Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on October 20, 2015
Peak Oil, Fascism, and Genocide
In this broadcast, we examine the fascistic, genocidal underbelly of the Peak Oil doctrine—one which asserts that the world is running out of oil and that drastic measures must be taken as a result. The Peak Oil phenomenon is discussed in FTR#’s 478, 506. A paper written and published by leading figures in the Peak Oil movement advocates a draconian, eugenic program of systematic murder in order to reduce the world’s population sufficiently to meet the alleged threat of Peak Oil. In addition to eliminating civil rights and most of the basic tenets of popular democracy, the paper advocates getting rid of the vast majority of the earth’s population over the period of the next century and a half. What the paper does not spell out is just who will make the decisions as to who lives, who dies and who gets to reproduce? The conclusion of the program reviews the Nazi heritage of the Peak Oil movement. Note that the subject of Peak Oil will be discussed at greater length in future programs.
Program Highlights Include: Discussion of the epicenter of the Peak Oil movement—IHS Energy Group; IHS Energy Group’s status as a subsidiary of Thyssen-Bornemisza industries; review of Thyssen-Bornemisza’s links to the Third Reich and the Bush family; review of the Bormann capital network’s pivotal stock holdings in Standard Oil; review of the fact that IHS Energy Group uses data fed to it by the petroleum companies to justify the Peak Oil deception, which justifies enormous profits for those companies!!
1. Much of the program consists of the reading of a truly horrifying, evil document, presented in the Association for the Study of Peak Oil Newsletter and defended by Colin J. Campbell, that periodical’s leading figure. The document speaks for itself—it advocates a murderous, genocidal “New World Order” as a solution to the dubious question of Peak Oil. It is beyond the scope of the present discussion to delineate all the flaws in the hypothesis of Peak Oil. Some of these are set forth in FTR#’s 478, 506. Others will be dealt with in the future. It should be noted in passing that a combination of predictably increased global demand stemming from the rapidly increasing industrialization of China and India and deliberately reduced refining capacity, particularly in the United States, has resulted in the enormous increase in petroleum and gas prices. As discussed in FTR#’s FTR#’s 478, 506, the data used by IHS Energy Group to generate the statistics underlying the Peak Oil deception come from the oil companies themselves! Suffice it to say for the purposes of the present discussion that the author of the document—one William Stanton—presents an argument that makes consummately presumptuous judgements, and then proceeds on the basis of those erroneous judgements to draw some utterly monstrous conclusions. The document advocates a eugenic approach to humanity, eliminating the majority of the world’s population in the name of ecological necessity. One should not fail to note that the genocidal eugenic nature of this document is in perfect keeping with the Nazi programs of extermination, in turn derived from the international eugenics movement. (For more about the eugenics movement, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 32, 102, 254, 312, as well as three interviews with Wesley J. Smith [FTR#’s 117, 124, 141.] A detailed overview of the eugenics movement is contained in Miscellaneous Archive Show M12—available from Spitfire.) Stanton’s Nazi screed begins with a characteristically flawed assumption–that the increase in the world’s population is due to oil. There are many factors, including the discovery of antibiotics, the discovery of the germ theory of disease, major advances in plant and animal hybridization, irrigation and other agricultural techniques, as well as political and economic reform. In addition, throughout the document, Stanton (like his fellow “Oily Peakers”) ignores major advances in alternative fuels and the role significant conservation and the development of mass transit could have in the energy future of humanity. “The population of the World expanded six-fold in parallel with oil production during the First Half of the Age of Oil. William Stanton, author of The Rapid Growth of Human Population 1750–2000, contributes the following analysis of how population will have to return to pre-Oil Age levels. Let us hope that it does not come to this, but the options explained do have a certain chilling logic.”
(“Reducing Population in Step with Oil Depletion” by William Stanton; Association for the Study of Peak Oil Newsletter; No. 573; July/2005, p. 1.)
2. “Recent articles in the ASPO Newsletter have agreed that the explosion of world population from about 0.6 billion in 175O to 6.4 billion today was initiated and sustained by the shift from renewable energy to fossil fuel energy in the Industrial Revolution. There is agreement that the progressive exhaustion of fossil fuel reserves will reverse the process, though there is uncertainty as to what a sustainable global population would be.” (Idem.)
3. “In this time of energy abundance, and the complacency it engenders, the vast majority of the general public assumes that what the future holds is ‘more of the same’. They argue, if pushed, that the expertise inherited by post-fossil-fuel scientists and engineers will allow a smooth transition into a new kind of energy-rich world in which renewable generators will produce as much energy as fossil fuels do now. Such a view is untenable because it ignores the fact that almost all materials essential to modern civilization will be orders of magnitude more costly, and scarce, when they have to be produced using renewable energy instead of fossil fuels.” (Idem.)
4. “In 2150, for example, a wind turbine constructed of steel, concrete and plastic may not be able to generate, during its lifetime, as much renewable energy as would have been used up in creating it. Imagine mining, refining and smelting the metal ores, quarrying and transporting the rock, growing the biomass; fabricating the component parts, and erecting and maintaining the structure, using only the trickle of electricity produced by another similar turbine. Vast engineering projects such as constructing the first Airbus A380 airliner (Bowie 2005), using only renewable energy from start to finish, would be unthinkable (to say nothing of flying the plane without oil!).” (Ibid.; pp. 1–2.)
5. “If, in this article, I discuss ways in which a global population reduction of some 6 billion people is likely to take place during the 21st Century, precedent suggests that nearly everyone will ignore me. ‘He must be mad’, media reviewers concluded when they read my first probes into the subject two years ago and effectively blacklisted the book (Stanton 2003). After all, do the world’s leading politicians and their scientific advisers, including highly paid demographers working for the United Nations and other international bodies, ever doubt that economic ‘business as usual’ will continue for the foreseeable future?” (Ibid.; p. 2.)
6. “But, given that ASPO is successfully challenging conventional wisdom on oil depletion (there were four anxious letters on the subject of peak oil in my local weekly newspaper in May), what are the options? The first and most likely scenario is rejection. People in high places view an alleged need for population reduction with incredulity, scorn and denial. In consequence, the price of fossil fuels, especially oil, goes on rising without causing serious alarm in the West, except perhaps in the business world.” (Idem.)
7. “When, probably before 2010, the price is so high that construction of new airliners, airport terminals, Olympic villages and traffic reduction schemes shudders to a halt, uncontrollable inflation and recession will spread round the world. The oil price may stabilize for a while, as manufacturing wilts, along with demand for its products. In Third World nations, without oil, that can neither buy food nor grow it in adequate quantity without mechanized agriculture, a Darwinian struggle for shrinking resources of all kinds will be in full swing. Tribe against tribe, religion against religion, family against family, the imperative to survive will be driving strong groups to take what they want from weak ones. The concept of human rights will be irrelevant: ‘How can the weak have rights to food, when there is not enough even for the strong’?” (Idem.)
8. “It may well be that, in the West, the same argument will affect the thinking of militarily powerful nations. ‘If billions must die, and we have the technology to ensure that they are others, not us, why should we hold back’? Instantaneous nuclear elimination of population centers might even be considered merciful, compared to starvation and massacres prolonged over decades. Eventually, probably before 2150, world population will have fallen to a level that renewable energy, mainly biomass, can sustain. It is likely to be similar to the population before the Industrial Revolution. That is the do-nothing, let Nature take its course, scenario, involving more than a century of immeasurable human suffering. What alternatives are there? They have to be scenarios in which enlightened governments and their peoples, with astonishing foresight and determination, take positive action to reverse population growth by new, Draconian, laws. China has pioneered such an approach, by its one child per family policy.” (Idem.)
9. “ASPO’s Oil Depletion Protocol (Campbell 2004) is a scenario that aims to persuade national governments to cope with declining oil production equitably and peacefully, on the world scale. An annual depletion rate (the percentage of remaining global oil reserves produced each year, currently about 2.5% per year) is calculated by experts, after which nations agree to reduce their consumption and/or production of oil year after year strictly in accordance with the depletion rate. How population reduction will be achieved in step with growing oil shortage is not spelt out. Some will see the Protocol as too idealistic for a Darwinian world, because it expects every nation to co-operate regardless of whether they are resource rich or poor, have a high or a low birth rate, or are responsibly or chaotically governed.” (Idem.)
10. The murderously totalitarian, fascist nature of the Peak Oil doctrine is evident in the following passage. “Probably the greatest obstacle to the scenario with the best chance of success (in my opinion) is the Western world’s unintelligent devotion to political correctness, human rights and the sanctity of human life. In the Darwinian world that preceded and will follow the fossil fuel era, these concepts were and will be meaningless. Survival in a Darwinian resource-poor world depends on the ruthless elimination of rivals, not the acquisition of moral kudos by cherishing them when they are weak. In fact, human civilization in the fossil fuel era has been totally anomalous, fuelled by the unthinking exploitation and exhaustion of all the world’s resources, not just fossil fuels. Sir Fred Hoyle pointed out, decades ago, that Western civilization was a ‘one-shot affair’, for this reason (Duncan 1997).” (Ibid.; p. 3.)
11. “So the population reduction scenario with the best chance of success has to be Darwinian in all its aspects, with none of the sentimentality that shrouded the second half of the 20th Century in a dense fog of political correctness (Stanton 2003 page 193). It is best examined at the nation-state scale. The United Kingdom will serve as the model. To those sentimentalists who cannot understand the need to reduce UK population from 60 million to about 2 million over 150 years, and who are outraged at the proposed replacement of human rights by cold logic, I would say ‘You have had your day, in which your woolly thinking has messed up not just the Western world but the whole planet, which could, if Homo sapiens had been truly intelligent, have supported a small population enjoying a wonderful qualify of life almost for ever. You have thrown away that opportunity.’” (Idem.)
12. Note the explicitly eugenic orientation of the Peak Oil advocates: kill people born with disabilities, just like the Nazis! “The Darwinian approach, in this planned population reduction scenario, is to maximize the well-being of the UK as a nation-state. Individual citizens, and aliens, must expect to be seriously inconvenienced by the single-minded drive to reduce population ahead of resource shortage. The consolation is that the alternative, letting Nature take its course, would be so much worse. The scenario is: Immigration is banned. Unauthorized arrives are treated as criminals. Every woman is entitled to raise one healthy child. No religious or cultural exceptions can be made, but entitlements can be traded. Abortion or infanticide is compulsory if the fetus or baby proves to be handicapped (Darwinian selection weeds out the unfit). When, through old age, accident or disease, an individual becomes more of a burden than a benefit to society, his or her life is humanely ended. Voluntary euthanasia is legal and made easy. Imprisonment is rare, replaced by corporal punishment for lesser offences and painless capital punishment for greater.” (Idem.)
13. “A rough calculation suggests that by following these Draconian but simple rules UK population could be reduced by 5 to 10 million during the first ten years, without excessive pain (compared to the alternatives). If this was thought too fast or too slow, there would be scope for modifying the child entitlements. The punishment regime would improve social cohesiveness by weeding out criminal elements. UK military forces should be maintained strong and alert, given that other nations working to different scenarios, or to none, would certainly attempt Darwinian piracy on UK trade routes, or mount mass immigration invasions of UK coasts. Collaboration with other nations practicing the same population re
duction scenario would be of great mutual advantage.” (Idem.)
14. “Initially the greatest threats to UK security would come from rogue nations unwilling to curb traditionally high birth rates but lacking the means to feed the ever-growing numbers of new mouths. In the past, these were the poverty-stricken nations that repeatedly received humanitarian aid and famine relief, which did nothing to reduce the birth rate. In a Darwinian world. Nature would take its course. In consequence, their populations would reduce particularly fast and their threat would fade away. After four or five decades the populations of the UK and other nations following the same scenario would probably be halved. In the rest of the world, where Nature was doing the reduction in an ambience of massacres and destruction, the proportionate fall would be greater and the pain would have been terrible. In the UK, in contrast, where orderly population shrinkage would have outpaced resource shrinkage, a relatively comfortable quality of life would have been enjoyed throughout the period. There would have been no toss of technological expertise, but it would no longer be employed in grandiose energy– wasteful projects. Instead, there would be intensive research into cost-effective methods of renewable energy recovery.” (Ibid.; pp. 3–4.)
15. “A particular problem could arise from the fact that the world’s greatest oil reserves are controlled by the nations surrounding the Gulf. They have dizzyingly high birth rates, which, for cultural reasons, they might not want to lower. Their populations exploded following the discovery of oil, and if the explosion continues, even a very high oil price will not provide enough national income to prevent general poverty. Indeed, the demand for Gulf oil might occasionally fall. If for example alternative sources were still available to nations practicing orderly population reduction, and there was minimal demand from the chaotic rest of the world. After a decade or two of unrestricted population growth, with limited income from oil and terrible shortages, especially of water, Nature will begin to reverse population growth around the Gulf.” (Ibid.; p. 4.)
16. “Of course, in a Darwinian world, a militarily powerful nation might try to take oil by force anywhere on the planet. World War Two provided recent examples: oil supply being critical to Germany and Japan. Another problem is likely to be the residual opposition to population reduction from sentimentalists and/or religious extremists unable to understand that the days of plenty, when criminals and the weak could be cherished at public expense, are over. Acts of violent protest, such as are carried out today by animal rights activists and anti-abortionists, would, in the Darwinian world, attract capital punishment. Population reduction must be single-minded to succeed.” (Idem.)
17. Next the program reviews an excerpt from an article about the epicenter of the Peak Oil doctrine—IHS Energy Group (formerly Petroconsultants). It is altogether significant that the data produced by IHS Energy Group/Petroconsultants is fed to the outfit by the very petroleum and geological engineering firms that stand to benefit from the alleged scarcity of oil!! “ . . . The leading trio of Jean H. Laherrere, Colin J. Campabell, and L.F. (Buz) Ivanhoe have worked for, or with, the leading firm modeling oil fields, Petroconsultants of Geneva. Since the 1950’s, they [Petroconsultants] have been fed data on oil exploration and production by just about all the major oil companies, as well as by a network of about 2000 oil industry consultants around the world. They use this data to produce reports on various matters pertinent to the oil industry, which they sell back to the industry. ‘This much is known, Kenneth Deffeyes writes, ‘the loudest warnings about the predicted peak of world oil production came from Petroconsultants’”
(“The Coming Panic over the End of Oil—Coming to a Ballot Box Near You’ by ‘Scoop’, Section News; Posted on 12/24/2003 by Walt Contreras Sheasby.)
18. IHS Energy Group is a subsidiary of the Thyssen-Bornemisza industrial group, a core element of the Bormann capital network and the Underground Reich. For more about the Thyssen connections to the Bormann group, the Underground Reich and the Bush family, see—among other programs—FTR#’s 273, 305, 361, 370, 435, 506.) Considering the character of the epicenter of the Peak Oil doctrine, the genocidal, fascist nature of the Stanton document should not be too surprising. The apples don’t fall too far from the tree. In FTR#’s 385, 506, we noted the Thyssen firm’s primary position in the purchase of the Leuna refinery in the former East Germany. That facility had been one of the primary I.G. Farben synthetic oil factories during World War II. What relationship exists between the Thyssen role in the resuscitation of the Leuna facility and the emergence of the Peak Oil doctrine (which began in Germany)? Has the possibility of a more efficient hydrogenation process been used to blackmail the petroleum industry into going along with the Peak Oil scam? Would it have taken much arm-twisting, given the enormous profits for which Peak Oil is serving as justification? This question will be taken up in future discussion of the Peak Oil scam. Note in the context of this discussion, that the Bormann network holds as much stock in the Standard Oil complex of companies as the Rockefellers. For more about this, as well as the massive Rockefeller capital participation in the Thyssen firm, see FTR#506. “In a late 1998 merger, Petroconsultants became IHS Energy Group, a subsidiary of Information Handling Services Group (IHS Group), a diversified conglomerate owned by Holland America Investment Corp., IHS Group’s immediate parent company, for the Thyssen Bornemisza Group (TBG, Inc.). [Emphasis added.] In the 1920’s George Herbert Walker and his son-in-law, Prescott Bush, had helped the Thyssen dynasty finance its acquisitions through Union Banking corp. and Holland-American trading Corp. (Wikipedia, 2003). Until his death last year, Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, the nephew of the Nazi steel and coal magnate, was one of the world’s richest men. . . .” (Idem.)
19. More about the Bormann capital network’s participation in Standard Oil: “ . . . The Bormann organization continues to wield enormous economic influence. Wealth continues to flow into the treasuries of its corporate entities in South America, the United States and Europe. Vastly diversified, it is said to be the largest land-owner in South America, and through stockholdings, controls German heavy industry and the trust established by the late Hermann Schmitz, former president of I.G. Farben, who held as much stock in Standard Oil of New Jersey as did the Rockefellers.’ [Emphasis added.]“
34 Comments on "Peak Oil, Fascism, and Genocide"
makati1 on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 8:22 pm
Unread … unwatched … waste of time.
Skip read and saw stuff I already knew.
It’s ALL about money and power, as usual.
apneaman on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 9:25 pm
Nothing like getting fresh analysis. Like in this video from 2007. Ah well, it’s not like anything has changed since then like a financial crash, faux/1%er recovery or seesaw oil prices and geopolitical maneuvering and the start of another crash. Crash part deux.. or is that denouement?
James Tipper on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 10:25 pm
“In this broadcast, we examine the fascistic, genocidal underbelly of the Peak Oil doctrine—one which asserts that the world is running out of oil and that drastic measures must be taken as a result.”
You should stop reading here, basic geophysics is now fascism! What next? Is gravity keeping the black man down? Find out more at 9 o’clock.
I still love the “peak oil means we’ve run out of oil” strawman. Oil will be here in 200 years, hell it’ll be here in 1000 years, we simply won’t extract it.
They then link to some articles supposedly connecting peak oil to fascism. Who cares? Doesn’t mean peak oil is wrong anymore than wrong predictions about global warming means its wrong. The Nazis also invented modern rocketry so we better shut down NASA. Right…
And what’s all this anti-eugenics shit? All I hear constantly is how stupid people are, it would be vastly superior to have IQ tests of parents and/or limits on # of children to lower future growth. Because God knows we need more fucking idiots breeding!
“Eventually, probably before 2150, world population will have fallen to a level that renewable energy, mainly biomass, can sustain. It is likely to be similar to the population before the Industrial Revolution.”
I’d imagine it will probably be even lower than that and the world will be much worse for them.
apneaman on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 11:16 pm
James, many psychopaths have high IQ’s and so do most of the people of science who work for DARPA et al inventing and improving ways to kill. I would not say that it isn’t important, but if there was a sure fire way to test for empathy, I would make that as the #1 requirement. The select candidates must score high in both. Genius rocket scientist with little empathy? Sorry, your on the next cattle car to the reeducation camp, wink wink. Otherwise the whole thing starts again at full speed 5 minutes after Genesis 2.0
Bankers, lawyers, politicians, Germans (they’re always starting shit), media and financial people are ineligible by default. We can’t take any chances. Better include the overly religious too – including new agers and UFO tards.
GregT on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 11:33 pm
“Because God knows we need more fucking idiots breeding!”
Thanks for the laugh JT. 🙂
James Tipper on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 11:46 pm
@apneaman
You’re right, an empathy test should definitely be included. I’m skeptical in a way though because it’s easy to test for IQ, but very easy to lie on empathy test. Unless you have a Voight-Kampff machine handy that high IQ sociopaths/psychopaths would more than certainly lie to get through.
@gregt
Glad I could help
GregT on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 11:51 pm
You’re on a real roll tonight Apnea. I nearly pissed myself over the B_S thread.
GregT on Tue, 20th Oct 2015 11:53 pm
“Glad I could help”
Still laughing. Couldn’t agree more.
peakyeast on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 12:30 am
I think I prefer eugenics to global nuclear/biologic/chemical war..
I also think I prefer eugenics to destroying the last few % of wild nature and the remainder of the oceans.
But I suppose im an anti-social fascist who would rather have a less destructive and controlled solution than wait for complete armageddon and chaos – while destroying all other higher lifeforms.
MrNoItAll on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 1:12 am
“Because God knows we need more fucking idiots breeding!”
JT, I am quite sure that mother nature is going to handle that for us at some point, probably sooner than the fucking idiots can imagine.
theedrich on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 3:29 am
The whining writer of the above Christian-moralist screed did bring up one notable quote — from now deceased astrophysicist Fred Hoyle. Speaking of the long climb to the modern world of high civilization, Hoyle said: “This is a one-shot affair.”
Hoyle went on to warn, “If we fail, this planetary system fails so far as intelligence is concerned. The same will be true of other planetary systems. On each of them there will be one chance, and one chance only.
… and:
“[I]f we insist on always following the easy path we could end up as a criminal species.”
— Of Men and Galaxies (University of Washington Press: Seattle, 1964, pp. 63-70)
Ever since Darwin, Christianity has made strenuous efforts to suppress the recognition of nature and nature’s laws. Never mind the Scopes trial. Millions of “believers” have asserted, and continue to assert, with heated righteous indignation that we never evolved from apes. Nope. Yahweh produced man in the twinkling of an eye, then extracted a male rib and made the first woman out of it. And anyone who denies that must be burnt at the stake.
Christianity and its stepchildren, modern democracy and Communism, are convinced that the global petrie dish is infinite. The “poor,” especially if they are non-White, must be assisted in overpopulating the earth, and Whites must disappear because they are infected with “original sin.”
The swarthies from Allahland are taking Europe up on this idea and invading Suicidia by the hundreds of thousands as we speak. “Ah, but this will help Euroland grow,” saith Angela the Murky. Forget Hoyle and Darwin. And in the U.S., mud from India, China and other “emerging” lands is drowning what remains of America, long the quintessential Camp of the Saints and now led by a Dark One who hates Whites. Meanwhile, since the mass media will continue to divert the attention of the entertainment-obsessed masses, there is no chance that we can any longer avoid the failure of our planet. For ours was a one-shot affair.
apneaman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 3:59 am
Breeding explains a lot. There are just too many apes. Our behaviour is consistent throughout the historical and archaeological records. The last century was a fucking slaughter fest. Same as it ever was. Kill and eradicate the environment and everything in it without a second thought. Kill our cousins and I bet there were more than just Neanderthals. Kill the other tribe/clan/kingdom/nation state. Once the pie shrinks enough, we will go retro until it’s back to family vs family. This is what we have always done. This is what we are. A century of soft high living in N America and half as much in a handful of other locals does not trump our programing. It simply allowed us to pretend nice for a bit – mostly at home. The only way to conquer your biological programming is to die. This is just evolution. This is why we will never stop consuming and killing for more. It’s not that we don’t wish we could stop – we just can’t. Were that scorpion.
Genocide is as human as art or prayer. — John Gray
The destruction of the natural world is not the result of global capitalism, industrialisation, “Western civilisation” or any flaw in human institutions. It is a consequence of the evolutionary success of an exceptionally rapacious primate. Throughout all of history and prehistory, human advance has coincided with ecological devastation. — John Gray, STRAW DOGS
To those who followed Columbus and Cortez, the New World truly seemed incredible because of the natural endowments. The land often announced itself with a heavy scent miles out into the ocean. Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 smelled the cedars of the East Coast a hundred leagues out. The men of Henry Hudson’s Half Moon were temporarily disarmed by the fragrance of the New Jersey shore, while ships running farther up the coast occasionally swam through large beds of floating flowers. Wherever they came inland they found a rich riot of color and sound, of game and luxuriant vegetation. Had they been other than they were, they might have written a new mythology here. As it was, they took inventory. — Frederick Jackson Turner
The Invaders
How Humans and Their Dogs Drove Neanderthals to Extinction
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674736764
Humans responsible for demise of gigantic ancient mammals
Early humans were the dominant cause of the extinction of a variety of species of giant beasts, new research has revealed.
“Known collectively as megafauna, most of the largest mammals ever to roam the earth were wiped out over the last 80,000 years, and were all extinct by 10,000 years ago.”
http://www.exeter.ac.uk/news/featurednews/title_465673_en.html
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 4:04 am
peakyeast,
“I also think I prefer eugenics to destroying the last few % of wild nature and the remainder of the oceans.”. Exactly.
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 4:52 am
By the way , where can I find a list of my own comments? I have tryed, but didn’t find it any where. Please help
apneaman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 5:02 am
theedrich, Thanks to Darwin we have finally figured out why the white race has regressed to inbred retard status. Not enough genetic diversity. Thats right only fucking each other has fucked us up. See once again, real science trumps your made up ubermensch superior race superior cultural theories made up by dyke ex commie bitch and her fans. World views based on novels are kinda retarded don’t cha think?
Mixed-race relationships are making us taller and smarter: Children born to genetically diverse parents are more intelligent than their ancestors
Researchers analysed genetic information from more than 100 studies
These included details of 350,000 people from urban and rural communities
The team found that greater genetic diversity is linked to increased height
It is also associated with better cognitive skills and higher education levels
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html
Genetic diversity helps humans grow taller and smarter
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/genetic-diversity-helps-humans-grow-taller-smarter-1508824
Is It Better To Be Mixed Race?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZZAckwJHsQ
I think this is at the root of Jungle Fever. Nature’s way of directing apes to the best possible reproductive success by making white boys want to get down with the brown. I can tell you I’ve been faithfully following my natural inclinations my whole life. Have you? Even white founding father Thomas Jefferson knew that. He and Sally’s mixed race genes are all over the US and doing just fine.
DNA Tests Uncover African Ancestry and Surprising Connection to Thomas Jefferson
http://blog.23andme.com/23andme-customer-stories/dna-tests-uncover-african-ancestry-and-surprising-connection-to-thomas-jefferson/
All your anger, grief, anxiety is self inflicted, it’s what you get when you stop listening to your founding fathers and take up with pseudo scientists, pseudo philosophers, novelists and everyone else pandering to your base emotions. The very fact you are here whining about it everyday indicates to me that you are the inferior one. You’re here and the mixed race lawyer is in the white house. If not for the fact we are most likely going bye bye soon, in another century or so the entire species would be beige. Imagine that. I think it’s a good thing that I get these bouts of insomnia from time to time, so I can help you with your little problem.
apneaman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 5:19 am
Klamen, mebe yur speling yur nome wrng?
On front page – top right – search box- type name – hit enter- click on link – key control F – type name in box – knock self out
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 5:24 am
Apne, It’s a little funny that you should mention 23andme, because I have just had a little local campaign against them. Not that I’m against genome technology, but because 23andme are silently working for private ownership of other peoples genomes.
Their slogan “donate your genome to science” is disgusting. This “donation” does not go to science, it goes to a private, somewhat shady company, with unknown consequenses for the donator and his children
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 5:31 am
Apne, Thanks alot.That was real simple, I should have figured that out myself.
But apne , next time try to send me a message in danish, i’m sure you can make it.
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 6:30 am
A lot of people are fighting 23andme and others who try monsanto-style to own human genomes.
The Icelandic populations genealogi is fully documented way back to the middel ages, and genome technology companies are trying to lay their hands on this information. Tills now without succes.
A legal judgement from the Icelandic Supreme Court in November 2003 effectively killed off the HSD (health sector database) project.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCODE_genetics
Davy on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 7:43 am
You guys bring up a good point in the above thread. What kind of human will be most suitable for the future in a postindustrial world? Currently it is those humans who can excel from being smart socially or technically. If you are physically beautiful or strong that is a plus. If you are caring and good not so much. We are talking excelling here. Isn’t that what modern life is about?
Most very smart people I know lack many important skills. They tend to specialize. Specialization is going to be important but it will have to be in a narrow range of activities that are postindustrial. In the initial descent those who will be good with salvage and repair will be in demand. People that can make things work from cannibalization of infrastructure. People that can breed animals for a world where animal power returns. People that can do permaculture agriculture but still utilize some industrial agriculture. You get my point that a new range of skills will become important.
Those who are supper specialized with tech other many modern activities will be S.O.L. There is so many service and leisure related activities there will be no demand for eventually. The super athletes are likely to be wasted effort. People who are just plain tough like an old pickup truck will be more in demand than sports cars. The modern desirability of the disposition of psychopaths will likely not last either. This is true at least the amount of psychopaths crawling around today like spiders. How many mad max bands of psychopaths can we have?
Our society will be under severe pressure. We are going to need cooperation and empathy at least for the local, tribe, and family level. The people that are successful today are not necessarily going to be those successful tomorrow. I imagine it will be those who have lower IQ’s but are more balanced that will prosper. People that are very smart are like horses. Do you think you will need a race horse or a plow horse when society falls apart? Right.
ERRATA on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 9:49 am
Who prints in the US this text? – Neo-Stalinists of the LaRouche movement?
This kind of ideology – it is Stalinism !!
It was called Communism – Stalinism: “Conspiracy Malthusians and enemies of the people”
From this ideology (such ideology) left the Soviet system after 1956.
After the XX Congress of the CPSU /https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_Congress_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union
The main lie that Nazism (Nazism) had something to do with Malthusianism!
The truth is this: In Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Germany was banned abortion!
Hitler met all frantic requests (demands) the anti-abortion movement! (Proliv)
The ban on abortions, a ban on contraception, the introduction / implementation of programs of the great plan of population growth GrossDeutchland plan: 250 million people !!
Economic plans Nazi and Stalinist regimes were derived from / based on plans ProLife! (sic)
– A gigantic economic growth based on the development of heavy industry.
– Enormous population growth
– Belief in the unlimited development
– Discussion about the exhaustion of resources was regarded as decadent and it was banned !!
This kind of plan / type of economy inevitably led to the outbreak of World War II!
In the name of this kind of ideology Soviets they were murdered in the system about .Range from a low of 21 million to a high of 70 million.
This kind of ideology in the Soviet system led to the development of the continuous subsidies for heavy industry, particularly in the mining industry.
This led to a great waste of raw materials and energy !!
Energy waste was rewarding – as “crossing plans”!
The development of industry led to lower the standard of living of the population.
This kind of insane ideology led to the falsification of statistics:
Demonstration / show growth / development, when in fact a decline / fall.
This kind of ideology was extremely anti – intelligentsia / Anti reason
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 10:28 am
As long as you don’t start cloning or cross breeding Ayn Rand and Jerry Lewis, It’s OK with me
ghung on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 10:57 am
It would be nice if the links worked. The ones that do lead to a wild goose chase, and I don’t see an actual source link. Found it here:
http://thecranereport.net/
“Edward H. Crane is widely regarded as one of the driving forces behind the rapidly growing libertarian movement in the United States. Born in Los Angeles on August 15, 1944, Crane holds a B.S. degree from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. in finance and investments in 1968 from the University of Southern California Graduate School of Business. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst.
He worked in Los Angeles as a portfolio manager for the investment firm of Scudder, Stevens & Clark and then as vice president in the San Francisco office of Alliance Capital Management Corp. until 1977. A delegate to the founding convention of the Libertarian Party in Denver, Colorado in 1972, Crane was elected national chairman of the party in 1974, a position he held until 1977, when he co-founded the Cato Institute in San Francisco. He served as president and CEO of Cato from 1977 through 2012, when he became president emeritus.
Today, Ed Crane is president of the Purple PAC, a super PAC devoted to supporting ideas and candidates consistent with dynamic market capitalism (as opposed to crony capitalism), social tolerance, and a skepticism of American attempts to be the world’s policeman. He is also publisher of The Crane Report: Notes from Babylon-by-the-Potomac, a monthly newsletter from a libertarian perspective.”
Just more evidence that we’re in deep trouble.
ghung on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 10:58 am
Testing “blockquote”:
ghung on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 10:58 am
Not allowed here it seems.
ghung on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 10:59 am
….or maybe so.
Davy on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 11:02 am
Alright, G-man, we are never too old to learn. Thanks for the Ed.
claman on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 11:03 am
Davy. I believe somehow that trying to create the perfect man is in vain. There is no “one type fits all” human being, because the social structure and the environment is ever changing.
I’m more in favour of Apne’s thoughts about a big diversified gene pool, where evolution can make it’s pick when ever convenient.
Davy on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 11:05 am
I wish PO had a decent IPhone ap. Whatever they have is geared towards the members forum. Many times the end of the comments are cut off or the page will not expand. I spend 10-12 hours outside so laptop is not an option.
Davy on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 11:09 am
Clam, my thoughts were more a opine on what gifts and talents will be advantageous in a post industrial world. That appears to me not to be what we have today and this points to a disconnect in societies narrative. I am not into social engineering.
Davy on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 12:16 pm
September Was the Most Extreme Month in 136 Years of Heat Records
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-10-21/september-was-the-most-extreme-month-in-136-years-of-heat-records
“Last month was the hottest September on record for planet Earth, according to data released Wednesday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Not only was it a record-breaking September, but it was the largest jump from what’s considered normal for any month ever measured.
In 136 years of global temperature data, we are in uncharted territory. This new milestone follows the hottest summer on record, the hottest start to a year on record, the hottest 12 months on record, the hottest calendar year on record (2014) and the hottest decade on record. And this year’s extremes are likely to continue as a very strong El Niño weather pattern in the Pacific Ocean continues to rip more heat into the atmosphere.”
Sissyfuss on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 2:12 pm
Errata, huh. Is that short for Erratic? Just wondering
Keith_McClary on Wed, 21st Oct 2015 11:21 pm
IHS, home of cornies Daniel Yergin and Michael Lynch is “the epicenter of the Peak Oil movement” ?
Roman on Thu, 22nd Oct 2015 6:52 pm
Ap
Whites and asians have plenty of genetic diversity since they used to be africans and came to europe and interbred with Neandrathals(also killed them). They carry up to 4% Neanderthal dna. There is more genetic diversity in monogamous cultures since more males get to breed.
Since it’s to easy to survive and breed now a days there should be a genetic, physical, and mental screening in order to breed.