Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 10, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Difference between Trump and Clinton as president: One million barrels of oil a day

Difference between Trump and Clinton as president: One million barrels of oil a day thumbnail

U.S. oil production is bound for a significant shake up after the presidential election in November, says a senior editor at energy-information provider Platts.

“This election is going to have a major impact on the direction of U.S. and, possibly, global oil supply. Maybe the most significant impact of any election in U.S. history,” said Brian Scheid, senior oil editor at Platts, at the Platts Crude Oil Summit in London on Tuesday.

Looking at a worst case/best case scenario worked out between several analysts in Washington, he estimated that with a Republican win, U.S. oil production could jump by as much as 500,000 barrels a day. If the Democrats win, there could be a decline of 500,000 barrels a day, Scheid said.

“Essentially a one million barrel per day swing depending on the result of a single election. This is a relatively major difference in supply, equal to nearly the amount of crude the entire state of North Dakota now pumps each day,” he said.

Scheid cautioned, however, that it’s extremely difficult to quantify the impact on the oil market and that it’s a best estimate with some informed speculation. Other major events such a coordinated OPEC output cut, Libya starting to export large amounts of crude again or a collapse of Venezuela’s economy are other variables that could easily have a bigger effect on the market, he noted.

But looking separately at U.S. oil production, it seems inevitable that the election outcome will change the dynamics.

Hillary Clinton — pushed left by the movement behind her Democratic rival Bernie Sanders — has vowed to reduce American oil consumption by a third and is seen as possibly banning fracking on public land. She may also further push for efforts to combat climate change, Scheid said.

“Overall, the biggest concern for the U.S. oil industry is how Clinton will deal with fracking,” he said.

And then there’s Trump. The Republican front-runner hasn’t laid out many details on his energy policy, but has boasted that he could have negotiated a much better nuclear agreement with Iran. In a recent interview with the New York Times, he also said he’s considering a ban on oil imports from Saudi Arabia and other Arab allies.

“We can talk about the logistical impossibility of this, but I think if you’re saying you’re open to a Saudi oil ban, the skies the limit for your energy policy,” Scheid said.

“Who wins in November may dictate if the U.S. shale renaissance peaked last year or if this year has been a dip ahead of a new high,” he said.

U.S. oil production peaked in April last year at 9.6 million barrels a day, but has since declined in response to lower oil prices and cuts in capital expenditures. The U.S. Energy Information Agency estimates that domestic production will fall to around 8 million barrels a day by the third quarter of next year.

marketwatch



10 Comments on "Difference between Trump and Clinton as president: One million barrels of oil a day"

  1. Apneaman on Tue, 10th May 2016 4:03 pm 

    The libtards are saying the same thing about climate change and Hillary, which is the same thing they said when Obama was running. Last chance, every thing hinges on it. Bullshit American self important delusions. If there is one thing most Americans have in common it is their complete level of certainty. The cancer will go on for as long as physically and economically possible and it don’t matter who is the head tumor. There is simply no way anyone on the entire fucking planet “knows” that production would drop because of Hillary.

    What about the consequences of burning it? Why not discuss how AGW is and will continue to slow production and ramp up the costs? Ft Mac for one. What about the flood on the oil cancer center of America, Houston? Zero effect on the industry? No expense? AGW is going to keep destroying infrastructure and then the economy as we know it will be done. Don’t even need peak oil.

  2. Davy on Tue, 10th May 2016 4:05 pm 

    If Shillery gets in she will fudge on her green promises. So this article is bogus. If Trump gets in energy companies will have a blank check especially when an oil related crisis period erupts within 2 years.

  3. Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Tue, 10th May 2016 4:29 pm 

    This article is on par with the average ‘merkan, and by ‘on par’ I mean fucking retarded.

  4. JuanP on Tue, 10th May 2016 5:07 pm 

    BS!

  5. makati1 on Tue, 10th May 2016 5:43 pm 

    Waiting for Short to weigh in on this piece of bullshit…

  6. dave thompson on Tue, 10th May 2016 5:50 pm 

    In the US prez selection, it is impossible to vote out Goldman-Sachs from power.

  7. Anonymous on Tue, 10th May 2016 7:57 pm 

    RoFL!

  8. GregT on Wed, 11th May 2016 12:01 am 

    Sounds like desperation is really starting to kick in on Wall Street.

  9. dooma on Wed, 11th May 2016 2:25 am 

    nice one Dave 🙂

  10. penury on Wed, 11th May 2016 9:23 am 

    The truth is that the Pres, will not make a difference, the die has been cast. Too much debt, reduced energy content, gradually reducing availability, consumers who cannot afford the product, and that is simply the rest of the world, looking at the U.S. they are in worse shape than the ROW.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *