Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 21, 2014

Bookmark and Share

How the collapse of Iraq could actually save oil

If the Baghdad government can keep Sunni militants away from its oil fields, production in Iraq may actually increase—though global prices are still seen staying higher.

Fear that Iraqi oil production could be disrupted by an insurgence by the militants has driven Brent futures up 5 percent in the past 10 days to about $115 per barrel. Iraq produces about 3.3 million barrels a day, and is OPEC’s second largest—and fastest growing—producer.

Citigroup analysts Thursday issued a new report saying the outlook for Iraqi oil is for more production, even with the clashes between ISIS and the Shiite-controlled Baghdad government. ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, has seized a number of Iraqi cities, and was battling for control of the country’s biggest refinery in the town of Baiji.

The key to more production would also be a move by the Kurdistan Regional Government in the north—which has so far stayed mostly on the sidelines while Sunni and Shiite Arabs battle one another—to move toward sovereignty and take control of its own oil exports. Currently, Baghdad contests the Kurds’ right to export crude, and some buyers have been reluctant to purchase from the Kurds for that reason.

“Our base case is in the short run, we do get more oil. That base case is based on the Kurdistan Regional Government maintaining its independence and security and Baghdad maintaining its control over the southern oil field,” said Edward Morse, head of global commodities research at Citigroup.

Citigroup says a fear premium could remain in the price of oil in the third quarter, but Morse said he does not expect to see a price of $120 a barrel for Brent unless more oil is taken off the global market.

“There are cargoes of Angolan and Nigerian crude that nobody wants. The physical market is not as tight as the perception of a price going up by 4 percent. It’s hoarding, in a way, and speculating,” he said. “The physical market has not changed since before the taking of Mosul.”

The energy industry, meanwhile, is meeting in Moscow this week at the World Petroleum Congress. Exxon Mobil Chairman Rex Tillerson was a keynote speaker. Exxon was reported to have moved most employees out of southern Iraq, but it has declined to comment on security issues.

Dan Yergin, vice chairman of IHS, was in attendance at the Moscow conference. He said that prior to the gathering, everyone expected the focus to be on Ukraine. Instead, it’s shifted to the conflict in Iraq.

“The word here is that nothing (regarding production) has stopped, but everybody has contingency plans and is very focused on security even though they’re a hundred miles away,” he said.

The global industry is also watching to see what the U.S. will do in response, he said. President Barack Obama on Thursday said military advisors would be sent to Iraq, but U.S. troops would not return to combat.

Yergin said talk at the conference is also centered on the idea that Kurdistan could move toward de facto sovereignty, and that its relationship with Turkey has been strengthened.

“If this wasn’t happening, one would be looking toward greater Iraqi production coming into the market. What this does is it gives the Kurds a freer hand to pursue their oil production, and in terms of seeking their sovereignty,” he said. “The credibility of Iraq as a state is now at stake.”

The southern, Shiite-controlled oil fields are the richest in Iraq, and they currently produce about 2.6 million barrels a day. However, that number is projected to reach a record 2.8 million barrels by July, and 3 million by year-end, according to Citigroup.

BP CEO Bob Dudley told CNBC this week that BP is actually increasing production in southern Iraq, at the request of the government, though nonessential personnel are leaving the country. Dudley was also at the World Petroleum Congress.

Yergin said Lukoil was also expected to increase production in West Qurna in southern Iraq, where its production could reach as much as 400,000 barrels a day by the end of the year, up from 120,000 barrels a day currently. The northern part of the country around Kirkuk, now under Kurdish control, produces about 400,000 to 500,000 a day, according to IHS.

Separately, the Kurdistan Regional Government-controlled area in northern Iraq exports about 125,000 barrels a day via a new Iraq-Turkey pipeline system and plans to increase exports to between 200,000 and 250,000 barrels a day during July, and up to 400,000 by year-end, according to Citigroup.

Morse expects to see the Kurds try to strike a deal with Baghdad on exports.

“I tend to be optimistic on their being an agreement to do that before the end of the year, long before the end of the year,” said Morse.

According to Barclays, the huge Baiji refinery, out of commission because of fighting, and a nearby 1,320 megawatt power plant are responsible for one-third of Iraq’s refined fuel and nearly 10 percent of its electricity capacity. The refinery is located 130 miles north of Baghdad.

It’s the northern region of the country that provides oil for domestic consumption, while about 90 percent of the oil from the Shiite-controlled south is exported, according to Barclays.

So far, the only reported disruption to the flow of oil out of Iraq is through the 600,000 barrel Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline, which runs from Kirkuk to Turkey. The pipeline has been out of commission for several months due to attacks by militants.

The Sunni-controlled regions of Iraq don’t produce oil.

The view of Citigroup Middle East analysts is that ISIS will not make much headway into the south of Iraq, or as far as Baghdad. Some experts see Iran, a close ally of the current Iraqi government, taking a bigger role militarily if Iraq’s holy cities or capital are really threatened.

Barclays analysts, however, say that while there have been no attacks on southern energy sites, the region is not beyond the reach of militants. They noted that about 11 percent of ISIS attacks in 2013 were reported in southern Iraq, including assassinations, car bombings and others attacks with improvised explosive devices. Kirkuk was the target of just 5.4 percent of the attacks.

“We believe the uptick in unrest in the south, even if oil facilities were spared, would likely accelerate the exodus of foreign oil workers out of the country,” they wrote.

Morse says if the chaos continues in Iraq, the country could continue to produce oil, but not reach its potential as a producer. The southern fields, projected to export more than 6 million barrels a day in the future, may be able to produce only 4 million, because of limits on the ability to export without pipelines.

“It creates in global balances in 2020 a potential 2 million barrel a day supply hole,” he said, noting Iraq is expected to provide 50 percent of the production growth of OPEC. He said, however, the supply picture could change, with Libya at some time coming back online with 1.5 million barrels in whatever form the country ultimately takes.

The southern part of Iraq has the most promise for expanding production since the five supergiant fields in the south account for 60 percent of the country’s proven reserves. According to EIA, an estimated 17 percent of oil reserves are in the north of Iraq, near Kirkuk, Mosul and Khanaqin. It said Iraq estimates its proven reserves at 141 billion barrels.

The Kurdistan Regional Government reports more than 40 billion barrels of proven reserves, according to the International Energy Agency.

CNBC



9 Comments on "How the collapse of Iraq could actually save oil"

  1. Davy, Hermann, MO on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 7:17 am 

    More lobby of plenty” spin and Wall Street “bad news is good news”. Nothing good comes out of civil wars or any wars for that matter. Yet, civil wars are the most destructive and often are about pain more than gain. Infrastructure is wantonly destroyed in the name of pain. Sure the Kurds can maybe try to increase production and distribution of that production but that takes time, capex and a degree of stability. An oil shock will destroy confidence and capex for any Kurdish effort. An Iraqi civil war could spiral out of control quickly. Can stability occur in a civil war? Will the southern oil complex really remain immune to attacks? One bomb in the right place and big issues. The ISIS has captured some good equipment for a great suicide bomb I am sure. Sunni suicide bombs are a weapon of choice by these folks and effective. CNBC is full of shit saying there are cargos of unwanted crude from Nigeria and Angola. This may be a function of refining and economics of distribution but does not reflect the overall market that is growing tighter. Hey, BTFD stupid and don’t ask questions just BTFD and tell all your friends and family that all is well and BTFD. Be happy all is well. Unbelievable growth is ahead with tight oil, the artic, and the transition to Natgas. Happy days are here so BTFD stupid.

  2. Juan Pueblo on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 9:45 am 

    A nice map and some interesting data intermixed with a lot of BS opinions.
    I noticed that reading the name Yergin made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I actually had a physical reaction to the word. He has always impressed me for his capacity to know so much and understand so little. I can’t make up my mind whether the case with him is one of dishonesty or stupidity.

  3. rockman on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 10:26 am 

    Juan – I’ve followed his work for many years. Trust me: he understands the situation very well…including what fattens his wallet and ego. Which, of course, only makes him a greater irritation IMHO. LOL.

  4. westexas on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 10:56 am 

    I guess we could always use the civil wars in Syria and Libya as models.

    From the fourth quarter of 2010 to the fourth quarter of 2013, Syria’s total petroleum liquids + other liquids production fell by 90%, while Libya’s production fell by 80% (EIA).

  5. Davey on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 11:06 am 

    Juan, Yergin is a snake. He knows what is up.

  6. Northwest Resident on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 11:40 am 

    I imagine there are some highly placed people somewhere in the world thinking that since inevitable collapse is drawing close, it is about time to put a plug into all the remaining oil wells in the ME and stop wasting good oil on BAU when it could be put to much better use rebuilding in a post-collapse world. All that’s needed is a civil war here, a terrorist strike there, a little riot and insurrection in a couple of other places and wallah! The oil stops flowing. Mission accomplished. Not to say that there are elites or powerful intelligence operatives who could actually pull off a plan like that — or are there?

  7. Arthur2 on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 4:08 pm 

    Indeed NWR, in the view of our long term interest it is better that the supply interruptions start as soon as possible in order to sabotage BAU. The world should experience the hard way that oil is a very finite resource, the remainder of which should be used to setup a new energy base.

  8. Bob Owens on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 6:45 pm 

    This article is dreaming. All the countries that are in chaos have their oil production go down, usually by a lot. The real road to using less oil is higher prices. The real road to better environmental stewardship is higher prices. Higher prices are the result of chaos, which we seem to have in increasing abundance in our world.

  9. Makati1 on Sat, 21st Jun 2014 10:19 pm 

    I don’t see a resigned West backing away from BAU for any reason. I see a cornered nuclear nation taking the last option, nuclear war. After that, oil will not matter as there will be no-one left to try to recover it. IF anyone survives then next 20 years or so, survival will be the most important thing in their shortened lives. Food, shelter, and water will be dominant. I don’t see a revived hydrocarbon society in the future. Even the distant future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *