[radon]

Aman, work performed is invariable of the slopes and angles, it depends only on the differential of potentials (in other words, height over the surface), as far as the gravity and alike forces are concerned.

Better have a go over physics and geometry books, - with the amounts of the enthusiasm that you radiate you can make a good physicist eventually and invent something bit more practical.

[EnergyUnlimited]

The ultimate gravity engine:

[Timo]

Aman, work performed is invariable of the slopes and angles, it depends only on the differential of potentials (in other words, height over the surface), as far as the gravity and alike forces are concerned.

Better have a go over physics and geometry books, - with the amounts of the enthusiasm that you radiate you can make a good physicist eventually and invent something bit more practical.

Heck! If he radiates, who needs new engine inventions, at all? He should be able to make steam just by looking at a glass of water.

[Timo]

Aman, work performed is invariable of the slopes and angles, it depends only on the differential of potentials (in other words, height over the surface), as far as the gravity and alike forces are concerned.

Better have a go over physics and geometry books, - with the amounts of the enthusiasm that you radiate you can make a good physicist eventually and invent something bit more practical.

Heck! If he radiates, who needs new engine inventions, at all? He should be able to make steam just by looking at a glass of water.

[radon]

Heck! If he radiates, who needs new engine inventions, at all? He should be able to make steam just by looking at a glass of water.

He still needs to be fed.
EROEI, Timo, EROEI...

[radon]

Heck! If he radiates, who needs new engine inventions, at all? He should be able to make steam just by looking at a glass of water.

He still needs to be fed.
EROEI, Timo, EROEI...

[Aman]

Thanks for all your comments.
It's a time for society to change their thought and understand the reality rather than thinking about hypes and mysterious things like Perpetual Motion Machimes.Most of you I think,may take this discussion funnily.But it's not funny for me atleast.Although not detailed,the basic very simple principle (Analogy) discussed on Flickr webpage took me many sleepless nights to think.Sometimes,simple mechanisms turn out to be a great invention,but many times such a simple idea takes lot of effort and time to think about.So it's not as easy as simply seeing a glass of water and convert to steam.

Somebody rightly said:
"Necesity is the Mother of Invention"

[sparky]

.
the late physicist Sakarov had some concept that gravity was created by two bodies intefering
with the " soup " of cosmic radiation ,
the space between them would have less radiations , some having been absorbed by the bodies
the bodies would create a "radiation shadow"

It would create some force pushing them together

Gravity would not be an attractor force , simply an unbalance

very small matter would attract less than large one , each body had their own inertia
( Newton contemplating the apple had the brain storm that the apple was attacted to Earth
but Earth was attacted by the apple in proportion to their respective mass )

Since Sakarov developed the maths for the Soviet H bomb and the Tokamak fusion reactor
he is worth listening to .

It doesn't seems to be the truth but nobody came with a better idea ,
a gravitron parcticle is downright weird , it would make weightless mass possible