some_math_guy wrote:In 2000 in California for example, a temporary 5% natural gas shortfall caused a 400% increase in price. A 20% disruption in refined fuel capacity following Hurricane Katrina caused the price of fuel to increase by more than 50%, etc.
Heating your home is essential, wearing shiny stuff no.
You also argue that jewelry and photography are not necessary, but I would argue that the hundreds of millions of women who wear jewelry and use film will still want the benefit of those goods.
It is unimportant.
Hundreds of millions of women want a lot of gold, diamonds etc but they are only getting quite restricted quantities of these.
At the end they will prefer daily meal than something shiny to wear, albeit there might be few silly exceptions.
Kodac only raised global analog film prices by 5%, and made a big deal about having to do it. And I think that the 5 billion or so people who have never even seen a digital camera or computer will still be wanting to get their picture taken sometime in their lives, so standard film will be in demand for a long, long time to come.
Man, Kodak is already withholding their analogue products from the market and within a year or two they will *close* network of laboratories processing analogue films.
That is already over...