RedJake wrote:I would love specops ability to provoke this kind of vitriol.
Right - lets not turn this into an abortion debate.
I second that. Specop007 is a conservative troll and should be banned. If this forum was being properly run he would have been banned years ago.
Macsporan wrote:I second that. Specop007 is a conservative troll and should be banned. If this forum was being properly run he would have been banned years ago.
seahorse wrote:Reagonomics? Trickle Down? The common man knows that the only thing that "trickles down" is shit.
linlithgowoil wrote:I find it fascinating how people who support abortion go out of their way to make sure they do not refer to the baby as a person, simply because they can't see them yet.
Abortion is a fucking lame debate anytime anywhere. Only busy-bodies care. That's one thing I wont miss is fascists thinking they have a right to decide what I can do with my body.
NEOPO wrote:Yes it is hard to be unbiased and thats what we want from our reporters isnt it?
To be unbiased and really kinda not human.
We want news reporting machines but when we get them we will only believe that the machines have been hacked!!!!
And if these folks are normally liberal does that make it wrong?
Perhaps by seeing all the news all the time its easy for them to see just how idiotic the right and even the left has been.
Are you a christian/catholic Spe???
If so I would love to wax long on the subject with you.
I will warn you though that I am armed to the fucking teeth with knowledge from my experiences with the comparative study of religion - self study that is - as only one can learn the truth from within.
Are you against abortion Spe?
I have that personal story of abortion which i am sure that you have read.
Even after all that I still support a womans right to choose.
Its logic man not my preconceived notion of whats right - pure and simple logic.
Are you for tax cuts for the rich and do you believe in "trickle down" economics Spe?
I would equally like to discuss the ills of reagenism and bushism if you have time.
We can draw upon vast records,charts and data to see exactly what each side has done when in office.
In the end I am neither republican nor democrat.
Neither liberal nor conservative.
I dont know why I even ask you anything as its clear how you feel by the stupid shit you post.
If I was like the many I would have you on ignore yet I cannot bring myself to do it...... as I know......... ignorance is not bliss.
Macsporan wrote:Specop persistantly starts threads that have nothing remotely to do with Peak Oil for no other reason than to start fights and seek attention.
Beneath his hammy inpersonations of an honest workin' man he is a twisted sado-masochist poseur, and a bigotted whackjob who uses this forum like a urinal, drenching it in stinking rightwing propaganda.
His attacks on newbies chase many away to the loss of all concerned.
degrades the whole tone of this forum with his carefully-cultivated ignorance and ill-natured arrogance.
He has no sense of humour, humanity, generosity of spirit, goodwill or any other redeeming feature.
His interest in PO is negligible.
He should be banned, the sooner the better, in the interests of social hygiene.
Specop_007 wrote:Pro Choice. The issue is simple but people always try to fuddle and muddle it up.
Theres 2 sides. Pro Choice or Pro Life. There IS not middle ground.
Pro Life means you DO NOT support abortion under any circumstances.
If you can find even 1 instance in which you would allow an abortion then you are by definition pro choice.
Normally I do not agree with abortion. But, I am able to find certain instances and circumstances in which I would see no problems with an abortion.
Therefore I am, by definition, Pro Choice.
Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests