Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 3, 2013

Bookmark and Share

A Roadmap to Redesigning Civilization

Toby Hemenway, host of the video Redesigning Civilization — with Permaculture, defines permaculture as a branch of ecological design that employs natural ecosystems as a model. Although most permaculture design relates to food production, its principles can be applied to the management of all human needs, including water, shelter, waste, energy, finance, culture/spirituality and even sports and security. Permaculture-based food production focuses on returning to a “horticultural” method of food production with “food forests” and other self-maintained food systems, as opposed to our current mechanized, open field method of food production. Permaculture relies on ecologically designed gardens, rather than open fields, and mixed crops, rather than monoculture. It also employs the continuous plant succession typical of natural ecosystems, rather than starting with a clear cut every year.

For me, the most interesting part of the film is Hemenway’s discussion of archeological evidence that civilization preceded the Agricultural Revolution (around 10,000 BC). This contradicts the prevailing belief that the agricultural made civilization possible by creating a food surplus. It’s been argued for more than a century that the creation of a food surplus through open field agriculture freed up non-farmers to specialize in higher pursuits, such as art, science, music, religion, and literature.

According to Hemenway, more recent archeological evidence suggests that civilization came first. This includes Venus figurines which have been discovered from 40,000 years ago, religious symbols from 30,000 years ago, evidence of horticulture (plant tending) 30,000 years ago and evidence of irrigation 20,000 years ago.. He also talks about an archeological site in Gokikli Tepi Turkey from 14,000 years ago that reveals that our ancestors were attending large spiritual gatherings of hundreds of people. Feeding large numbers of people simultaneously poses a clear technological challenge. Hemenway suggests that these large gatherings may have been the impetus for large scale open field cultivation. “Agriculture” (from “ager” meaning field) made it possible to produce large amounts of grain which, unlike other foods, can be stored for long periods.

Hemenway goes on to discuss some of the immediate drawbacks of grain-based agriculture (based again on archeological evidence):

  1. Overpopulation, famine, and warfare – agriculture immediately caused a population boom, as grains are the one of the easiest foods to convert to calories. They increase female fertility, as well as allowing for early weaning (breast feeding inhibits ovulation). This population boom made settlements more susceptible both to conquest from neighboring tribes and famine due to failed harvests.
  2. Shorter life span and poorer health – following the introduction of agriculture, people tended to be shorter, suffer from more degenerative disease, and have shorter life spans (by about 20-30%). They also became subject to deadly viral epidemics (such as small pox) transmitted from domesticated animals.
  3. Less leisure time – following the introduction of agriculture, people had to work 60+ hour weeks just to survive. This was in part due to the need to support a priesthood, nobility, and military to protect the grain surplus. A hunter gatherer can generally collect sufficient food in four hours to last him a week.
  4. Agriculture created a fear of nature (of insects, weeds, wilderness, wild animals, and wild people) and a mindset in which people came to see themselves as separate, rather than part of nature.

Hemenway goes on to outline the basic permaculture design principles, with specific examples of their application to all aspects of sustainable living:

  • Catching, storing, and reusing energy and materials, essentially eliminating the concept of waste.
  • Becoming pattern literate – learning to observe ecosystems to see how a small change can have a big effect.
  • Focusing on community and regional self-reliance rather than individual self-sufficiency.

Drawing on real-life examples, the film finishes with recommendations of what viewers can do to facilitate the transition to a “permaculture” lifestyle in their own communities.

Dissident Voice



5 Comments on "A Roadmap to Redesigning Civilization"

  1. kervennic on Tue, 3rd Sep 2013 11:22 am 

    Why saving civilisation.We will do very well without it.

    There was no civilisation before agriculture. There was some incipien mode of surplus production leading to larger tribes and more specialsation and art and more sedentary life. We see this stage in Papua new guinea, some amazonan tribes, in australia and most of all on canada pacifc coast.

    It is the horticole revolution or garden revolution which inspires permaculture. But this is not civilisation sticto sensu.
    Civilisation is the use of agriculture, that is the introduction of field cultivation (ager), plowing and cereals. This enabled the prodction of a huge amount of storable, energetic staple crop that enables warfare and control over a large territories.

    Civilisation outrooted horticole production and hunting and gathering (very often mied) through warfare. We have now solid evidence that agriculture had a demic progression and thus came through violence.

    Agriculture is more powerful than permaculture. It generates more “power” (and usually mo®e money, because you can easily harvest, store, transport and convert monoculture crops) and has to collapse before any other form of alternative can spread widely.

  2. TIKIMAN on Tue, 3rd Sep 2013 11:34 am 

    Redesigning Civilization will never happen. People will not change, ask the people in poverty how they feel about redesigning the planet and climate change?

    They couldnt give 2 shits about it.

  3. BillT on Tue, 3rd Sep 2013 12:06 pm 

    Permaculture is just a variation on hunting/gatherers and that is the direction we are going on our farm here in the Philippines. While there is little wild game left, there are many fruits and nut and veggies to take their place. Meat will consist of fish and chicken for the most part and only on rare occasions. Not a daily diet. With 5 hectares (7 1/2 acres) in a tropical zone, we can grow food year round with proper management. We even have kapok for making mattress pads and pillows, etc. Coffee, chocolate, etc. I could not have those in Pennsylvania.

  4. IanC on Tue, 3rd Sep 2013 5:57 pm 

    Okay, all you Permaculture Haters – calm down, you’re embarrassing yourselves.

    I don’t thing anyone is calling for an all-or-nothing change to permaculture design and principles. Could traditional agriculture integrate some permaculture principles into how they grow food? Sure!

    More importantly, what is the alternative? Permaculture is a philosophy of low impact living (Read: low fossil fuel living) that we will arrive at one way or another. Got any better, realistic ideas?

    Peace… and Peas. 🙂

  5. actioncjackson on Tue, 3rd Sep 2013 11:42 pm 

    First off I’d like to say that that was an excellent presentation, it summed up very well our progression over the past 10,000 years or so. I completely agree with what he suggests regarding permaculture, community, and education, and I think it’s a good first step. We need to flood the nation/world with as many permaculture communities as possible. It’s really the only chance we have of surviving the insanity that is, and will, eventually bring the end of the age of cheap and abundant energy. One of the problems though, like he says, is if one associates survival to the tap, their job, money, the grocery store… Then they will fight to the bitter end to preserve it. And if one sees nature as the provider, the likewise goes, they will defend it to the death. Unfortunately right now the former is dominant, and most likely they’ll carry on their lives willfully ignorant in ardent ferver, despite the warning signs, until it’s too late to react. I’m almost positive that an entire nation dependent on food stamps won’t be practical nor sustainable. When the grain and corn fields become unsustainable large tracks of land will become dust fields. Then they’ll ravage what’s left of the natural environment for food, and yes, they’ll eat all the permaculture. Epidemic famine leading to the death of a large portion of the world’s population.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *