Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Oil Balance Outlook For 4Q05

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

The Oil Balance Outlook For 4Q05

Unread postby JLK » Sat 14 May 2005, 14:35:00

Matthew Simmons is now predicting that global oil supply in the fourth quarter of 2005 (4Q05) will be unable to meet anticipated demand. Specifically, he predicts that 4Q05 demand will be between 86 and 87 Mb/d, and that supply will be 2-4 Mb/d short of that. He believes that crude oil stocks will have to be drawn down by 180-360 millions barrels to balance the market.

The April 12 IEA Full Oil Market Report is in agreement with Mr. Simmons as far as the demand end is concerned, predicting 4Q05 demand of 86.1 Mb/d, despite a recent slowdown of the rate at which China's demand is increasing. Despite OECD crude oil stocks (this refers to crude oil that is being stored by the major industrialized countries) being higher in 2005 than they were in 2003 and 2004, Brent crude oil futures are in contango all the way out to the December 2005 delivery date, indicating an expectation of a tighter oil market at that time. In 2004 at this time, Brent futures to December 2004 were in backwardation, which was consistent with an expectation that prices would ease. Commodities investors seem to anticipate that demand for the light sweet Brent crude will at least challenge supply in 4Q04, although not to the extent predicted by Mr. Simmons.

The April 2005 IEA OMR included some explanatory commentary on the contango for future crude delivery contracts.

While a crude price above $55 and a contango structure may have appeared a paradox a year ago, the current limited spare production capacity, lag between investment and output and the subsequent need to hold stocks makes such a structure seem more logical. This is not simply a case of building crude or product stocks during “off season” demand, but also looking to have sufficient reserves to meet periods of above trend annual demand growth.....

Current high prices are not just the sum of current supply and demand, but are also a reflection of expectations of future needs. When we reach that future, there should, under current demand projections, be additional supplies from stocks available.


In other words, even the IEA expects that stocks will have to be drawn down in the future to meet not only normal seasonal fluctuations in demand, but to handle normal secular demand growth.

Earlier this year, Saudi Arabia abandoned its long time policy of closely watching the level of OECD stocks and reducing production when high stock levels threatened to erode support from the desired OPEC market price band. The Saudis no longer seem concerned that excess stocks will soften the oil market price, and in fact seem to be encouraging a buildup of stocks to head off a potential supply crunch in the fourth quarter. This is consistent with both Mr. Simmons' outlook and that of the IEA.

Assuming that the IEA's 86.1 Mb/d demand prediction will hold, to what extent will global production in 4Q05 be inadequate to satisfy that demand? In March 2005, global production totaled 84.24 Mb/d, with 50.40 Mb/d coming from non-OPEC sources and 33.84 from OPEC. The IEA Report estimated that OPEC had an additional sustainable production capacity in March of 1.86-2.36 Mb/d, which would be reduced to 1.03-1.53 Mb/d if troubled producers Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria and Indonesia are excluded. Using the latter figure, OPEC's maximum sustainable production capacity as of March 2005 was estimated at 35.37 Mb/d. The IEA expects non-OPEC production by 4Q05 to rebound to 51.88 MB/d as issues in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere are resolved, and new projects such as the ACG megastructure project in Azerbaijan, which started production in mid-February and is expected to average 410 kb/d in 2005, contribute to non-OPEC production. Assuming that OPEC's sustainable production in 4Q05 remains what it was in March 2005, global oil production in 4Q05 could total 87.25 Mb/d, which is more than enough to satisfy the IEA's projected demand of 86.1 Mb/d, or even Mr. Simmon's high demand figure of 87 Mb/d.

Moreover, the ODAC Megaprojects 2004 analysis projected that about 3.4 Mb/d of new production capacity will be coming online in 2005. The non-OPEC component of these new projects was incorporated into the 51.88 Mb/d IEA 4Q05 figure. The OPEC projects slated for completion in 2005 included Nigeria's Bonga South (RD Shell; 250 kb/d) and Erha (ExxonMobil; 150 kb/d) oilfields, Venezuela's Corocoro Phase I offshore field (ConocoPhillips; 50 kb/d), Abu Dhabi's NEAD project (Adnoc; 110 kb/d), and Kuwait's GC-15 project. According to the EIA, the Erha field is presently not expected to come online until 2006 to 2007. Corocoro development was held up somewhat by a dispute between ConocoPhillips and the Venezuelan government, but that has been settled. It is unclear whether production will in fact commence in 2005. According to OPEC, the NEAD project will begin producing in 2005. OPEC estimates that a total of about 1.6 Mb/d of net capacity will be added in 2005. If this is correct, world supply capacity by the end of 2005 could be 88.85 Mb/d, which is much more than is necessary to meet projected demand.

Why then have the futures markets and even the Saudis been acting as if there will be a supply crunch later this year? I think the answer lies partially in fears of political stability in Iraq, Nigeria and Venezuela, a fear of open conflict between the United States and Iran and perhaps most of all the fact that much of the marginal production capacity increases in recent years have come from heavy oil or sour oil instead of the much preferred light sweet crude. While Peak Oil may be a few years off yet, production of light sweet crude may be in the process of peaking right now. A recent specification change by China of the amount of sulfur that is permitted in permitted in gasoline has also increased increased demand for light sweet crude. According to a recent OPEC report:

These developments are likely to result in Asian refiners increasingly seeking more lighter crude from West Africa, drawing sweet barrels away from the Atlantic basin and thus further pressuring light sweet benchmarks WTI and Brent, the report said.

In contrast, the prospect for heavy sour grades looks less promising and may even weaken if the high sulfur fuel oil market remains at the steep discounts seen last year. With the decline in global fuel oil consumption by at least 1.5% per year, this situation will likely persist in 2005, adding further pressure on heavy sour grades, the report said.


It appears that absent unforseen geopolitical developments and/or an unanticipated sharp rise in demand, global oil supply at the end of 2005 should be adequate to meet demand. The supply demand balance for preferred light sweet crude, however, will be much tighter than it is for the overall market, and this situation is expected to worsen in the future.
www.searchingforthetruth.com

The truth that is suppressed by friends is the readiest weapon of the enemy.
- Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
JLK
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: East Coast USA

Unread postby clv101 » Sat 14 May 2005, 14:59:29

I thought the Q405 squeeze was a Skrebowski prediction, is Simmons now repeating it? Has Simmons published anything in the last couple of weeks?

I think the Q4 demand predictions could be too bullish - Europe is slowing fast, Italy entered recession in April after -0.4, -0.4 and -0.5% growth Feb/Mar/Apr. France manufacturing output is down 3%, UK high street spending is down, house prices sales are 35% down quarter on quarter...
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Unread postby JLK » Sat 14 May 2005, 16:28:02

civ101, I was too lazy to put in the hyperlinks, but they can be found in this version if you would like to check them.

Original Article
www.searchingforthetruth.com

The truth that is suppressed by friends is the readiest weapon of the enemy.
- Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
JLK
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: East Coast USA

Unread postby EddieB » Sat 14 May 2005, 17:05:07

Thanks for the thorough analysis. I think you're right on the money with the idea of further pressure on light sweet. I wonder how wide the spread will get...
User avatar
EddieB
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: BA PA USA

Unread postby RonMN » Sat 14 May 2005, 18:07:40

If production comes up short even by 2 MBPD...that's over 2% of the demand.

Keep in mind that in the oil shocks of the 70's (early 80's), production was between 3-5% below demand.

This could make for a cold and expensive winter!
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby smiley » Sun 15 May 2005, 03:34:20

The IEA expects non-OPEC production by 4Q05 to rebound to 51.88 MB/d as issues in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere are resolved, and new projects such as the ACG megastructure project in Azerbaijan, which started production in mid-February and is expected to average 410 kb/d in 2005, contribute to non-OPEC production


Moreover, the ODAC Megaprojects 2004 analysis projected that about 3.4 Mb/d of new production capacity will be coming online in 2005.


True but you have to account for the depletion in other reservoirs. World depletion rate is estimated at about 3 percent. That means that we need over 2.5 million barrels just to keep production at the same level.

The ODAC report reports the peak flows of a new project. It takes a number of years for a new project to reach peak flow, so the amount of production that will be available this year will be substantially less than 3.4 MBd.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby JLK » Sun 15 May 2005, 09:42:18

smiley wrote:True but you have to account for the depletion in other reservoirs. World depletion rate is estimated at about 3 percent. That means that we need over 2.5 million barrels just to keep production at the same level.


That's a little high. The ODAC study stated that current net depletion worldwide is about 1 Mb/d per year. This depletion is already accounted for in the IEA numbers, so the final number should reflect that.

The ODAC report reports the peak flows of a new project. It takes a number of years for a new project to reach peak flow, so the amount of production that will be available this year will be substantially less than 3.4 MBd.


This is a good point. I will try to look into this further.
www.searchingforthetruth.com

The truth that is suppressed by friends is the readiest weapon of the enemy.
- Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
JLK
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: East Coast USA

Unread postby Shiraz » Sun 15 May 2005, 12:30:01

JLK wrote:
smiley wrote:
The IEA expects non-OPEC production by 4Q05 to rebound to 51.88 MB/d as issues in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere are resolved, and new projects such as the ACG megastructure project in Azerbaijan, which started production in mid-February and is expected to average 410 kb/d in 2005, contribute to non-OPEC production


Moreover, the ODAC Megaprojects 2004 analysis projected that about 3.4 Mb/d of new production capacity will be coming online in 2005.


True but you have to account for the depletion in other reservoirs. World depletion rate is estimated at about 3 percent. That means that we need over 2.5 million barrels just to keep production at the same level.

The ODAC report reports the peak flows of a new project. It takes a number of years for a new project to reach peak flow, so the amount of production that will be available this year will be substantially less than 3.4 MBd.



The term depletion is used in too many different ways.

In the ExxonMobil graphic that has become popular after appearing on the ASPO website (below), the world depletion rate is estimated at between 4% and 6%. This includes gas as well as oil from memory, but in any case, this rate is analogous to the 3% mentioned by Smiley.

Image

In contrast, I believe the 1Mb/d increasing to 1.25Mb/d reported in the ODAC study refers only to net global depletion in countries whose production is expected to decline. I don't understand why all the categories of depletion they use are either necessary or desirable, but we here would do well to define which type of depletion we are refering to when we discuss the concept.

For mine, I dislike the ambiguity about classification that arises in the ODAC scheme, and find it conceptually simpler when you can just say, yes, total production from current projects declines by 3 or 4 percent YOY.3 or 4% is 3-3.5 Mb/d. Total new production adds up to 3 to 4 Mb/d in a years time. Therefore, the difference in supply-demand balance in 1 years time will be X.

The only reservation I have with this method is that OPEC may be motivated to not report upcoming production to some extent. I'm really not sure, because, on the one hand, OPEC do want to discourage other producers from using more aggressive /barrel price assumptions (thus they should report). But on the other hand, keeping the market in the dark with regard to spare capacity and upcoming projects helps keep the price of crude high perhaps.
Shiraz
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Shiraz » Sun 15 May 2005, 12:50:04

This is relevant here:

ODAC story

some quotes...

Currently, world oil depletion is running at 4-6 percent, according to ExxonMobil. Taking 5 percent of 2004 production of 82.5 million barrels per day (mn b/d) gives a depletion rate of 4.1mn b/d per year. This sounds huge but is in fact correct.


Type 3 Depletion: This occurs when a whole country is in decline, there are no compensating supplies within the country and customers can no longer get all the supplies they require. This means that customers now have to go to an alternative supplier for some or for all of their requirement.


Over the last two years (2003/04) Type 3 depletion was running at around 1mn b/d. However, in the next 2-3 years several major producers are likely to enter Type 3 depletion. These include Denmark, Malaysia, Brunei, China, Mexico and India. This could raise Type 3 depletion rates to around 1.3-1.4mn b/d per year.
Shiraz
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby nth » Tue 17 May 2005, 19:12:08

People can estimate the total depletion, but cannot estimate total increase in production. The only increase in production that can be projected are new large projects and not existing oil fields just drilling more wells to reduce depletion. Also, using enhance recovery methods, the rate of depletion can be reduced.

The main reason people are thinking we won't be able to meet Q4 demand has to do with disruptions. We are bound to have disruptions. 86-87mbpd estimates are based on conservative growth projections. Last year, China blew the number away. This year- China and India will still be expanding and all those oil exporting countries are increasing their consumption. Many of these states have subsidize fuel costs, so growth will not be dampened by rising prices.

Hurricanes and Iraq's need to repair its oil facilities mean reduce production. Pushing market players to gamble that supply disruption will occur.

Also, you are correct that sweet/sour differential is the biggest stumbling block. With sulfur emission requirements due in '05 in europe, india and china and US in '06, non sweet crude is going to plunge.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00


Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron