Pilots at Spanair had threatened to go on strike only an hour before yesterday’s crash.
Threatened with job cuts, they had accused the carrier – which has run up large losses for its parent, the Scandinavian airline SAS – of “organised chaos” and failing to have a proper business plan.
The airline, which has a fleet of 63 aircraft and employs more than 3,500 staff, is leaking money, labouring under the huge cost of jet fuel. The burden of owning Spanair cost SAS a loss of £43 million in the first half of the year.
"Witnesses said the left engine caught fire as the aircraft reached maximum speed and started to lift, causing the plane to crash to the ground and break into two parts.
According to El Pais, the disaster occurred during a second attempt at take off.
An earlier take-off was delayed after the plane's pilot reported a breakdown in a gauge that measures temperature outside the plane, Spanair spokeswoman Susana Vergara said.
It was on the second takeoff attempt that the plane crashed.
An earlier attempt had to be averted after technical issues, which resulted in an inspection of the plane. Passengers were reportedly warned they may need to change planes."
TheDude wrote: Spanair pilots threatened strike an hour before crashThe plane had an annual inspection in January, however.Pilots at Spanair had threatened to go on strike only an hour before yesterday’s crash.
Threatened with job cuts, they had accused the carrier – which has run up large losses for its parent, the Scandinavian airline SAS – of “organised chaos” and failing to have a proper business plan.
The airline, which has a fleet of 63 aircraft and employs more than 3,500 staff, is leaking money, labouring under the huge cost of jet fuel. The burden of owning Spanair cost SAS a loss of £43 million in the first half of the year.
AirlinePilot wrote:Speculating immediately after any crash is one of the most assinine and childish things I see the press do. It happens every time there is a major air disaster. Your all smart enough in here to know not to do exactly that.
There is little hard information yet other than that an MD-80 series aircraft had some sort of major problem which caused it to go down shortly after it got airborne.
I fly the type, and there are many things which could cause such a problem. Stop speculating and let the investigators do their job.
lorenzo wrote:We're trying to go beyond the mere technicalities of this crash here. We're trying to look at context.
The exact cause of the crash doesn't interest me.
Lighthouse wrote:You guys are completely nuts. I'll give you that.
What comes next? Lorenzos girlfriend does not sleep with him anymore.
The reason: Peakoil and high fuel prices.
Madpaddy wrote:For above post, insert Ireland instead of Spain and you get the picture here as well. Muuhahhahahhahhaahahhahahahahahah
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests