Schmuto wrote:Fishman wrote:"Should we "nuke" pakistan? Is that question really asked? Is somebody monstrous enough to ask, "should we murder 180 million people?"
Come on guys, Schmu is right. Of course if those potentially taliban controlled nukes hit India one could expect 500 million to be killed, now that number would certainly be a reason for India to nuke them. You terrible zionist pigs (as apposed to those nice taliban guys )
Ah yes, the 2nd local Zionist has checked in. Where is Kam? Can we make it H'threesome?
I can't speak for Fishman or Kam, but anyone who thinks I'm a Zionist really doesn't know me, LOL. I think that creating Israel was a mistake, and I know all about stuff like the King David Hotel bombing by the Irgun in 1946, and the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. I'm not a big fan of Israel.
Being a NON-monotheist, I'm not a big fan of Christianity or Islam either, especially the radical variants, and event if I was, there is always Allyn's Rule #6: "Better someone else dies than me and my own".
In the event of a Taliban takeover, I was more or less advocating pin-point strikes on Pakistan's nuke sites, which would kill less people than the 50-100 million that an exchange between Pakistan and India would. I would advocate a saturation strike if that was the only way to stop them from getting a nuke over here.
Given the lack of success at supressing Somalia pirates as an example, I wonder what the odds are that a nuke could be smuggled out of Pakistan into the US?
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right
Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take
You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown
Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy