Heineken wrote:But let's remember everyone was expecting, and being told by "experts," that this was going to be another hurricane season for the record books.
That got deeply priced in over the summer. It was a huge "risk" component of the price. Now the market is shedding that component. Plus we have El Nino returning and its promise of yet another unusually warm winter.
Heineken wrote:In time, falling oil prices will spur demand and the price will go back up again.
Heineken wrote:If it weren't for the hurricane-season bust, I might be inclined to believe the drop was engineered.
But let's remember everyone was expecting, and being told by "experts," that this was going to be another hurricane season for the record books.
That got deeply priced in over the summer. It was a huge "risk" component of the price. Now the market is shedding that component. Plus we have El Nino returning and its promise of yet another unusually warm winter.
Tyler_JC wrote:Oil price being manipulated?
First, what would it cost to do something like that?
The total value of the world's oil production every year is somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.5 trillion.
In the two months before the election, the world's oil market is, in effect, $250 billion dollars.
If you want to manipulate a market and cause a massive price swing (20% or more), you probably need to have assets worth at least 10% of that market. Otherwise, the world's other players will be able to take advantage of your illogical market position (read, manipulative market position.)
Think about that claim for a moment. If I want to make the price of oil artificially low, I have to put a lot of sell orders out there. If the world doesn't follow suit, I will lose my shirt.
So controlling 10% of the market is a laughably conservative estimate.
But let's pretend that The Powers That Be want to lower oil prices by 20% to give themselves a political advantage. Are they really willing to risk losing 25 BILLION dollars to do it?
What happens if a few of those powerful people decide to make a short term profit and undercut their peers?
And oil futures are not shares of Exxon stock. In 10 years, the October 2006 contract of oil will be in the history books...but Exxon will still be a company and you will collect a very hefty dividend payout in that 10 years, not to mention the possible increase in the value of your investment.
So there is a possibility that TPTB could end up losing BILLIONS of dollars in order to lower oil prices.
Now, how much of a political advantage does oil at $60 instead of $75 buy them? Maybe 3%-5% of the electorate? Probably less?
Now, if you take one hundred million dollars and buy advertizements you will swing probably the same number of voters with zero risk. Also, you will be free from the possible legal consequences of manipulating the commodities market.
So would you rather risk billions and possibly have nothing to show for it or spend a couple hundred million the legitimate way and accomplishment the same result?
Remember, if TPTB don't lose money on the manipulation, the price of oil will sky rocket up the minute that the manipulation stops (have you ever seen this happen?)
Also, remember that the VAST majority of the players in the oil market don't actually want the oil showing up at their door. Meaning, the real size of the oil commodities market is much larger than my $1.5 trillion figure. I could be off by a factor of 10!
I'm sorry, the math just doesn't make sense.
If they wanted to manipulate prices, it would be MUCH easier to lie about oil inventories and claim that we have a multi-million barrel extra stockpile. This can be done by moving oil out of the SPR (or just lie about the whole damn thing) and calling it additional "inventories".
But as for direct manipulation of the NYMEX? Not a snowball's chance!
A Hedge Fund’s Loss Rattles Nerves By GRETCHEN MORGENSON and JENNY ANDERSON
Published: September 19, 2006
Enormous losses at one of the nation’s largest hedge funds resurrected worries yesterday that major bets by these secretive, unregulated investment partnerships could create widespread financial disruptions.
The hedge fund, Amaranth Advisors, based in Greenwich, Conn., made an estimated $1 billion on rising energy prices last year. Yesterday, the fund told its investors that it had lost more than $3 billion in the recent downturn in natural gas and that it was working with its lenders and selling its holdings “to protect our investors.”
Amaranth’s investors include pension funds, endowments and large financial firms like banks, insurance companies and brokerage firms. The Institutional Fund of Hedge Funds at Morgan Stanley was an investor in Amaranth; as of June 30, it had a stake valued at $124 million. The turnabout in the fortunes of the $9.25 billion fund reflects the decline in energy prices recently; natural gas prices fell 12 percent just last week.
Amaranth Natural-Gas Losses
May Have Far-Reaching Effect
Despite the losses suffered by Amaranth, several winners emerged. Among them, Centaurus Energy, a Houston hedge fund run by former Enron trader John Arnold that is now up more than 100% for the year. It continued to make profits in recent days trading in the same markets that scorched Amaranth, according to investors familiar with the situation.
According to prime brokers who deal with hedge funds, funds-of-funds executives and others active in the commodities market, winners during the recent downdraft in natural-gas prices also included Tudor Investment Corp. and four Wall Street firms: Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & Co. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.'s J.P. Morgan Securities. Traders at the Wall Street firms stressed that they weren't actively trading against Amaranth.
Representatives at Tudor and the Wall Street firms declined to comment.
A spokesman for Amaranth declined to comment.
Aaron wrote:I predict a post-election rise in oil prices to at least $70
Might take a few months...
Revi wrote:... Who knows? ...
EnergySpin wrote: My take on the question: the price of oil has always been and will always be "manipulated".
Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests