Doly wrote:NeoPeasant wrote:Giving up the Simpsons was the among the toughest parts of eliminating television from my life a few years ago.
Not knowing much about the Simpsons is one of the greatest things of not having had television in my life, ever.
Loki wrote:Doly wrote:NeoPeasant wrote:Giving up the Simpsons was the among the toughest parts of eliminating television from my life a few years ago.
Not knowing much about the Simpsons is one of the greatest things of not having had television in my life, ever.
[hijack]
What is it with people who don't own a television that makes them so smug? Most everyone I know who doesn't own a TV has to smugly proclaim it at every opportunity, even though they know damn well that I'm aware they don't own a TV. Big deal, you don't have a TV, it's not like you're saving AIDS orphans in Africa. I didn't own a vacuum cleaner for years--does that make me morally superior, too?
[/hijack]
pstarr wrote:I am a recovering TV addict. I click the button and spin the dial like a dumb lab animal in front of a feeding machine. I am hopeless, ashamed, and I deserve your pity.
Is that smugness christian or liberal?
BrownDog wrote:When I rented, I'd tape the foil to a piece of cardboard and put that in the windows. The cardboard acts as an insulator, and allows the foil to easily be removed or reinstalled at will. It also allows you to use thinner foil and still have some durability.
pstarr wrote:Is that smugness christian or liberal?
elocs wrote:
Of course, as opposed to not watching tv is not reading books. We do have a president who does not read books and is proud of it. The last book he probably looked at was the one about a pet goat while he sat like a deer in the headlights in the grade school classroom after the planes crashed into the twin towers. [end of hijack commentary]
Actually, I heard recently that he read Camus' The Stranger
jbrown wrote:
- Code: Select all
Actually, I heard recently that he read Camus' The Stranger
PR stunt..... Looks like it's working
Loki wrote:I seriously doubt it. Who are they trying to appeal to? Liberals who absolutely loath the man and are already convinced that he's a moron? Conservatives who would be appalled that he's reading a novel by a pointy headed atheistic Frog? Moderates who've never heard of Camus and couldn't care less anyways? Sorry, but your explanation makes no sense. Not everything is a conspiracy.
jbrown wrote:Loki wrote:I seriously doubt it. Who are they trying to appeal to? Liberals who absolutely loath the man and are already convinced that he's a moron? Conservatives who would be appalled that he's reading a novel by a pointy headed atheistic Frog? Moderates who've never heard of Camus and couldn't care less anyways? Sorry, but your explanation makes no sense. Not everything is a conspiracy.
For the effect. It leaves people wondering. Look how you've rationalized it out. So it must be true.
Nice.oowolf wrote:I just wrapped my copy of "The Stranger" in aluminum foil.
NeoPeasant wrote:Loki wrote:Aluminum foil works pretty well in deflecting the mind-control transmissions MLB beams down from their satellites.
Why is Major League Baseball trying to control our minds?
NEOPO wrote:Just wanted to note that the dull side not the shiny is the most reflective
The official word from the Reynolds aluminum people is as follows: "It makes little difference which side of the Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil you use--both sides do the same fine job of cooking, freezing, and storing food. There is a slight difference in the reflectivity of the two sides, but it is so slight that laboratory instruments are required to measure it." -StraightDope.com
The shiny side is slightly better reflector of heat. Face that side of the foil in the appropriate direction. To keep things cold, put the shiny side on the outside -- that will reflect incoming heat. To keep things warm, face the shiny side inward toward the hot food -- to reflect the heat that is trying to escape back into the food.
Note that people often bake potatoes with the shiny side out -- that is because it makes for a better (prettier) presentation. In reality, baking them that way reflects the incoming heat on the outside, slightly slowing the cooking process.
Of course, in reality, which side of the foil faces where makes little difference. It does make for lively conversation, though.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests