The reason I ask is on another board a guy that supposedly works in an oilfield said that's what it looks like. He used the analogy that it's like packing crushed ice in a cup and then pouring root beer in on top, then poking a straw in to the bottom.
Is that accurate? Are all oil fields this way? It makes sense... it's just that I've never run across this before.
Ayoob wrote:As you make your way down from the top of the reservoir to the middle, are you going through only liquid oil, or are you going down through a rocky sandy sludgy junky mess?
src: the oil drumfrom Kenneth Deffeyes book "Hubbert's Peak" :
Fine grained calcium carbonate mud usually gets consolidated into massive limestones, usually with little or no porosity. . . . . . . .About 10 percent of ancient limestones do have porosity. . . . . . .Most massive and nonporous limestones contain textures made by invertebrate animals that ingest sediment and turn out fecal pellets. Usually the pellets get squished into the mud. Rarely do the fecal pellets themselves form a porous sedimentary rock. . . .I twisted Aramco's collective arm for samples from the supergiant Ghawar field. . . . .Examining the reservoir rock of the world's biggest oil field . . .a small part of the reservoir was dolomite, but most of it turned out to be fecal pellet limestone. I had to go home that evening and explain to my family that the reservoir rock in the world's biggest oil field was made of shit.
Ayoob wrote:I'm going to update this one more time because I don't understand the answers so far. My question is: Could you go swimming in the liquid pool of oil found in the reservoir, or would you bang your head on rock while diving in?
Please, somebody, stick a Yes or a No in here. Or a Yes except when... or a No except when...
Seriously, I don't understand the answers unless you feed me one small spoonful at a time.
Ayoob wrote:Could you go swimming in the liquid pool of oil found in the reservoir
Ayoob wrote: or would you bang your head on rock while diving in?
rockdoc123 wrote:kingcoal....sort of correct. However the biomass you refer to is largely either bacteria, plant material or amorphous organic matter of some other type that is largely contained in mudstones or coals. Marine mudstones tend to be (not always) made up of type II kerogens which are organics formed mainly from marine planktonic material....type I kerogens are very rick petroleum sources and are most often formed in lacustine (lake) environments whereas coals have mostly type III kerogens or humic matter made up of plant matter. the shale or mudstones or coals are subjected to heat during burial and the kerogens are then converted to hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbon is expelled from the shale, mudstone, coal source bed and finds its way into the sandstone or carbonate reservoir via various migration pathways. In some cases this migration can be very short distance in others up to tens or more kilometers.
So what I'm hearing is that if we get lots of biomass in a freshwater environment, we usually get coal. If we get it in a saltwater environment, we get oil and natural gas. Is that what you're saying?
Ayoob wrote:If you tore the top off an oil reservoir, what would you see on top? Would you be looking at a pool of oil, or would you be looking at a layer of sand?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests