basil_hayden wrote:For those of you are NOT government workers or living in Funville outside of the good ole USA, let me explain the 55 hour week where no drop in the level of performance is seen or can be tolerated.
It's called being independent and proud of it.
This consists of long days finding and doing work, long nights writing reports and proposals, short weekends catching up, to pay the mortgage, put food on the table and keep the lights on. It does NOT include luxuries like health care insurance, 401Ks or retirement in general, planned or paid days off, or God forbid, sick time, or bonuses. It generally does not include steak. It does NOT include having funds to risk in the stock market. It DOES include a lot of networking after hours at meetings of organizations I'd rather not be at.
55's a slow week. Perks? I'm my own master with high skill level and great referrals. But when you solve a customer's problem, the proverbial well is dry and another hole must be found to get water.
Newfie wrote:As I said, there is more than one concept floating around here.
But I think this is the core concept, but try to forget about pay for a moment so you can follow the logic.
5% of our population creates all the food we need in the US. We have a housing excess.
We don't NEED to work nearly as much as we do, we need work to fulfill some personal desire.
We do great damage by consuming, COMSUMING, CONSUMING. Which is why we are called "capitalist" and a "consumer society" All our consumerism is not only ruining our personal lives it is ruining the world around us through resource depletion.
Think about this for a second, if we have excess unemployment why are we looking to extend the retirement age? Doesn't that just make the matter worse?
We are all a bunch of damn fools, self made slaves to our consumerism, toiling away our life to make the upper 1% ultra rich.
A 35 hour work week would be a good start, but that would also require more legislation to assure a livable wage. In short, higher taxes on the super rich. But I have no hope that this will occur. On a personal level many of us can learn to ratchet back our work and live more within our available resources. Although that surely does not apply to all.
Exploring Voluntary Simplicity or Simple Living would be a good start.
Queaks wrote:Basil I agree with you, except I hope you will soon set up your own retirement with a Keogh or an IRA. I opened my first one many years ago when a janitor for a client was retiring and I noticed he had over $100K in his annuity ( I was setting up the systems for disbursement).. the power of compounding does work over time , his pay into it was less than $20 a week, but it grew over 35 years.
Cog wrote:The only one stopping you from working less hours is yourself.
ColossalContrarian wrote:....................
I think once you get into a lifestyle you resist as much as you can to change that lifestyle (as long as it's comfortable). Maybe there are other things we should be doing with our time but for many of us work and day to day hobbies are all we know.
You need to actively practice doing other things with your life, it is your only life, treat it as precious. You are not a commodity to be wasted, at least you should not be to yourself. If that doesn't work, mentally try saying it to your kids, then imagine your parents saying it to you. "Your life is precious, make the most of it, don't waste it.
Start by shooting the TV.
I can go along with simplicity but I can't remain idle without going crazy and I have a feeling many people are like that. I suppose we could all smoke weed and just chill... but not everyone wants to have a cloudy head all the time. This is why we're at a snapping point I believe. There are too many idle minds getting pinched out of work and consumerism and it's a difficult change for some people to make. It would be difficult for me, I admit.
Newfie wrote:"What have I done, is that all there is?" Which is why so many guys drop dead right around retirement age. Practice retirement.
AgentR11 wrote:...............
To be honest, if you can't look at that question, "what have I done?" and find contentedness; you done did messed up but good. Time to get off the bus and start walking in a random direction until you find something that will grant such an answer to that question. Otherwise, you're just wasting your life.
Novus wrote: So in the same example the same small business with 10 employees working 35 hours would only log 350 hours in paid hourly labor. In order to keep their operations up they would have to either pay for 50 hours of over time for the existing 10 employees or hire two new workers.
Either decision will create more jobs because you will either end up with 10 better paid employees which means more cash for the economy
Newfie wrote:Sure, some get it right, others (self included) ?????
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests