Steven Chu, US secretary of energy, on Wednesday said that it would not be politically feasible for the country to lower its reliance on oil by raising petrol prices to Europe’s levels through higher taxes or regulation.
In the past Mr Chu, a Nobel laureate, has argued that if the US wanted to reduce its carbon emissions, policymakers would have to find a way to increase petrol prices to levels in Europe. But in an interview with the Financial Times, he said: “At this moment, let me be frank, it is not politically feasible.”
wisconsin_cur wrote:Steven Chu, US secretary of energy, on Wednesday said that it would not be politically feasible for the country to lower its reliance on oil by raising petrol prices to Europe’s levels through higher taxes or regulation.
In the past Mr Chu, a Nobel laureate, has argued that if the US wanted to reduce its carbon emissions, policymakers would have to find a way to increase petrol prices to levels in Europe. But in an interview with the Financial Times, he said: “At this moment, let me be frank, it is not politically feasible.”
FT.com
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Notice how he never said it isn't feasible to raise fuel taxes, just that it is not feasible to raise them to European style levels.
3aidlillahi wrote:Notice how he never said it isn't feasible to raise fuel taxes, just that it is not feasible to raise them to European style levels.
You're lumping past and present statements together. In the past he was talking about raising them to European standards but that doesn't mean that he's doing it now. He seems to be talking just about raising them at all. Link to interview
"Beyond that, I think that at this moment in time of recession, we can't be thinking about additional taxes on oil" around the 1:00 mark.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Drivers can afford to pay higher gasoline taxes to improve their roads, Michigan's top transportation official said while warning more than 125 projects will be delayed if funding is not increased.
State Department of Transportation Director Kirk Steudle on Tuesday estimated motorists would pay an extra 16 cents per week - "a stick of gum" - for every penny increase in the 19-cents-a-gallon gas tax. He urged lawmakers to support a proposal to convert the gas tax to a percentage tax on the wholesale price of gas, which would rise at capped amounts as prices at the pump increase.
The gas tax could be as high as 34 cents a gallon in five to seven years under the plan that has been announced but not yet officially introduced. The tax would drop slightly this year, reach 24 cents in 2010 and rise no higher than 3 additional cents annually in subsequent years.
Steudle said people do not think twice about buying a $2 or $4 cup of coffee once a week or even every day.
"This will break everybody's back? Really? A half-pack of gum is going to break everybody's back? Let's put this in perspective," Steudle told the House and Senate Transportation committees.
Ache wrote:http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/06/03/ap6499063.htmlDrivers can afford to pay higher gasoline taxes to improve their roads, Michigan's top transportation official said while warning more than 125 projects will be delayed if funding is not increased.
State Department of Transportation Director Kirk Steudle on Tuesday...
City of Estacada voters will weigh in on a proposed 3-cent gas tax to pay for street repairs and improvements in a March 9 special election. If approved, the tax would generate an estimated $150,000 to $160,000 in revenue annually that would be used exclusively for upkeep of Estacada's streets.
Oregon lawmakers received a chilly reception on their idea to raise the tax on beer. But they may fare better in their quest to raise gasoline taxes to pay for better roads and fewer bottlenecks.
... snip ...
The last time the Legislature raised the gas tax, in May 2000, opponents gathered enough signatures to put the 2-cent tax hike on the ballot, where voters buried it. That was the fifth time Oregon voters blocked an increase in a tax first adopted in 1919.
GoghGoner wrote:Voters to decide 3-cent gas tax for streetsCity of Estacada voters will weigh in on a proposed 3-cent gas tax to pay for street repairs and improvements in a March 9 special election. If approved, the tax would generate an estimated $150,000 to $160,000 in revenue annually that would be used exclusively for upkeep of Estacada's streets.
I'll definitely be watching this vote. Anybody know of similar referendums? With asphalt prices so high and probably set to go higher to be competitive, this is a logical result, however, are voters logical?
In Estacada, voters defeated a city gas tax, which would have been used to repair local roads.
Panic is in the air as gasoline prices move above $4.00 per gallon. Politicians and pundits are rounding up the usual suspects, looking for someone or something to blame for this latest outrage to middle class family budgets. In a rare display of bipartisanship, President Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner are both wringing their hands over the prospect of seeing their newly extended Social Security tax cut gobbled up by rising gasoline costs.
Unfortunately, the talking heads that are trying to explain the reasons for high oil prices are missing one tiny detail. Oil prices aren’t high right now. In fact, they are unusually low. Gasoline prices would have to rise by another $0.65 to $0.75 per gallon from where they are now just to be “normal”. And, because gasoline prices are low right now, it is very likely that they are going to go up more—perhaps a lot more.
At Au0.0602/bbl, today’s WTI price is only 82% of its average over the past 41+ years. Assuming that gold prices remained at today’s $1,759.30/oz, WTI prices would have to rise by about 22%, to $128.86/bbl, in order to reach their long-term average in terms of gold. As mentioned earlier, such an increase would drive up retail gasoline prices by somewhere between $0.65 and $0.75 per gallon.
At this point, we can be certain that, unless gold prices come down, gasoline prices are going to go up—by a lot. And, because the dollar is currently a floating, undefined, fiat currency, there is no inherent limit to how far the price of gold in dollars can rise, and therefore no ultimate ceiling on gasoline prices.
Schadenfreude wrote:ForbesPanic is in the air as gasoline prices move above $4.00 per gallon. Politicians and pundits are rounding up the usual suspects, looking for someone or something to blame for this latest outrage to middle class family budgets. In a rare display of bipartisanship, President Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner are both wringing their hands over the prospect of seeing their newly extended Social Security tax cut gobbled up by rising gasoline costs.
Unfortunately, the talking heads that are trying to explain the reasons for high oil prices are missing one tiny detail. Oil prices aren’t high right now. In fact, they are unusually low. Gasoline prices would have to rise by another $0.65 to $0.75 per gallon from where they are now just to be “normal”. And, because gasoline prices are low right now, it is very likely that they are going to go up more—perhaps a lot more.At Au0.0602/bbl, today’s WTI price is only 82% of its average over the past 41+ years. Assuming that gold prices remained at today’s $1,759.30/oz, WTI prices would have to rise by about 22%, to $128.86/bbl, in order to reach their long-term average in terms of gold. As mentioned earlier, such an increase would drive up retail gasoline prices by somewhere between $0.65 and $0.75 per gallon.
At this point, we can be certain that, unless gold prices come down, gasoline prices are going to go up—by a lot. And, because the dollar is currently a floating, undefined, fiat currency, there is no inherent limit to how far the price of gold in dollars can rise, and therefore no ultimate ceiling on gasoline prices.
It's inevitable that the dollar will weaken; the world has been flooded with dollars ever since the wars began.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests