by gg3 » Sat 11 Dec 2004, 09:39:28
This is a very intresting topic, and similar to my item about extraction of resources over the time-domain, vs the space-domain, vs the information-domain.
In essence it comes down to two questions: How does society factor the input of future generations into present decisions; and a more specific question, how can the the present economy obtain price signals from the future economy?
I have a wild intuitive idea here, which is somewhat utopian and therefore offered more as a thought-experiment. It is hardly intended as a complete solution, only as a feedback mechanism that could be put into place.
The nearest direct information we have about the interests of future generations comes from our own children, at the age where they are verbally capable but have not yet become enculturated to the point where their will has been bent. And, there is a natural and special affinity between young children and their grandparents; or to generalize, between young children and elders.
Envision the potential for a council or similar entity that is composed of children between ages 5 (yes, five) and 18, and grandparents in the ages of 70 and up. The task of the elders is to elucidate the intentions of the younger children, who will become adults in a couple of decades, and will become elders themselves in six or more decades. The task of the council is to promulgate reports and recommendations, perhaps even including proposed legislation, that will address the issues of future generations.
It's not clear how this would be fitted into our systems of constitutional government. However, it could serve a role similar to that of councils of elders in tribal societies and various secular and sacred institutions in industrial societies.
The council's discussions and reports would be broadcast over dedicated channels (on cable and satellite television and radio services) and made available over dedicated internet sites. At first they might hardly be noticed, but quickly enough, they would be heard and read by enough people as to start making a difference in public opinion.
An obvious problem remains to be solved, of how to go about choosing the members of this council. Perhaps they could be drawn by lottery from a pool of volunteers, thereby minimizing the risks of self-promotion beyond the level of submitting one's name.
Another obvious problem is the legalities of parents submitting their own children to this process. However, if council business were conducted primarily via teleconference, those children would never need to leave their own homes, until they were of the age to participate from school.
As teenagers they (those who are presently serving) could perhaps volunteer and be chosen by lottery, to spend a summer engaged in council business at some central meeting point. To assure that kids could participate regardless of economic means, they would be provided with proper accommodations at no cost, and paid an amount equivalent to what an average kid of their age earns working over the summer months.
Replacement of members would occur on a rolling basis: perhaps each person serving a maximum of five years, with new members added as existing ones reach the end of their terms, the age of adulthood, or leave due to age-related illness, disability, or death.
It would be really interesting to try this and see what happens. For now, at least to run the scenario and consider the potential outcomes with an open mind.