Ayoob wrote:My old lady picked up a portable room air conditioner tonight. To check it out and prepare for Earth Hour next year I plugged it in on the back porch and have it running right now. It's outside. It sucks in cold air, cools it off, and spits out even colder air into the night. As a bonus, the motor generates heat, warming Earth's atmosphere.
We'll see how it does over the next couple days.
I figure it goes well with my lava lamp collection.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:However it seems that one of the most trumpeted hopes of geoengineering (seeding oceans with iron) doesn't work. Excess of algal growth is quickly consumed by secondary bloom of other plankton organisms, which are feeding on it.JohnDenver wrote:If you want to actually deal with increased global temperatures, the best bet will be geoengineering. The effects of that will be dramatic, and the costs reasonable. In fact, that's the other dirty secret: geoengineering is rapidly becoming acceptable/mainstream among climatologists.
Firing sulfur aerosols to upper atmosphere is a nonsense as well (at best you would have to deliver few times more than Mt Pinatubo did and carry on exercise every 2 years or so).
Giant mirrors in space are not more than a joke due to technological difficulties. So I don't expect geoengineers to pose much risk to environment at the moment.
Repent wrote:It is frustrating to watch all this unfold knowing full well that these stopgap measures are way, way insufficient to solve global problems emerging on such a massive scale.
mos6507 wrote:It may be ineffective, but nothing else has proven to be effective (i.e. Live Earth and Copenhagen), so why bash people who at least are aware of the problem?
What do you want people to do, blow up a hydro dam like Derrick Jensen suggests?
Certainly railing against TPTB on a worldsend ain't helping matters.
Repent wrote:Sorry MOS6507, I didn't mean to bash people. I have very strong feelings that 'Greens' are currently doing more harm than good.
If you look at the corporate sponcership as just one example, they are playing into the 'fantasy land' idea of doing less harm to the enviroment. You see this every time you watch commercials on TV, buy Tide coldwater soap because you won't have to use hot water, buy ethanol gasoline because it pollutes less than gasoline (never you mind the food crisis situation this is setting up), buy this or that because it is packaged in recycled boxes, ect, ect.
It is frustrating to watch all this unfold knowing full well that these stopgap measures are way, way insufficient to solve global problems emerging on such a massive scale. I saw an article recently that said if the entire country of Canada could become carbon neutral, the additional C02 pollution from the growth in the economy of China in just the next 60 days would negate any gains from such an accomplishment.
Yes some people are trying to get the message out, but I feel it is the wrong message being sent. These people believe that business as usual can continue, so long as minor changes in behaviors and consuming activities are implemented. This is the wrong message. Its very frustrating to watch.
americandream wrote:Mate, these maggots in capitalism ain't gonna change. Not now, not ever. We need another Stalin and a purging Revolution to remove these pus balls.
eastbay wrote:americandream wrote:Mate, these maggots in capitalism ain't gonna change. Not now, not ever. We need another Stalin and a purging Revolution to remove these pus balls.
I just love it when you talk like that! It offers me hope.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests