE. The case will have to reopened and then thrown out of court for prosecutorial misconduct by Mueller and his team of crack D lawyers and Hilalry supporters.
Chances are everything Mueller has done will have to be reversed and thrown out of court, because the existence of the FBI spy wasn't disclosed to the defendant. This is major misconduct on the part of the Mueller and his D lawyers----and Mueller's case against Pappadopulous will have to thrown out of court due to prosecutorial misconduct.
A similar same problem exists in Mueller Flynn prosecution. The FBI agents who did the interview believed that Flynn was telling the truth. But then Mueller indicated Flynn for perjury. How much do you want to bet that Mueller never reveled to Flynn that the FBI agents who interviewed believed he was telling the truth? That is highly relevant. Can you imagine a perjury trail where the defendant brings in the FBI agents he is charged with lying to and they testify under oath they didn't think he was lying? BY keeping this critical fact secret Mueller has committed prosecutorial misconduct in that case as well, and there is a fair chance the Flynn guilty plea will be reversed or the case thrown entirely out of court due to Mueller's misconduct in that case as well.
Face facts---the whole "Russian Collusion" story is just a false flag operation run by high level political appointees in the Obama administration to try to destroy Trump. The Mueller investigation is the coverup trying deflect attention from the fact that the whole the whole "Russian Collusion" story is just a false flag operation run by high level political appointees in the Obama administration.
Cheers!
Plantagenet wrote:Ask yourself....what kind of prosecutor makes a big show of indicting people and then is afraid to actually go to trial?
robert-mueller-investigation-disaster
Outcast_Searcher wrote:why should a prosecutor go to trial before he's built the whole case
Plantagenet wrote:Outcast_Searcher wrote:why should a prosecutor go to trial before he's built the whole case
If Mueller hasn't 'built the whole case' yet, then why did he file charges and make a big show of going on TV?
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests