Ferretlover wrote:The following clause has been added to the COC:
5.3 The staff of this site reserves the right at all times to permanently rescind the posting privileges of any member who, in the sole judgment of the staff, consistently exhibits a posting style that is not in keeping with the general spirit of the site; that appears calculated largely to sow discord among members, or otherwise draw attention away from material more consistent with the overall theme of the site
Schmuto wrote:Seriously, I have no issue with this new "rule" at all, and ban me when you feel yuh gutta dew it.
But this new "rule" is equivalent to an Amendment to the Constitution that says, "all of the foregoing can be superseded by the President as he sees fit."
What this new rule does, essentially, is add a "kill without objective reason" power. The old rules are now nothing more than various admonitions that posters can take to be things that, if done, may lead to execution ( ) of the new, bigger and better rule.
5.3 The staff of this site reserves the right at all times to permanently rescind the posting privileges of any member who, in the sole judgment of the staff, consistently exhibits a posting style that is not in keeping with the general spirit of the site
davep wrote:Has the "general spirit of the site" been defined? Does that include some moderators wading into debates to gush forth their racist bile, yet silencing those who vociferously pursue more progressive agendas? I'd be interested to know what this spirit is meant to consist of, and why this nebulous new rule is deemed necessary.5.3 The staff of this site reserves the right at all times to permanently rescind the posting privileges of any member who, in the sole judgment of the staff, consistently exhibits a posting style that is not in keeping with the general spirit of the site
eastbay wrote:Oh for goodness sakes calm down. Sheesh. I've been participating here for nearly five years including serving as a moderator and as far as I know there wouldn't have been a single case of someone getting nailed due to this added clause.
The point is that as we grow (30,000 members now, and wait until the next serious oil price spike!!) there is the real possibility that we'll attract someone intending harm to the site. It's just a self defense move by the site owners because it's impossible to predict what kind of malicious and destructive nonsense might arise down the road.
This website attracts and welcomes all perspectives. All opinions. As long as these opinions and perspectives are presented and shared in accordance with the COC, of course.
Peakoil.com – Registration
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Peakoil.com” is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “Peakoil.com” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database.
jasonraymondson wrote:This is aimed completely at me.
Ferretlover wrote:jasonraymondson wrote:This is aimed completely at me.
Close, but, don't light that cigar--just yet.
Actually, I would hazard a guess that about 99% of the posters here will never come close to activating that clause against themselves.
Ferretlover wrote:The following clause has been added to the COC:
5.3 The staff of this site reserves the right at all times to permanently rescind the posting privileges of any member who, in the sole judgment of the staff, consistently exhibits a posting style that is not in keeping with the general spirit of the site; that appears calculated largely to sow discord among members, or otherwise draw attention away from material more consistent with the overall theme of the site
eastbay wrote:FL, hate to be contradictory with you... but it's closer to 99.99%.
outcast wrote:Just out of curiousity what prompted this addition? Though I do think the "general spirit" is a bit too vague and should be a little more clearly defined.
outcast wrote:Just out of curiousity what prompted this addition?
Though I do think the "general spirit" is a bit too vague and should be a little more clearly defined.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 128 guests