in most of cases the "apparent" power measured seems greater than the heat dissipated by Joule's effect in the RLoad
MarkR wrote:The guy's measurements of output power are wrong by a factor of 10. He's systematically miscalibrated his current measurments so that they are 10 times the actual value.
duff_beer_dragon wrote:Free energy is the same mechanism as immortality -
duff_beer_dragon wrote:
2. Thermodynamics? well since you brought it up........
"energy cannot be destroyed or created" - really? you went back and checked how the universe began, if it did begin
In the inflationary theory, matter, antimatter, and photons were produced by the energy of the false vacuum, which was released following the phase transition. All of these particles consist of positive energy. This energy, however, is exactly balanced by the negative gravitational energy of everything pulling on everything else. In other words, the total energy of the universe is zero! It is remarkable that the universe consists of essentially nothing, but (fortunately for us) in positive and negative parts. You can easily see that gravity is associated with negative energy: If you drop a ball from rest (defined to be a state of zero energy), it gains energy of motion (kinetic energy) as it falls. But this gain is exactly balanced by a larger negative gravitational energy as it comes closer to Earth’s center, so the sum of the two energies remains zero.
The idea of a zero-energy universe, together with inflation, suggests that all one needs is just a tiny bit of energy to get the whole thing started (that is, a tiny volume of energy in which inflation can begin). The universe then experiences inflationary expansion, but without creating net energy.
What produced the energy before inflation? This is perhaps the ultimate question. As crazy as it might seem, the energy may have come out of nothing! The meaning of "nothing" is somewhat ambiguous here. It might be the vacuum in some pre-existing space and time, or it could be nothing at all – that is, all concepts of space and time were created with the universe itself.
djd wrote:MarkR wrote:The guy's measurements of output power are wrong by a factor of 10. He's systematically miscalibrated his current measurments so that they are 10 times the actual value.
I didn't spot this, and I still don't see it. Would you mind explaining how you deduce the miscalibration?
duff_beer_dragon wrote:1. it is not up to me or anyone else to produce proof for you, based on your criteria of what constitutes proof
you have made a leap in deductive thought by not seeing that your own basis of rules has never been proven true.
duff_beer_dragon wrote:it is not up to me or anyone else to produce proof for you
djd wrote:However, actually employing this as a debating tactic is generally a cop-out. Besides, our civilization is built on realism - and if you'll accept arguments in other systems, I've got a gold-making machine I want to sell you. Sure, other people will tell you it doesn't work, but all you have to do is believe in it and it will work for you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests