vtsnowedin wrote:Well if things are as bad as you say they are you should dig yourself a hole six feet deep by five feet long and five feet wide placing the excavated dirt above the hole so that the next rain will wash the dirt back in. Then at the opportune time you should enter the hole and crouch down in a fetal position then hyper extend your neck so you can kiss your arse goodbye.
This is your answer? Seriously? What a total cop out.
If things are as bad as I say they are, you should want to know. But instead you bury your head in the sand like an ostrich. You won't accept the truth if it conflicts with your fondest hopes and dreams. You are in massive denial.
http://www.feasta.org/wp-content/upload ... e-Off1.pdf
Collectively, it is like we are passengers traveling in an unimaginably complex plane locked onto a perilous course. Our understanding of the engine and guidance system is partial, nor do we know many of the connections between them. We may want to change course by retooling the guidance system, but there’s a meaningful risk it will stall the engine, and we’ll plummet to the ground. Good risk management might argue that before repairs are done, we ensure the passengers have parachutes, but time is running out, maybe it already has.
~David Korowicz
What about trying to argue against the ideas presented in the Korowicz paper? Afraid to try?
---Futilitist