think it might be deeper than that. It is only a theory but it seems like a large percentage of a population at any place and at any time will take this kind of attitude
Ludi wrote: I am allergic to debt, so we can't just put things on the credit card. We don't buy anything unless we have money in the bank to pay for it.
Roccland wrote:Ludi - if you knew with 100% certainity that a bone crushing systemic economic collapse - so severe martial law, banking holidays, new currency, mass shortages were all part of a basket of attempted fixes (in my mind none of them will arrest the effects of a crashed economy)...would you still hold on to this belief?
3aidlillahi wrote:What's this psychological process called?
Ludi wrote:I can easily believe the return of debtors' prisons and workhouses is possible. They will just have different names.
Shannymara wrote:I am sorry to hear that.
Roccland wrote:These place will be packaged as "food centers"...those whole held onto their credit score instead of buying food will show up here...to get your mark and your gruel.
Ludi wrote:I certainly won't be showing up to any "food centers."Roccland wrote:These place will be packaged as "food centers"...those whole held onto their credit score instead of buying food will show up here...to get your mark and your gruel.
Denial. Could also be procrastination, but my understanding is that procrastination is often a symptom of denial.
When we hear about a situation in which someone was in need but was not helped by a bystander we think that the bystander is a horrible person, and that surely, we would have done something because we are caring people. But is it possible that the bystander who did not help was a caring person? Not necessarily. Numerous experiments have been done that reveal, oddly enough, that the less people that are around as bystanders in a given situation where someone needs help, service is more likely to take place. In situations with multiple bystanders, one is less likely to notice the victim in need, their problem, and take action (Latane, Darley 1970:364-369). This lack of concern for a critical situation within a group of people is referred to as informational influence. One person sees no one else acting to help, and they themselves think everything must be alright, and do not help. On the other hand, if someone noticed someone in need and they saw someone rush over frantically to render service to them, then the sense of urgency for a critical situation would be higher. Either way, we always face the dilemma of deciding whether a situation warrants our attention. Sometimes we disregard ourselves and decide to help. Other times we take no action in a situation we feel is unclear, and this is referred to as the bystander effect. But not understanding the magnitude of a critical situation is not always the reason for taking no action. In some events the situation is clear and we still do not act. We can see something happening to a person and not act because of our notice of others who are also watching. Our attention is drawn from the victim to the other bystanders and by seeing them just looking on, we fail to act as well. It is interesting to think the mere presence of other people affects our own personal emotion and mindset in an objective situation. In experiments where participants were placed in a situation where they had to decide whether or not to take action for themselves, focus groups with other people aware of the same circumstances failed to act more compared with focus groups in which people thought they were the only ones aware of the critical nature of the given situation (Latane, Darley 1968:217-221)
Roccland wrote:I would encourage anyone reading this that stills has credit...no cash...and no food to buy now on credit.
3aidlillahi wrote:Found it: When we hear about a situation in which someone was in need but was not helped by a bystander we think that the bystander is a horrible person, and that surely, we would have done something because we are caring people. But is it possible that the bystander who did not help was a caring person? Not necessarily. -snip-
So the 6.7 billion on this planet is not just a problem in itself, it's also contributing to the lack of a solution being implemented. Everyone is looking at others for solutions. Citizenry want the government or scientists to act to develop new fuels. Scientists and governments are hoping for people to consume less.
Ludi wrote:The idea of being hounded by creditors gives me the heebie geebies, the gibblies, and the shivering willies all rolled into one.Roccland wrote:I would encourage anyone reading this that stills has credit...no cash...and no food to buy now on credit.
Return to Medical Issues Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests