Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on September 12, 2017
7 Big Changes to the Energy Industry Coming by 2040
For the most part, the way we generate and use energy hasn’t changed a lot in the past 50 years. But that’s not likely to be the case in the decades to come. As renewable energy sources become cheaper and more reliable, and we develop technology that enables us to better store and distribute that power, there could be some big changes in the energy industry between now and 2040.
Factor in the historic Paris Agreement — signed by virtually every country on Earth — to reduce global carbon emissions, and it’s a near-certainty that we are at the threshold of an energy revolution. Keep reading to learn about seven of the biggest changes coming to the energy industry over the next 23 years.
The Paris Agreement could lead 80% of energy demand growth to come from low-carbon and renewable sources
The Paris Agreement has the potential to radically alter how energy is produced and used in the future (even without the participation of the United States), but it will take many decades for its impact to fully play out. The agreement, which has been agreed to in principal by 197 countries, has a primary goal of keeping global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Perhaps the only way to accomplish this is to significantly decrease the role of crude oil and coal as sources of energy production. The International Energy Agency states in its World Energy Outlook 2016 that “low-carbon fuels and technologies … win the race to meet the growth in energy demand, accounting for more than 80% of the increase to 2040.”
We can expect to see national policies around the world that incentivize the expansion of renewables such as wind and solar and increased use of natural gas, which produces far lower carbon emissions and pollutants than coal.
Image source: Getty Images.
40% of energy investments will be in renewables in the interim
Even as the world shifts toward renewables, existing energy assets will continue to consume a massive amount of oil, which should result in a gradual shift in how capital is invested in different kinds of energy. According to the IEA, 70% of global capital investments in energy supply have been in fossil fuels over the past 15 years. But looking forward, the IEA expects the balance to tip increasingly toward non-fossil fuels.
Between now and 2040, an estimated $44 trillion will be spent on energy supply, with 60% of that being spent on fossil fuels. That may not seem like a big shift, but that means a massive $17.6 trillion is set to be invested in renewables by 2040.
Image source: Getty Images.
There will be twice as many cars, but they’ll use less oil
Despite all the buzz about the potential of electric vehicles, they remain a tiny fraction of the cars on the road. But that will certainly change by 2040. According to the IEA, there will be about twice as many cars on the road in 2040 as there are now, but it will take less oil to fuel them all than it does to run the current global fleet. This will be accomplished by a handful of different things — mainly, a significant increase in the number of electric cars, which could be half or more of new vehicles sold.
For a glimpse of what the future could look like, consider the recent plans by Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) to go big on hybrids and electric vehicles. The company announced a plan to spend $700 million to expand a U.S. plant where two new EVs will be produced, and it intends to bring another half-dozen hybrids and EVs to market in coming years.
That said, there will still be a big need for fossil fuels for transportation in 2040, particularly for aviation and moving freight. Petrochemicals — that is, chemical products made from petroleum — will almost certainly be in much higher demand, as a more populous world will need more plastics, rubber, fertilizer, and dozens of other essential products.
Image source: Getty Images.
The United States’ role in securing the world’s energy will change
Growing dependence on renewables for electricity and transportation, along with growth in domestic fossil-fuel extraction, will drive a shift in how countries secure their energy access and infrastructure. This will almost certainly change America’s military priorities.
For decades, the U.S. has maintained a significant presence in various parts of the world in part to secure American access to crude oil. However, advanced production techniques have lowered America’s dependence on foreign oil, while the anticipated spread of the electric vehicle will further reduce the necessity for the U.S. to police global shipping routes.
At the same time, it will be even more critical to keep the U.S. electricity grid online and secure. Over the next couple of decades, domestic power production, including solar and wind assets, will also be fueling a significant share of our transportation network, while a smaller amount of oil (likely even less of it imported) will be fueling cars. For this reason, the U.S. government will likely have increased its defense spending to secure our domestic energy production and transmission assets, while dedicating fewer assets to simply making sure foreign oil reaches our shores.
Image source: Getty Images.
One fossil fuel will increase its market share
Over the next 23 years, coal will continue to see its prospects diminish, while crude oil will probably continue to grow in demand, if at a relatively low rate. However, one other fossil fuel — natural gas — is on track to see its share of the global energy mix increase.
While it still generates carbon emissions, natural gas is by far the “cleanest” of the hydrocarbons, generating lower amounts of greenhouse gases and the particulates that poison waterways and cause smog. Furthermore, technological innovation has made it even cheaper to produce natural gas, and global demand has led to major investment in liquefaction and export capacity from companies like Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSEMKT: LNG), which has built one of the biggest LNG export facilities in the world in Louisiana and is building at least two more on the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Natural gas is also on track to see its use as a petrochemical feedstock increase, especially in the U.S. Petrochemical manufacturers are on track to invest $200 billion in expanded manufacturing capacity on the Gulf Coast in the next decade alone. These plants will likely operate for many decades to come.
Image source: Getty Images.
The number of people living without electricity will be cut in half
According to the United Nations, 1.2 billion people around the world still don’t have access to electricity. This number will decline substantially over the next 23 years, as the bulk of new energy production will take place in developing countries.
And while it’s certainly a positive that fewer people will be forced to survive without electricity, there will still be 500 million people globally living without power, despite the United Nations’ goal of having universal access to energy by 2030. According to the IEA, the majority of these people will be in rural areas in sub-Saharan Africa.
Image source: Getty Images.
Water and energy will become even more closely intertwined
Water is set to be one of the most at-risk resources in the coming decades. Between climate change and the ever-growing world population, water could become more expensive and difficult to access by 2040. And the repercussions will be felt in the energy industry, too.
This is because the relationship between water and energy will almost certainly tighten. With the planet’s population set to increase by at least 1 billion people in the interim, we’ll need more sources of pure water, which will have to come partly from energy-intensive methods such as desalinization and purification
Meanwhile, water also plays a critical role in energy production. Whether it’s the steam that drives generators in power plants, the rivers that power hydroelectric dams, or the water used in hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells, we will only need more and more water to power the world and keep people hydrated.
57 Comments on "7 Big Changes to the Energy Industry Coming by 2040"
dave thompson on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 11:05 am
Oh how gloriously wonderful the future will be (being sarcastic).
penury on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 11:11 am
If anyone believes half of this, you need urgent medical intervention for your and your families safety.
Outcast_Searcher on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 11:33 am
Given what’s going on, and the various forecasts out there, this is a middle-of-the-road forecast. I don’t see any outrageous claims, given 23 years for green energy and EV’s to be developed.
I see a realization that third world growth continues apace, given the forecast for a DOUBLING of the number of cars. I see an acknowledgement of the continued need for FF’s, given the forecast for a larger role for cheap NG, and for more oil to be used (which is roughly in line with EIA and IEA scale forecasts).
For the doomers, if a forecast says we’re not all dead or doomed in a month or a year, it’s silly. And yet, here we are, over a decade since they’ve been saying this (5 or 6 decades for some of them), stumbling along, with the good and the bad. With technology helping, but not curing our ills. That’s why I’m a moderate, and this forecast looks quite moderate to me, given realities like the scale of energy demand, physics, and economics.
rockman on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 11:44 am
Dave – Just how glorious given this cornucopian sees an INCREASE in oil and NG onsumption in 2040 from where we are today?
“Over the next 23 years…crude oil will probably continue to grow in demand…” And “natural gas is on track to see its share of the global energy mix increase.”
Not sure how that equates to LESS production of GHG then we have today. But it does match the fact that there is no mandatory requirement any of the pledges of any country made in the Paris Accord.
CAM on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 11:48 am
Just too many unknowns: likely, might, could etc. on top of some really tenuous assumptions.
We will just have to wait and see.
But the article is right on one thing. There have not been a lot of changes to BAU to date. Just look at the EIA stats.
fmr-paultard on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 12:59 pm
eurotard, if kindship is so good why don’t you stick with your cousines or ur cloese relatives or your village?
instead you’re here recruiting your Cambridge Five. The suppertards are mine. I admit I’m here to read what they say.
grow your own close kinship and talk to them. leave my supertards alone
Go Speed Racer on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 2:56 pm
Just one energy change coming up,
by 2040: won’t be any.
Boat on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 5:17 pm
WASHINGTON, D.C. – In conjunction with the annual Solar Power International conference, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released new research today that shows the solar industry has achieved the 2020 utility-scale solar cost target set by the SunShot Initiative. Largely due to rapid cost declines in solar photovoltaic (PV) hardware, the average price of utility-scale solar is now 6 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh).
I guess the Jew red controlling folks gets credit for the drop in solar hardware. Red Jews doing green work is an example of how haters are not the best at messaging. lol
https://energy.gov/articles/energy-department-announces-achievement-sunshot-goal-new-focus-solar-energy-office
Mark on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 5:49 pm
Twice as many cars, but they’ll use less oil….uh, not likely. Delusion at it’s finest!
deadlykillerbeaz on Tue, 12th Sep 2017 6:09 pm
A record high temperature was set today for this date in my neck of the woods.
Coal production has declined in the US, coal production will probably increase worldwide.
Crude oil will be the number one energy source and will remain number one.
Florida will need truckloads of new materials.
Some will never rebuild.
Simon on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 12:16 am
All seems reasonable, but it is a prediction in a bubble, assuming that the rest of BAU keeps going, and the Gwahar doesn’t gurgle to an end (Psychological shock, I reckon would put a bit of a dampner on the worlds economies) etc etc etc.
Cloggie on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 2:33 am
Nobody can predict with accuracy how the world will look like in 2040, but there is nothing outrageous about this article.
Antius on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 6:47 am
“Growing dependence on renewables for electricity and transportation, along with growth in domestic fossil-fuel extraction, will drive a shift in how countries secure their energy access and infrastructure. This will almost certainly change America’s military priorities.
For decades, the U.S. has maintained a significant presence in various parts of the world in part to secure American access to crude oil. However, advanced production techniques have lowered America’s dependence on foreign oil, while the anticipated spread of the electric vehicle will further reduce the necessity for the U.S. to police global shipping routes.”
I think this one is unlikely – even if oil were to disappear as a transport fuel altogether (which it won’t).
If the US economy continues its drift towards a natural gas based energy economy with embedded renewables, natural gas will increasingly displace coal and nuclear power as the country’s electricity fuel. Renewable energy will be limited to ~30% of total electricity production because curtailment is wasteful and storage is not economically feasible at any significant level. I also find it improbable that the US fracking industry can continue to remain a significant contributor to gas supply, without large increases in natural gas prices. So the US may end up being a big market for LNG. Which will require policing the sea lanes and interfering in the politics of countries in the Middle East. Just like today.
Boat on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 9:51 am
antius,
If nat gas prices get much above $3 you will see a US return to coal. This is exactly what happened within the last year. A mini coal comeback in market share.
Kenz300 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 11:40 am
Wind and solar will continue to increase market share.
They are safer, cleaner and cheaper than fossil fuels.
Electric vehicle growth continues to ramp up with every major auto maker planning new all electric vehicles in the next year or two. Battery costs continue to fall making all electric vehicles more competitive every year. Less maintenance, no oil changes, no stopping at gas stations and always leave home in the morning with a full charge. EV’s are just better.
Cloggie on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 12:03 pm
Today another big step has been taken towards the renewable energy future. Dutch #1 gas-infrastructure specialist Gasunie has joined the “North Sea Wind Power Hub” and has committed itself to participate in the construction of an artificial energy island in the middle of the North Sea, that will function as a hub for the concentration and distribution of 100 GW of offshore wind energy. In addition Gasunie will participate in reusing old and empty natural gas fields to store hydrogen, converted from wind electricity.
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/09/13/gasunie-joining-north-sea-wind-power-hub-consortium/
John Norris on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 12:44 pm
Thanks Cloggie. Love your RE updates and optimism. Keep it coming 🙂
Cloggie on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 2:00 pm
Love your RE updates and optimism. Keep it coming
Glad to be of service! 😉
Cloggie on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 2:36 pm
VW I.D. Buzz self-driving electric minibus to be released in 2022:
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/09/13/vw-i-d-buzz-self-driving-electric-minibus-for-2022/
Cloggie on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 3:01 pm
DONG rewarded this week to build largest wind farm in the world, Hornsea-2 (1.4GW), in the British part of the North Sea.
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/09/13/dong-to-build-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-park-hornsea-uk/
MASTERMIND on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 3:26 pm
To many ‘if’s’
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 6:54 pm
“Who rules America?” (for now)
1. Israel first crowd.
2. National Capitalists.
3. Generals.
4. Business Elite.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-rules-america-2/5608802
Notice the absence of the actual American citizen? Democracy? LMAO
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 6:59 pm
“America: Imperial Bully Threatening World Peace” (Insanity in DC)
“America’s rage for unchallenged global dominance represents the greatest threat to world peace, security and humanity’s survival.
It’s geopolitically out-of-control, both warrior wings of its duopoly governance hellbent on forcing its will on all other nations.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-imperial-bully-threatening-world-peace/5608825
And the citizens permit/support it all the way to their government bennies. Greed.
Davy on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:03 pm
“Globalresearch is an “anti-Western” website that can’t distinguish between serious analysis and discreditable junk — and so publishes both. It’s basically the moonbat equivalent to Infowars or WND.”
“While some of GlobalResearch’s articles discuss legitimate humanitarian concerns, its view of science, economics, and geopolitics is conspiracist — if something goes wrong, the Jews West didit! The site has long been a crank magnet: If you disagree with “Western” sources on 9/11, or HAARP, or vaccines, or H1N1, or climate change, or anything published by the “mainstream” media, then GlobalResearch is guaranteed to have a page you will love.”
“The website (under the domain names globalresearch.ca(link), globalresearch.org(link), globalresearch.com(link), and sister site mondialisation.ca(link)) is run by the Montreal-based non-profit The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) founded by Michel Chossudovsky,[2][3] a former professor of economics at the University of Ottawa, Canada.[4]”
http://tinyurl.com/q4vgpdb
MASTERMIND on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:12 pm
makatiu1 you are sadistic because you are most likely a psychopath. That is why you love to see the misery of others of your same species. Your moral outrage at the US is simply just self serving. It makes you feel like a good person for hating the bad.
Boat on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:31 pm
mak,
If the Jew 1st crowd has so much influence why does Israel get 3.1 billion in aid per year from an almost 20 Trillion economy.
Q. How much does the Space Shuttle cost?
A. The Space Shuttle Endeavour, the orbiter built to replace the Space Shuttle Challenger, cost approximately $1.7 billion.
Q. How much does it cost to launch a Space Shuttle?
A. The average cost to launch a Space Shuttle is about $450 million per mission.
NASA has an 18.4 billion budget.
3.1 billion of love for Israel will buy you a space shuttle and 3 trips per year.
Boat on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:40 pm
mak,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/world/which-countries-get-the-most-foreign-aid/
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:43 pm
Boat, how much does the US Military cost? We are in the ME to give Israel control of the area. Syria is about a pipeline for Israel.
Most of the billionaires in America are Jews. A lot of Congress are Jews. Jews run your banks, the Federal Reserve, etc. Do some research about who owns/controls what and then comer back with an informed, intelligent rebuttal.
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:44 pm
Muddymind, you are the one with delusions and mental problems, having ingrained all of the brainwashing you have endured since birth.
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:49 pm
Boat, quoting from the mainstream US propaganda machine WaPo is NOT a valid source. Neither is the NYT bullshit rag. Only fools believe the propaganda they post.
This is to a country that bragged a few years ago to not need ANY aid, but they still have their hands out. Jews are money grubbers and believe they should rule the world because the Bible says so. Prove me wrong.
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:50 pm
Davy, shooting the messenger does not change the message.
Davy on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:53 pm
MM has you tagged makat
Davy on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 7:59 pm
What message, makat. I call it noise.
Apneaman on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 8:18 pm
MASTERMIND, to qualify as a a sadist one has to actually cause the harm. I think you may be looking for that German word schadenfreude.
scha·den·freu·de
ˈSHädənˌfroidə/
noun
noun: Schadenfreude; noun: schadenfreude
pleasure derived by someone from another person’s misfortune.
Hell who else but the Germans would come up with word like that? Sadistic basterds.
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 11:08 pm
Ap, education is lacking in some here. Mostly Davy’s ‘grade school level’ friends. Inability to refute means attack with stupidity, name calling and putdowns. None of those do more then prove my point.
makati1 on Wed, 13th Sep 2017 11:20 pm
” don’t mean to sound dramatic, but Americans hate each other right now. And it’s getting worse. We’re just a market crash… a recession… or some other extreme event away from more widespread violence. A new form of civil war is even possible. … This is why I urge readers to diversify outside of the US. The fracturing of society will create a lot of political risk. And that’s on top of the risks from money printing, higher taxes, and increasing regulations. … International diversification is the ultimate insurance policy. Think of it as “freedom insurance.””
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/its-time-take-out-freedom-insurance
Been there. Done that. Have a more free and secure life. ^_^
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 12:34 am
“If the Jew 1st crowd has so much influence why does Israel get 3.1 billion in aid per year from an almost 20 Trillion economy.”
Sure boat, 3.1 billion. (facepalm)
Meanwhile back to reality: Dov Zakheim and the missing trillions:
https://www.corbettreport.com/pentagon-frets-over-wasted-billions-ignores-missing-trillions/
When neocohn (((Zakheim))) controlled the finances of the Pentagon, 2.3 trillion $ went missing. Zakheim was a PNAC signatory. Rumsfeld made the announcement 1 day before 9/11, so he knew that this fact would go under in the hysteria, Rumsfeld knew what was coming. He also announced that a group of controllers would investigate the matter. Next day a “plane” crashed into the Pentagon building at exactly that spot where the group of comptrollers were working and most got killed and all Rumsfeld’s problems were solved. Wasn’t that considerate of “hijacker” Hanni Hanjour?
Now where did you think these missing trillions ended up? In Belgium? Japan? Or in f* Israel?
You are run by gangsters boat, for more than a century now. But you can go asleep again boat, your government is taking care of you… and the rest of the planet. And folks like you, Davy and the TalmudTurk are covering it up.
https://youtu.be/K7C0_mcK8LE
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 2:52 am
Makati quotes ” don’t mean to sound dramatic, but Americans hate each other right now. And it’s getting worse. We’re just a market crash… a recession… or some other extreme event away from more widespread violence. A new form of civil war is even possible. … This is why I urge readers to diversify outside of the US. The fracturing of society will create a lot of political risk. And that’s on top of the risks from money printing, higher taxes, and increasing regulations. … International diversification is the ultimate insurance policy. Think of it as “freedom insurance.””
While I agree with the diagnosis that America is near breaking point, I disagree with this cosmopolitanism as the solution. There is no way tens of millions of Americans are in the position to relocate outside the country, only a happy few can. Like loners without serious family ties.
This cosmopolitan attitude is one of the reasons why this immigration disaster could happen in the first place. America never had the chance to form a real “blood-and-soil” nation. Most immigrants arrived in the US in the 2nd half of the 19th century and they were determined to leave the “old world” behind them and keen to show that they could create something better. But it wouldn’t happen. Around 1900 a new group from Eastern Europe, Russia and Ukraine (hi George Soros, hi Apneaman!) took over where the British had left off in 1776 and these folks had no interest whatsoever in transforming America in a real homogeneous Christian nation of European descent. Their intention was and is to transform America in a blueprint of what the rest of the world should become as well: a territory without borders and local identity, a completely mixed global secular society without borders, all under control of the self-deified (self-chosen) bankers and media-masters of the US NE-coast. After 1933 they owned the government and felt strong enough for some major league expansion.
By 1941, half a year before they cornered Japan enough to force it to deal the first blow, the American elite began to prepare its population for the coming American Century:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6139.htm
The article contains 82 references to the word “war”.
The US meanwhile had 29% of global GDP, dwarfing everybody else and they had a quiet agreement with their brethren in the USSR…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bSAB5OPkwQ
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 2:53 am
[continued]
… (#2 with 13% global GDP) that the destruction of Europe was next on the menu. And they had Churchill in Europe to do the dirty work of war mongering for (((them))).
https://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Jews-Friendship-Martin-Gilbert-ebook/dp/B009OZN68A/ref=sr_1_1
And the rest is history.
America peaked in 1950 with 40% global GDP…
http://tinyurl.com/c84bwrg
…because the rest of the world was in ruins, a state of affairs exactly foreseen by the (((architects))) of the American Century
Lame lying explanation offered to the “huddled masses” of limited education, intellectual honesty and character: “we saved Europe’s asses”.
By 1965, after the (((deep state))) wasted the last insurgent against the deep state/NWO, JFK…
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 2:54 am
[last part]
http://tinyurl.com/p4ymhj8
…the US elite began with the planned destruction of European America by opening the borders for third world immigration; the same happened in vassal Europe.
But by 2016, a European American, not certified by the deep state, managed to conquer the presidency, by responding to the dispossession fear of European America. And although he will fail in bringing back the 1950s (MAGA), he will succeed in showing to European Americans that the system can be defeated.
On top of that, in geopolitics everything went downhill since 2003, with the Syrian debacle the latest defeat. Russia is asserting itself and together with China know exactly what the US intentions are and they are successfully building their defenses. Vassal Europe has meanwhile overtaken the US in economy ($20.5T vs $18.5T) and this difference will only grow in the near future. And it is unlikely that Brussels will settle for being a vassal much longer.
In other words, there is not going to be a global US empire and there is not going to be a 2nd American Century.
European America is meanwhile facing the demographic ruin of their country. Now how do you think they are going to respond?
tic-toc-tic-toc.
Davy on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 4:56 am
We are fine cloggi and makat. Yea, things are falling apart here but it is a big place and there is a lot of good things happening too. It will be a process and I am less doomish than I was just 2 years ago. Asia and Europe are a mess and going down the same path. Asia is even worse position being full of people and a destroyed environment. Europe will be overrun by the south. The place is full of lazy old people who are becoming unproductive.
You guys are so worried about death and destruction here makes me wonder. People who are preoccupied with others death and destruction have personality issues. Both of you are old men that could be part of it. Both of you have history revisions and fantasy futures that consume your lives. These are based on discrediting and diminishing other and talking yourselves up. Oldest game in the book so one has to say what is the catch. The catch is things are also bad where you are. Both of you are in regions in overshoot with population densities much worse than mine. You have economies that are no better yet you whine and point fingers my way. Both of you are sick old men. It sucks thinking about getting old and stupid like you two.
Simon on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 7:18 am
Lets just assume that Cloggie and Mak are correct and that the world is being run by the ‘jewish nation’
According to your own belief in social evolution, would this not mean they are a more highly evolved and more intelligent genus than Aryans etc.
In brief should we all be toddling off to Israel to breed with them and this lower their IQ ?
makati1 on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 8:27 am
“We are fine…” DENIAL in flashing neon lights! Typical of most Americans. We are the “exceptional/indispensable” people. We are so much better than…(fill in the blank)…and will be able to manage quite well because…(fill in the pet reason). Anyone who claims that that is not the case is…(fill in the slur).
Seems that the crash of 1929 happened when Americans thought that the market could only go up forever. In 2008, they believed that house prices could only go up forever. The new one is that we will be able to manage the total financial and economic collapse with minimum pain and suffering because…(fill in your belief). That the Empire will go on forever. And, those “others” will be the ones to suffer most because…(fill in your pet phobia). LMAO
Davy on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 8:49 am
makat, spare me your senile drama. Saying fine is not bragging and boasting like you do. It is saying we will get by as best we can in a situation getting worse. I am so glad I don’t live in the world of denial you live in. I cringe at the though of turning out old and senile like you but I know it is inevitable. We are all going to die and you are the closest to that point in our group statistically speaking.
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 8:53 am
According to your own belief in social evolution, would this not mean they are a more highly evolved and more intelligent genus than Aryans etc.
Not the world, but the West or American empire.
What makes you think they are “higher evolved”? Smart mafia is a better description. What is their contribution anyway? They invented the nuclear bomb, very fitting since it is not possible to put more misery in a single m3.
Furthermore: (cultural) Marxism, big f* deal. Communism/Gulag: facepalm. Freudianism, huge contribution to the undesirable sexualization of life. Multiculturalism: intended destruction of white society. Art? Music: Mendelsohn, not bad but second tier compared to Aryan giants Bach, Beethoven and Mozart. Painting: Picasso, give me break. Commie blowhard compared with Rembrandt, Michelangelo. Science: there were a few prominent scientists, but science and technology is an Aryan invention and would have evolved without the Jews perfectly. (wait for (((apneaman))) to bring up that Chinese umbrella inventor again).
If you like spending your time in the Gulag, then by all means, keep worshiping your “higher evolved betters”.
In brief should we all be toddling off to Israel to breed with them and this lower their IQ ?
No chance, they will fight these marriages tooth and nail (just like the Germans of the thirties).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/12090439/What-is-it-like-to-be-a-Jew-married-to-an-Arab-in-Israel.html
Besides IQ in Israel is not very high.
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
Israel is the country where the Jewish deplorables live, normal folks with a flag, anthem, soccer team. What you mean is Henry Ford’s “International Jew” (naughty subtitle: the world’s foremost problem). They live in America where the white folks, descendants of the underclasses of Europe and Russia (“huddled masses”) are docile, not too intellectual and easy to control.
Oh Simon, thanks again for Britain delivering us into their hands, by instigating two world wars. Perhaps that Brexit will offer us continental Europeans an opportunity to escape and you can enjoy life in Orwell’s Oceania (pink=Anglosphere) all by yourself. We continental Europeans are better off in an alliance with Russia and perhaps even China. At least they will not demand us to give up our lands to Africa and Arabia. Good luck with your majority Muslims capital, after all the Eastern Europeans will have left.
http://tinyurl.com/yb8cute7
Perhaps we can limit the demise of the white race to Anglosphere alone. Although perhaps in Middle America some resistance will emerge after all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGSAhNZnisk
One thing is certain, global-Zion (“2nd American Century”) is not going to happen. Now that’s a start. And Israel doesn’t have much future either and is toast once the KSA domino will fall. I am far less pessimistic in 2017 than I was in 2002. Things turned to the better for us continental Europeans. And hopefully we can save a large chunk of European-America as well.
Mobilized people with torches, always +1.lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeerLbTe1gI
Once America is partitioned Henry Ford’s problem will be solved.
Davy on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 9:20 am
So clog you are saying they don’t live in Europe? Do you forget you Eurotards invented the Jews as they are now and then through your self depravity of centuries of war they were exported through a final solution to the new world.
LMFAO, two can play these games. Fantasy and revisions are as deep as the imagination. I know several Jews. Many don’t practice or think much of being Jewish. Some are cliquish and stay in tight communities. I don’t care for the tight communities myself. Whenever I have done business with them they are tight asses and sticklers but hate them for the reason you guys do on this board shows mental lite personalities. Clog, BTW, you even know any Jews?
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 9:37 am
We are fine cloggi and makat. Yea, things are falling apart here
Find the huge contradiction.lol
Here on MTV, the hanging of a white child:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qku2WZ7aRYw
[2:30]
But Davy and boat still don’t have a clue into what direction Amurrica is evolving. Being white will be criminalized once Trump will have been dealt with by the deep state.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC-Cqkq6zWc
The stinking West is a prison that needs to be completely destroyed.
This is Britain, 4 years in the slammer for an internet posting:
https://altright.com/2017/09/12/prisoners-of-conscience/
Everybody talks about naive Sweden and their insane immigration policies but the British elite is plain vile and Orwellian. I am glad they will be gone. Real resistance is in Russia and Eastern Europe. I prefer them.
Here the real rulers of America, setting European America up for the Gulag, like happened to that other naive majority: the Russians:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c
onlooker on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 9:48 am
Zionists are not Jews and they originated in areas around Kazakhstan. As for Israel nothing more than a base or outpost for the Deepstate of which a principal component is the western Banking System controlled by the Rothchilds
http://www.rense.com/general83/khaz.htm
The Khazarian ‘Jews’ are NOT descendants of the 12 Tribes of Israel and their world view and lack of truly, pious spiritual Judaism have created conflict within that religion ever since. To a great extent, these are our current day Zionist Jews (including Neocons, of course) who have formed a world power banking, extortion cult of war and death that has little or nothing to do with being devout adherents of Judaism. These are the folks who think nothing of breaking the law, lying (Kol Nidre), stealing, graft, corruption, assassination, blackmail, extortion or destroying tens of millions of people to get their way.”
Simon on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 9:59 am
onlooker … read about the jews of Cairo, they were hard bastards, no different to any other people.
however this thread is booooring
sod all to do with energy, just descended into a scud missile debate(unguided).
later taters
Cloggie on Thu, 14th Sep 2017 10:15 am
So clog you are saying they don’t live in Europe?
Thanks to Adolf they have been thoroughly thinned out. In Holland their numbers have been reduced from 160,000 to 40,000. Now you have the problem. Well-deserved.
Do you forget you Eurotards invented the Jews
What’s that for a rubbish. They invented themselves…
http://khazaria.com/
… and infiltrated out lands, like in America, by the end of the 19th century.
as they are now and then through your self depravity of centuries of war they were exported through a final solution to the new world.
That’s pretty rich for the master killers of the 20th century (after your Soviet buddies) to whine about European wars, with the biggest one (WW2) entirely instigated by you. But you will always sleaze out of any real discussion.
And regarding this final solution, give me the name and proof of a single one who was gassed in one of the so-called six extermination camps or shut up, you yanktard.
It was a story waiting to be attached to a suitable event:
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/sixmillion-34appearances.jpg
Ben Gurion announcing the 6 million story, even before Nuremberg had begun. It was a foregone conclusion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2Ae8T0FmFg
And who ran the Nuremberg trial?
On Sept. 25, 1945, Tom Dodd, the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observations:
“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge — you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial — for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter —it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”
Note that this admission is coming from someone who is sympathetic to the Jews and opposes “anti-semitism.”
Right 75% Jewish staff had all the means to insert the greatest falsehood in history.
I’ll wipe my a** with that final solution of yours, you city nuker.