Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Solar System Thread (merged)

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Bill Hicks » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 20:08:27

We're not going to Mars, and neither are the Chinese. It's called Peak Exploration and it is very much tied to Peak Oil:

http://billhicksisdead.blogspot.com/201 ... m-and.html
Check out The Downward Spiral (A Requiem for the American Dream):

http://billhicksisdead.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Bill Hicks
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2011, 22:22:16
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 20:15:08

Then again, maybe we already are there. :)

Of course our masters wouldn't tell us this. lsol
vision-master
 

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Narz » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 20:51:30

Wouldn't it be cheaper to try to colonize the sea floor or something?
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby mrflora » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 22:18:44

Zubrin has recently revealed a cut-down version of his Mars plan based on Spacex's recently-announced Falcon Heavy launcher. The Falcon Heavy is supposed to be able to orbit nearly 2x the Space Shuttle's payload at one-tenth the cost. I think the Zube's plan is mostly a thought experiment, although at under $1 billion there are a number of wealthy people who could sponsor it if they were so disposed.

Elon Musk has stated that he intends to retire on Mars, take it however you will.

Regards,
M.R.F.
"... coal and oil were depleted... increased demands for food cut off conversion of the agricultural surplus into fuel alcohol... solar power... as much a dream as atomic energy..." - Jack Williamson, "The Crucible of Power" (1939)
User avatar
mrflora
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 22:32:34

Can't even get Biodome to work, not likely to get Mars to work. Too far away to maintain a colony that is not self-sufficient.

We are likely to crash our civilization because of wrecking the current environment we live in; I doubt humans will be able to either gather enough understanding to recreate a survivable environment on Mars or enough self-control not to flush our current environment.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Wed 29 Jun 2011, 22:46:09

Isn't there some sort of 80/20 principle that should work for space exploration?

What we're already learning with advanced telescopes, and the plans for those in the pipeline currently are simply STUNNING -- and those telescopes do a LOT of work for a LONG time once they're built and launched.

It seems to me we should stick with that, learn all we can, and use the serious financial and resource requirements required for manned expeditions (much less colonies) on resolving many of our serious problems we currently have (and are escalating) on EARTH.

If we (for example) find little green intelligent men near star X, we can always re-evaluate. Even then, aside from a probe and a LOT of patience, I don't see us doing much of practical value by a bunch of (as John Cleese of Monty Python fabulously puts it) "knee bent running about" and expending horrendous resources until we actually make contact, even in that extreme case.

Almost all of the arguments I've seen recently for continuing a serious manned-expedition based NASA are based on testosterone induced visions of "leadership" and "spirit of exploration" rah-rah stuff. How about some common sense and learning self control first, as a species?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Graeme » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 00:36:41

mrflora, Here some more on Musk's plans!

Don't expect to hear any nostalgia about the soon-to-end space shuttle era from Elon Musk, the millionaire founder of Space Exploration Technologies. Musk isn't prone to look to the past, but rather to the future — to a "new era of spaceflight" that eventually leads to Mars.

SpaceX may be on the Red Planet sooner than you think: When I talked with him in advance of the shuttle Atlantis' last liftoff, the 40-year-old engineer-entrepreneur told me the company's Dragon capsule could take on a robotic mission to Mars as early as 2016. And he's already said it'd be theoretically possible to send humans to Mars in the next 10 to 20 years — bettering NASA's target timeframe of the mid-2030s.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can't always take Musk's timelines at face value. This is rocket science, after all, and Musk himself acknowledges that his company's projects don't always finish on time. But if he commits himself to a task, he tends to see it through. "It may take more time than I expected, but I'll always come through," he told me a year ago.

Since that interview, a lot of things have come through for SpaceX. The company has conducted successful tests of its Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon capsule. Before the end of the year, another test flight is expected to send a Dragon craft all the way to the space station for the first time. If that test is successful, SpaceX can start launching cargo to the International Space Station under the terms of a $1.6 billion NASA contract.

The company is also in line to receive $75 million more from NASA to start turning the Dragon into a crew-worthy space taxi for astronauts by 2015 or so. And just today, the company broke ground on a California launch pad that could be used by the next-generation Falcon Heavy rocket starting in 2013.

Once the Dragon and the Falcon Heavy are in service, the main pieces would be in place for a Mars mission, Musk said.


msnbc
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby peripato » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 00:56:39

GASMON wrote:China will be there within 10 years.

Just sit on your arses and watch.

Gas

“我相信,这个国家应该致力于实现这一目标,在此之前的十年,是降落在月球上的一名男子和他安全返回地球”
Image

:lol:
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby peripato » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 01:02:05

Narz wrote:Wouldn't it be cheaper to try to colonize the sea floor or something?

Perhaps the empty space between our collective brains would be a better place to start.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Sixstrings » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 02:01:27

ian807 wrote:There's nothing on Mars that necessitates our going there. Near earth orbit habitats for large-scale solar power and communications. That makes sense. Zero-G manufacturing.


Funny thing about colonizing space is that it's easier to colonize the ocean floor yet we haven't done that.. it's expensive, it's dangerous, the EROI ain't there..

We haven't even scratched the surface of exploring the oceans on this world.

(for that matter Alaska's pretty much empty we should colonize that)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Sixstrings » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 02:04:45

peripato wrote:“我相信,这个国家应该致力于实现这一目标,在此之前的十年,是降落在月球上的一名男子和他安全返回地球”


The Chinese have a ways to go yet. We may have given up, but the US is still apex on space tech. China's still behind us overall.. they just recently built a stealth bomber, who knows how good it is. Could be junk. They're workin' on drone tech, but we're way ahead there.

I read they just recently got spy satellites that are about as good as ours. But a manned moon mission? Mars mission? We could do it, they have a long way to go..
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Sys1 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 02:50:05

We don't really need to get to Mars.
We just have to put on TV news some Hollywood movie of 3 mans holding an Earth flag on the 3D remade red planet in order to make people think that if shelves are empty, bridges are collapsing and brownouts are slowly killing the internet, it has nothing to do with a collapsing civilisation since Hey! We are on Mars!
One year later, you could made another movie where you see a city on Mars.
Five years later, you could launch empty rockets every months while saying it's people going to Mars.

Fake hopes, just like when church used to promise paradise if you work hard for the landlord.
User avatar
Sys1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Cloud9 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 08:21:51

We either get of the planet or we are a doomed species.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby peripato » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 10:22:00

Cloud9 wrote:We either get of the planet or we are a doomed species.

Yeah, I mean that strategy sure seems to have worked out well for all those other space-faring species the infantile mind believes in. One of them, statistically, should have arrived here by now and turned us out to pasture, much like Europeans did to the Indians of N.A. and other aboriginal peoples of the world. (What? Why do you think they would travel all this way; just to exchange bodily fluids, perform rectal probes?) But where the f%#k are they? We scan the abyss and the abyss just yawns back...
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby AgentR11 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 11:06:39

I dunno, if I were god of the universe, (lol), and I wanted there to be multiple intelligent civilizations, but I didn't want them to mess with each other, I'd do two things.

Put no more than one in each galaxy.
Put a speed limit on the universe.

They'd never even so much as find out about each other, much less visit.

As a religious person, that leads me to expect:

There is no faster than light travel. Black holes are not tunnels, they are splat-machines. Warp drive only occurs in sci-fi novels.

We are free to wander about our solar system and the milkyway... slowly, IF we can manage to NOT fill our bassinet with poop and drown in it before we can walk.

That *IF* is proving to be difficult.
Maybe that is the divine test!
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6373
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby ian807 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 12:22:47

peripato wrote:
Cloud9 wrote:We either get of the planet or we are a doomed species.

Yeah, I mean that strategy sure seems to have worked out well for all those other space-faring species the infantile mind believes in. One of them, statistically, should have arrived here by now and turned us out to pasture, much like Europeans did to the Indians of N.A. and other aboriginal peoples of the world. (What? Why do you think they would travel all this way; just to exchange bodily fluids, perform rectal probes?) But where the f%#k are they? We scan the abyss and the abyss just yawns back...

I hate to be the one who addresses a spectacular lack of imagination, however....
Are you expecting off world intelligences to be organic creatures that arrive in metal ships and ask to be taken to our leaders?

As we've discovered, it's much easier to push bits around than stuff. By the time you get faster than light travel, you've almost certainly got artificial intelligence or remarkably enhanced intelligence via gene engineering and direct neural I/O to the alien equivalent of the internet, effectively giving you a massively parallel organic neural computer. At that point, you've probably solved most of the solvable problems your civilization has. And even if you haven't, why send organic bodies anywhere? You might send probes and sensors here and there to gather either recorded or real-time data, but physical, dangerous, energy-intensive travel? What for? Oh, and if the earth was surrounded by sand-grain sized probes (You'd want to make them as small as possible), would we even know?

Then there's that little difference in viewpoint. To us, space travel might mean going somewhere and seeing a new planet in our lifetime. To an alien, space travel might mean sending out spores, assuming a few thousandths of a percent will fall on viable planets a few million years in the future, and grow to their happy new life as intelligent fungi. Patience and the perception of time and "self" are going to vary a bit from species to species.

Then there's the little matter of recognizing intelligence when we see it. If intelligent gasbags exist on Jupiter, would we even know as our space probes flew right through them? Intelligent isn't the same as "complex-tool-using." Just ask your local dolphin, whose idea of a complex tool is a sponge.

For that matter, we may not be seeing intelligence that exists on Earth. If a large moss colony was in fact, capable of thinking about complex mathematics and philosophy, how would we know? Moss would only discuss these issues with other plants, chemically, and their favorite topic of discussion might be soil conditions, relatives and the weather. We might pull this out with a Zipf analysis of chemistry exchanges between plants, but as far as I know, nobody has looked.

In short, if you only look within the narrow boundaries of your own preconceptions, you will miss not only what's there, but what could be there.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby Cloud9 » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 14:24:47

Salvation from little green men what a bad idea. Remember how the microbe exchange worked out for the Indians. My point is simply this: Ours is a violent planet and an even more violent solar system. On day an asteroid the size of Texas will impact this planet. We are either somewhere else or the species ceases to exist.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby peripato » Thu 14 Jul 2011, 22:07:35

ian807 wrote:I hate to be the one who addresses a spectacular lack of imagination, however.... Are you expecting off world intelligences to be organic creatures that arrive in metal ships and ask to be taken to our leaders?

Yes, creatures driven by primal biological urges. In other words, stupid life like us. However we haven't been colonised, despite the high statistical likelihood that at least one high-tech extraterrestrial species should have evolved at some stage before us and left its home planet, or so the theory goes. Expanding even at a snail's pace (i.e. 1% of the speed of light), they could have spread throughout the galaxy by now, given the age of the place.

That they haven't arrived supports the view that other high-tech civilisations either did not exist, or if they did, did not do so for very long (which appears to be our likely fate), or if they do currently exist find that it is impossible to transcend the stupendously vast distances involved. Space is God's quarantine area as they say. Of course, Alien/UFO believers, like all other person's of faith, will bleat until dead that they could still arrive any day now, despite all evidence to the contrary.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 18:28:28

Cloud9 wrote:Salvation from little green men what a bad idea. Remember how the microbe exchange worked out for the Indians. My point is simply this: Ours is a violent planet and an even more violent solar system. On day an asteroid the size of Texas will impact this planet. We are either somewhere else or the species ceases to exist.

One day the universe will collapse on itself or expand until entrophy rules all... then the species ceases to exist anyway.

The odds of little green men saving us are more likely than solving either of the two above possibilities.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: The Case For Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet

Unread postby AgentR11 » Tue 16 Aug 2011, 19:00:28

Space X is a private corporation that sells lift services.
Space X will soon demonstrate the Falcon Heavy.
The Falcon Heavy is capable of lifting the loads needed for a go-and-stay Mars mission.

You wanna go?
Write the check.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6373
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Environment, Weather & Climate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 255 guests