Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 19, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The True Cost of Food

The True Cost of Food thumbnail

Forget about the presents and the TV specials, without a doubt my favourite part of Christmas is the food. When it’s this cold outside there’s nothing better than sitting down with some loved ones and eating yourself into a merry stupor. But this year won’t be quite the same for me.

For the past 12 months I’ve been taking a serious look at the reality of our modern food system and the impacts it has on our environment, our health and our communities. It was a sobering experience.

The point of a food system should be to advance our wellbeing, in a way that is socially just and sustainable over time. A system that does so would have some defining characteristics; for example, it would: have a neutral or positive environmental impact; be productive in its use of energy and other inputs; support good jobs; be dominated by short and simple supply chains; foster a positive and thriving food culture and the highest levels of public health; and make food affordable to everyone.

In our latest report we find that the UK food system fails on almost all fronts:

  • It is unsustainable: we estimate the total environmental impact of the UK food system to be in the region of £5.7–7.2 billion per year, or 6.3–7.9% of the market price of food, and probably higher.
  • It is energy-intensive: we calculate that the UK food system uses roughly eight calories of energy to produce every one calorie of energy from food.
  • It supports bad jobs: the UK food system employs approximately 11% of the UK labour force, but most of them are in the least-well-paid jobs, with salaries of less than half the UK average.
  • It is highly complex and opaque: both the decreasing share of total value going to farmers and recent events such as the horsemeat scandal testify to the extreme and increasing complexity of our UK system.
  • It is unequal: all 17 million hectares of agricultural land is owned by about 0.25% of the UK population and the price of an acre of bare land has increased more than threefold from 2004.
  • It is volatile: Britons spend less on food than almost any other EU country, but recent price spikes have hit poor households the hardest.

So we have to ask ourselves: is this system really working in our best interests?

It seems clear to me that we need an urgent and systemic transformation to re-orient our relationship with food towards the goals that really matter to us: wellbeing, social justice and sustainability. To get some inspiration we visited a number of projects throughout Europe where pioneering food producers are building systems that look much closer to our idea of success.

In Germany we learned about circular, resource-efficient energy systems and integrated local supply chains. In Spain we saw how creating good jobs in food manufacturing can strengthen and support vulnerable local people. In Italy we were introduced to the principles of farming in collaboration, not competition, with nature. And back in the UK we experienced the cultural and community dimensions of farming. The overall lesson: good food is possible and it’s already happening. But the examples we saw are the exception to the rule.

Food should be something that we can savour as part of a system that nourishes our environment, our communities and ourselves. Our current food system, which is based on the exploitation of all three, is nothing to celebrate, even at this time of year.

Click here to read the full report 

New Economics Foundation



6 Comments on "The True Cost of Food"

  1. ghung on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 8:28 am 

    In our latest report we find that the UK food system fails on almost all fronts:”

    The little bullet list skipped the part where the UK imports @40% of it’s food consumption. Net food and energy importers may have problems going forward beyond the environmental and social issues with the current food system. Just sayin’….

  2. Bob Tegir on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 11:32 am 

    When ‘social justice’ is part of any plan, run, run quickly, the other way.

  3. Apneaman on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 1:20 pm 

    I needs to eat at least one box of Little Diabetes Snack Cakes, washed down with a 2L of carbonated high fructose corn syrup just to have the energy I need to drive to Walmart and hold myself upright in the complementary electric shopping scooter. I wish they would include a mini hydraulic crane in the scooters with a boom that extends into the cab of my truck for lifting all my heavy bags of high calorie-low cost purchases.

  4. J.R. on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 3:57 pm 

    Moron. Nothing wrong with social justice. The blank exit strategy you propose (for everyone) is based on ignorance and refusal (blind stupidity).

  5. Makati1 on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 7:52 pm 

    Philippine food prices at the markets.

    Milk: Australian $1.69/qt. USD
    Orange Juice: Singapore $1.59/qt Grd.Beef: New Zealand $ 3.70/lb
    Eggs: Lg.: $1.49/doz.
    Rice: $ .50/lb.
    Shrimp 4″: $3.00/lb.
    Chicken breast: $3.20/lb.
    US Black Angus steak: $ 5.60/lb
    16oz. Campbell’s Pork and Beans: $1.49
    Local instant coffee: $1.79/50 cups
    Philippine 70 proof Vodka: $1.60/fifth.

    Just for comparison. I have no idea what US prices are today.

  6. DMyers on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 10:31 pm 

    This matter cannot be taken seriously enough. Food does more than fill. Most importantly, it nourishes. The nourishment part is not optional.

    We are cranking out “food” to fill a massive population. It’s a finicky market. They want for it to taste good.
    Voila! MSG

    They want for their food to have color. Voila! GMO

    They want for their food to be dead but tasty. Voila! The George Foreman Grill.

    Ultimately, the nourishment part is too abstract to matter, and the subject succumbs to a protracted course of starvation.

    Re: Bob Tegir on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 11:32 am

    vs.

    J.R. on Fri, 19th Dec 2014 3:57 pm

    The real question here is why this cynicism on the part of Bob Tegir toward “social justice?” I can only assume that Bob Tegir has had experiences like my own, in which he observed that the proponents of social justice are, all too often, themselves, regular practitioners of social injustice. For example,….Jim Jones?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *