SeaGypsy wrote:I asked for your manifesto. Prove you know what you are actually on about. This op proves Nada.
SeaGypsy wrote:There is not one person here who knows what you are on about. Why? Because it Is incoherent garbage.
SeaGypsy wrote:Moron. My marriage has not one iota to do with your complete inability to describe what you are actually on about.
SeaGypsy wrote:Ignore function, unfortunately doesn't completely work. But certainly an improvement.
SeaGypsy wrote:Ignore function, unfortunately doesn't completely work. But certainly an improvement.
Cog wrote:SeaGypsy wrote:Ignore function, unfortunately doesn't completely work. But certainly an improvement.
I find a fast scroll past AD's posts works pretty well. Beats trying to figure them out.
The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part. (1. By bourgeoisie is meant the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour.)
The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom — Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.
. . . .
The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of Nature’s forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground — what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?
Return to Geopolitics & Global Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests