Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on July 14, 2018

Bookmark and Share

Ten years after oil peak, what has changed?

July 11, 2008 was an unforgettable day for the oil industry. The price of West Texas Intermediate — a grade of crude oil used as a benchmark in oil pricing — hit an all-time high of $147 per barrel in New York.
So, 10 years later, what has changed? There have been a few major developments in the oil industry, but as far as the way OPEC works, little has altered.

First, OPEC is still producing the same amount of crude. In July 2008, OPEC’s crude oil production was 32.6 million barrels per day (bpd), compared with 32.3 million bpd in June 2018, taking into account the end of voluntary restraints on oil output by some OPEC countries and that the size of OPEC is now larger than in 2008.
Second, the US is still blaming OPEC for the increase in oil prices. In 2008, when speculative activities in the future market of oil pushed prices up to unprecedented levels, the US government and other oil consumers asked OPEC to increase supply at the Jeddah Energy Meeting.

Saudi Arabia responded to these claims with a counter-argument. At the meeting, the late King Abdullah blamed speculation for the increase, while his Minister of Petroleum, Ali Al-Naimi, noted that oil prices did not reflect physical market fundamentals.
Al-Naimi said in his address to the 35 energy ministers at the meeting that supply was not the issue as it had grown by 400,000 barrels at least above demand growth level. He also pointed to the fact that oil stocks were ample and at levels within their normal range.

There have been a few major developments in the oil industry, but as far as the way OPEC works, little has altered over the last 10 years.

Wael Mahdi

The-then US Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman told reporters that there was no evidence that speculation was behind the sharp increase in prices and asked the Saudis to produce more. However, Barack Obama, a Democrat senator at the time, called for a crackdown on oil market speculators, whom he also blamed for the price escalation of 2008.

Today, it seems that this blame behavior is central to the Republican approach as President Donald Trump is looking through the same lenses that his Republican predecessors used. There is nothing new in Trump pushing OPEC to increase production to calm prices despite the fact that the organization, as in 2008, is not responsible for the increases.
This time around, oil prices are up because of geopolitical factors and fears over supply disruptions. US sanctions against oil producers, such as Venezuela and Iran, are the main reason for the current price environment.

Turning to another similarity, the world’s spare production capacity of oil today is no better than it was 10 years ago.
Despite the fact that shale oil producers in the US are a major force shaping the market, there are limits to what they can produce in 2018, and this cap is also a factor in high prices. The world is still facing a lack of sufficient investment in oil and gas production, which will lead to a tightness in the market in the next two to three years. US politicians, however, are occupied with short-term price movements — as this will shape the upcoming local elections — instead of trying to solve long-term problems in the industry.
Fourth, Saudi Arabia is still the country with the most idle spare capacity. However, it will no longer carry the burden alone. In 2008, Saudi Arabia did not complete its maximum capacity expansion program to 12.5 million bpd, yet it pledged to increase production that year to 9.7 million bpd to calm the market.

Even if the Kingdom wanted to carry the burden alone, it would not be easy as global oil demand has risen by 15 million bpd since 2008. Also, there are fewer huge increments left in Saudi Arabia to raise production capacity substantially compared with 2008. And this will require larger investments than before.

In 2008, Al-Naimi announced that the Kingdom had identified a series of future crude oil mega-increments totaling another 2.5 million bpd that could be built “if and when crude oil demand levels warrant their development.” Among these prospective increments are 900,000 bpd in Zuluf, 700,000 bpd in Safaniyah, 300,000 bpd in Berri, 300,000 bpd in Khurais and 250,000 bpd in Shaybah.
Aramco has already used Khurais and Shyabah increments to maintain the current 12.5 million bpd capacity, and soon will use another 300,000 bpd in Marjan for the same purpose, and in the near future the Berri increment will be tapped as well.
For Saudi Arabia to consider a 15 million bpd scenario again, some security of demand and a supportive oil price environment need to be in place. However, current political thinking in many consuming nations is not supportive of fossil fuel, so politicians should not be surprised to see another structural supply crunch that will push prices to new highs. The $147 that the world saw in 2008 is still possible again.

arab news



31 Comments on "Ten years after oil peak, what has changed?"

  1. Larry on Sat, 14th Jul 2018 11:30 pm 

    What has changed? People still think peak oil is too far into the future to worry about. Or that incremental changes in fuel economy and a slow switch to electric cars will save the day. Peak demand?
    Nothing will change until we are forced to change.

  2. Bob Jones on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 1:17 am 

    It is utterly amazing to me that it has been 10 years since the financial collapse… without any follow-on breakdown of American society.

    The fast food, football, and Ford F-150s still exist, enjoyed without a care in the world by the overfed, apathetic, and ignorant masses.

    How long can this go on? I don’t know. But, for the first time in years, it really feels like something may have broken this time around. No way any sane person can feel confident with a clown like Trump (still can’t believe ‘Muricans had a choice between that and Billary).

    The Baby Boomers produced some real winners in Clinton, Bush, and Trump. No way you can fuck up a country with brilliant minds like that.

  3. Dark Fired Tobacco on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 1:19 am 

    The wild card is the automated electic-powered vehicle distributed in fleet form with full connectivity. Such a disruptive technology would upend the oil world along with auto manufacturing and maintenance as well as those industries dependent on auto accidents: insurance companies, trial lawyers, repair shops, and trauma clinics.

  4. Danlxyz on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 2:22 am 

    Well you have to consider that most of those electric powered vehicles are actually fossil fuel powered. About 70% of electricity is generated by coal or natural gas in the US.

  5. Makati1 on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 6:17 am 

    “Ten years after oil peak, what has changed?”

    The Us National debt has doubled to over $20 Trillion. (100+% of GDP.)
    Chinese Yuan is now part of the IMF’s basket of currencies.
    China is now the largest economy in the world by purchasing power.
    The Us is suffering a huge increase in suicides, drug deaths and obesity.
    Over 50,000 more Americans have given up their passports and moved out of the Us.
    American scientists cannot visit the space station without hitching a ride on a Russian or French shuttle.
    And on and on.
    The Us is ten years closer to collapse.

  6. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 7:33 am 

    So 3rd world it is now 10.years closer to collapse. You are backtracking from your previous estimates of imminent collapse. What changed to make you less pessimistic?

  7. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 7:50 am 

    The Downfall Of U.S. Nuclear Power

    “The reality is you cannot actually replace 20 percent of the need with wind and solar, unless you want to wallpaper every square inch of many states,” said Christian Back, vice-president of nuclear technologies and materials at General Atomics. “It’s not efficient enough.”

    https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/The-Downfall-Of-US-Nuclear-Power.html

  8. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 7:52 am 

    Madkat

    China is the worlds largest oil importer and when the global oil shortage hits in a few years..they are done..You dumbshit they are going to get hammered the hardest.

    Wait and see you

    https://imgur.com/a/pYxKa

  9. twocats on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 7:55 am 

    great article – lets acknowledge that please that this article has more truth in it than 20 bloomberg, oilzone, forbes, wsj, cleantechnica or whatever red-meat grist usually graces the pages of this website.

    let’s not just haul off and attack each other and start a fifty message thread of personal attacks. please – i’m asking nicely.

    the world needed another “saudi arabia” and it found half of one in the United States LTO – it’s producing around 5 mbpd. The OPEC “Big 5” are producing an extra 5 mbpd since 2008. Throw in Canada and Russia and that’s why modern industrial civilization has sputtered along. its not a big mystery. did I think it would last this long? from 2005 to 2010 I absolutely did not. I’ve been more sanguine since then. I was wrong – I’m okay with that.

  10. Duncan Idaho on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 8:42 am 

    The fast food, football, and Ford F-150s still exist, enjoyed without a care in the world by the overfed, apathetic, and ignorant masses.

    We will see when that Fall starts roaring.

  11. Cloggie on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:26 am 

    “The downfall of US nuclear power“

    https://www.rt.com/business/433140-downfall-of-us-nuclear-power/

    “A new, shocking report discovered that the US nuclear power industry could be on the verge of a collapse — a reality that many have yet to realize.

    The report was issued by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University’s Department of Engineering and Public Policy (EPP), Harvard University, and the University of California San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy.”

    Imagine how shocked the Russians are.

  12. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:34 am 

    “A new, shocking report discovered that the US nuclear power industry could be on the verge of a collapse — a reality that many have yet to realize.”

    BS, this is just more RT extremist drivel. The US nuk industry may be in decline but it is too systematically connected and too large a contribution to the US energy grid to be on “verge of collapse” More nonsense from the neder and his cherry picking games.

  13. Cloggie on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:40 am 

    We already discussed this:

    https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/u.s._nuclear_power_the_vanishing_low_carbon_wedge

  14. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:46 am 

    “verge of collapse” neder?? extremist???? quit your cherry picking nonsense.

  15. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:07 am 

    Davy

    That article was from oilprice..RT just reprinted it..maybe if you would have read it instead of sticking your fingers in your ears..you would have know that..It links to a study done by the US national Academy of sciences..you dumb stupid ignorant farmer

    The Downfall Of U.S. Nuclear Power
    https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/The-Downfall-Of-US-Nuclear-Power.html

  16. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:09 am 

    Davy

    Your mind doesn’t have the scoop for collapse topics..I dont know why you spend all your precious last moments on earth before you die from the collapse on this blog..

  17. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:18 am 

    mm, you stupid uneducated millennial your cherished academia is bought and sold these days per the agenda de jour. NUKE power is here to stay for many years just as coal is. It may be in decline and it may collapse someday along with everything. The more you open your mouth the more stupid the noise.

  18. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:19 am 

    France scores! Go Macron! Go Migrants!

    In your face clogg you scummy peckerwood!

  19. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:23 am 

    Davy

    You sound like madkat..Its bought and sold huh? By who George Soros? You are tin foil hat nut job..The US national academy is 85% funded by the American public..You stupid moron..

  20. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:28 am 

    Davy

    You are a great example of what happens to a person when they are handed everything in life and don’t have to work for anything..you become soft and spoiled and ignorant..
    .

  21. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:32 am 

    Mm, you are a naive uneducated millennial with too much time on his hands. I have seen next to nothing legitimate and informational out of you that is on topic and relevant IOW you are noise. You are here for selfish reasons mostly to satisfy your ego. For some reason you think you impress people but the reality is every intelligent regular here thinks of you as an irritant.

  22. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 10:48 am 

    Davy

    I earned a PhD in Quantum Chemistry from Michigan..I work for a university…but I am not educated..?

    The mental gymnastics you pull are astonishing..You are no better than Madkat..Just another stupid hick lard ass peckerwood..

  23. Davy on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 11:06 am 

    You didn’t earn shit you lying piece of shit. You are all talk and this is the Internet. You resemble a mental institution patient spending his day surfing the net. Intelligent people can determine lies, fakes, and frauds. You are all three, mm, combined with egotistical depravity. If the collapse comes. I hope you get the worst of it. I hope you squeal like a pig and whine like the dumb kid you are when your last minutes ebb away.

  24. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 11:12 am 

    Davy

    No, you didn’t earn nothing..It was all given to you by your wealthy parents..I worked my way through college..And have worked since I was 14..

    And you are not an intelligent person or you wouldn’t link to zerohedge..Intelligent people don’t do that Davy..

    And I won’t get the worst of collapse because I have an exit plan so I don’t have to suffer..

  25. JuanP on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 1:03 pm 

    We have 800,000,000 more people in the world. And, in the last ten years we consumed more resources than in any previous decade and produced more pollution than ever before, too. The global situation is considerably worse today. I will take every day, though!

  26. print baby print on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 2:50 pm 

    nice one twocats

  27. joe on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 3:54 pm 

    Once iran goes offline there’s no way we can survive an oil price spike. A hike in inflation forces a spike in interest rates, and that my friends will be cancer to the tight oil sector. The real winners of 100 dollar oil will be banksters. And of course Brexiteer/Cloggie types.

  28. joe on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 4:03 pm 

    Also Saudi Aramco is hoping to sell shares on the public market so for 40-100 bln outlay you get to buy 5% of a company whoes owners are gangsters that shake down its subjects in luxury hotels. Yeah, I feel much safer about global oil reserves.

  29. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 4:05 pm 

    Joe

    Saudi Arabian oil reserves are overstated by 40% – Wikileaks
    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/feb/08/saudi-oil-reserves-overstated-wikileaks

    Saudi’s are going to peak soon and collapse.

  30. Outcast_Searcher on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:22 pm 

    If minimind only had an IQ point for each time he falsely called for a collapse soon.

    As it is, he only has a big useless pile (and bad reputation for) nonsensical predictions.

  31. MASTERMIND on Sun, 15th Jul 2018 9:33 pm 

    Outcast

    I have said the same thing over and over again..The collapse will happen within the next decade..I have cited dozens references..I even made manifesto..
    https://imgur.com/a/pYxKa

    Sorry, your straw mans have no power here!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *