nocar wrote:My children are 35, 31 and 24 yrs old now, but obviously they each have been newborn once-upon-a-time, and we (hubby and me) never owned a car through our years of parenting in suburban Stockholm, Sweden (and still do not). We did own a car earlier, living in Hyattsville, Maryland (=suburban Washington, D.C.)
Although living car-free in Europe is very different from in North America, all our neighbors had cars, and they believed it is not possible for them to be without, especially with children.
Yes, you have learn to allow the right amount of time dressing them in winter when going to catch the suburban train. Luckily, children adapt, and they learn to know when mommy is really serious about cooperating with these boots right now! Catching the train is non-negotiable.
In Stockholm, all subways, trains and buses take prams and strollers - otherwise things would have been difficult. Children go to sleep in their strollers.
We always had their daycare within walking distance. Actually it was about 800 m or a half mile. After that, at age 7, they walked the same distance on their own.
I can not remember a time when we could not fit the family onto bicycles. Certainly, we put them in baby-seats from six months of age. In Holland, last summer, I saw people transporting 3 children on one bicycle (one in front, two behind) - not legal in Sweden, but in Holland they allow lots of things with bicycles. We had at most one in front, one behind. When #3 was born, the older ones had their own bikes.
We went in taxis too - I do not remember that it was necessary to have babyseats there - perhaps it is now. Visiting friends in other suburbs - we often went there by public transport, and then called for a taxi going home with tired children and tipsy parents at late hours.
The main problem occurred at school age leisure activities, when everyone assumed that children should be chauffeured and ours would not be. That is a sensitive age of feeling 'different', too.
We got the store to deliver groceries, for a fee, for several years.
For some vacations, we rented cars, but it always seemed out car-free vacations on bicycles and tent camping or canoeing (with tents) in Canada were our best vacations.
I believe, that if there is a will, there is a way. Most often, anyway.
nocar
IanC wrote:There are some "sticky-wickets" with going carless. The most obvious being the problems with having small children.
We live in inner Portland Oregon. We have one car - a VW Eurovan actually. I ride my bike to work and my wife rides the bus and we alternate days at work. Whoever is home with the kids, ages 3 and 6, gets the car. Portland is blessed with really good public transportation and that is helpful. We also live centrally, so we can bike or walk to many services, including the grocery store and school, as long as it's not raining too hard.
With that thumbnail sketch, going carless for us would seem easy. The problems arise with the realities of transporting small children: hard to get them ready to be punctual for public transportation, too big or too small for bike seats, too cold or rainy for a bike trailer, they're napping so you can't leave the house or pack them into the bike trailer, they need car seats for taxis, the list really goes on and on.
The other factor with going carless with small children is cost. It takes a lot of time to transport children without a car. This can lead to tardiness or absenteeism at work. Bikes and bike trailers cost money (although the 2nd hand market is pretty good). Then there is the whole real estate market to consider. In Portland, close in neighborhoods are the most desirable so the price for a house or condo is really high. In order to have the home base to facilitate a biker/public transit lifestyle, you need to either be rich enough to buy a close-in house or have gotten into a house before prices rose (like we did, thank God). If you can't afford said property, you need to rent a crappy apartment which means you probably won't be able to logistically make a car-free lifestyle work, or you're living in the apartment as a stepping stone to a better place and probably don't have kids.
There are plenty of exceptions to these observations, but I just wanted to get them out there. It seems like most people who write these somewhat snotty "I'm-car-free-and-so-much-better-than-you" articles are either young people starting out (no kids) or older people with no kids or grown kids. Oh, yeah, or they're wealthy people who have the luxury of having choices.
-IanC
Portland, OR
EndOfSewers wrote:$500 a month for insurance? That's ridiculous. Registration + insurance costs me $46/month. I could license and insure a $700,000 Ferrari Enzo here for under $200/month.
I can see public transport being a lot more attractive when driving is that expensive.
Loki wrote: Flexcar strikes me as something for people with more money than they know what to do with. I certainly can't afford it.
EndOfSewers wrote:$500 a month for insurance? That's ridiculous. Registration + insurance costs me $46/month. I could license and insure a $700,000 Ferrari Enzo here for under $200/month.
I can see public transport being a lot more attractive when driving is that expensive.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests