shortonoil wrote:How do the presidential candidates propose to increase US production and reduce foreign oil dependency by drilling in deep water off the continental coast. It would require 100’s of ships (at several $100 million a shot) to have any kind of significant impact.
Sounds like more political malarkey to me!
I'm in El Paso right now and can't look the apropriate references up, But J. Ben Carsey wrote an article for the AAPG Bulletin about deep structures in the Gulf of Mexico and Michael Halibouty published a map of the deep water salt domes in the pocket maps of his 2nd edition of Saltdomes of the Gulf Coast and Mexico. If someone could locate and post these we might have a little idea of the number of deepwater structures out there. Most, if not all, of the oil and gas fields in the Gulf are associated with salt domes.
I, personally, feel that there is a lot of oil and gas out there, plus in deeper depths of the salt domes in shallower water. But, it will only slow our decline in oil in the US. Natural gas is a different matter. The Gulf is gas-prone,as are wells more than 10,000 ft subsurface anywhere. But the deepwater stuff will have to be completed and operated by robotics and that isn't going to be cheap or easy.
Moreover, Thunder Horse also defies "fossil-fuel" oil theorists who like to argue that oil comes from dead dinosaurs and decaying ancient forests. With the water depth of nearly 2 miles, Thunder Horse is truly an ultra-deep project. From the floor of the Gulf, BP has drilled down another 6 miles to hit oil. What evidence is there that any ancient dinosaur ever walked on land that is now 8 miles down?
Interesting comment from the sadly recently deceased oilmanbob
Good god, you'll love this bit of abiotic fume-sniffing short:
Who build these rigs? Korean shipyards?
Also in Korea, Hyundai is building a drillship for Global Sante Fe using Rolls-Royce thrusters for propulsion and dynamic positioning. This will be an upgraded version of the existing C R Luigs and Jack Ryan vessels.
Sshhhh! Don't let the sheeple hear you, they get all confused with that kind of talk! They might start thinking oil won't be $50/bbl next year...How do the presidential candidates propose to increase US production and reduce foreign oil dependency by drilling in deep water off the continental coast. It would require 100’s of ships (at several $100 million a shot) to have any kind of significant impact.
Opening new areas in the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and elsewhere to exploration and production, as President Bush proposed Wednesday, would exacerbate those challenges, analysts say.
"Unless we have some sort of severe recession and demand drops considerably, equipment vendors, service vendors and engineers and construction laborers are likely to remain in very short supply," said Candida Scott, a senior director of cost and technology at Cambridge Energy Research Associates, the Massachusetts-based consultancy.
However, Ms. Scott and others say, even if the long-standing ban were lifted immediately, it could be a couple of years and maybe longer before any marked activity would take place.
way to secure adequate engineering resources, the organization has said.
The supply of drilling rigs is extremely tight. ODS-Petrodata, which tracks the rig market, says every semisubmersible rig and drillship available in North America is in use.
In some cases, oil companies would have to prioritize projects. If an outfit were able to gain access to a field that looked to have long-term potential, it might shift resources from an older, maturing field, said Scott Mitchell, an analyst with research and consulting firm Wood Mackenzie.
shortonoil wrote:There is also another thread here on all the oil Brazil is finding in deep water. Where are the drill-ships going to come from to develop all this oil, if it really is there. At $800 million a shot, I hope that the Brazilian treasury is in really good shape.
Petroleo Brasileiro, owner of the Western Hemisphere's largest oil discovery in three decades, plans to order 40 drilling ships and platforms worth about $30 billion for delivery by 2017.
State-run oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras, will spend $5 billion to build 146 ships and plans to hire 40 deep-water drilling rigs and platforms, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told shipbuilders in Niteroi, a harbor town near Rio de Janeiro's coast. Analysts said the additional equipment could cost an extra $15 billion.
Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, leased about 80 percent of the world's deepest-drilling offshore rigs to explore prospects including the Western Hemisphere's biggest discovery in decades.
Petrobras, as the Rio de Janeiro-based company is known, is hiring rigs that can drill in at least 3,000 meters (9,800 feet) of water, Chief Executive Officer Jose Sergio Gabrielli said in an interview last week. The world has 21 such vessels, according to Rigzone.com, which tracks the offshore drilling industry.
shortonoil wrote:Deep water is now the most likely source of new replacement oil. If each new well produced 3000b/d it would take 850 new wells per year. At 4 successfully completed wells per year/ship it would 213 deep water drill-ships to do it.
OilFinder2 wrote:Money doesn't seem to be their problem.
We are exposed to increases in prevailing market interest rates, which leaves us vulnerable to increased financing expenses.
In spite of marked improvements in our credit ratings, which have facilitated our access to fixed-interest long-term capital, a substantial portion of our total debt is represented by structured finance, export credits, trade financing and other similar financing methods the funding of which depends on floating rate instruments, and which for contractual, cost or other considerations cannot be prepaid. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 66%— U.S.$14,452 million of our total indebtedness—consisted of floating rate debt. In light of cost considerations and market analysis, we decided not to enter into derivative contracts or make other arrangements to hedge against the risk of an increase in interest rates. Accordingly, if market interest rates (principally LIBOR) rise, our financing expenses will increase, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
DantesPeak wrote:OilFinder2 wrote:Money doesn't seem to be their problem.
That's a strange comment. A contract has to be paid for.
Despite increasing it's earnings, Petrobras had to use $6 billion of its own cash to get through 2007, plus borrowed $2 billion. It will be interesting to see just how a quasi-public company plans on borrowing hundreds of billion of $s before it earns much in the way of revenues from deep water drilling.
OilFinder2 wrote:DantesPeak wrote:OilFinder2 wrote:Money doesn't seem to be their problem.
That's a strange comment. A contract has to be paid for.
Despite increasing it's earnings, Petrobras had to use $6 billion of its own cash to get through 2007, plus borrowed $2 billion. It will be interesting to see just how a quasi-public company plans on borrowing hundreds of billion of $s before it earns much in the way of revenues from deep water drilling.
Obviously the banks (or whoever) who will lend Petrobras the money for these things consider it to be a good investment.
OilFinder2 wrote:Obviously the banks (or whoever) who will lend Petrobras the money for these things consider it to be a good investment.
If I were a bank, I'd sure lend them the money.
shortonoil wrote:If I were a bank, I'd sure lend them the money.
Do you work for Citigroup, Country Wide, or Bear Stearns by any chance?
OilFinder2 wrote:shortonoil wrote:If I were a bank, I'd sure lend them the money.
Do you work for Citigroup, Country Wide, or Bear Stearns by any chance?
Nope. I do GIS for an Indian tribe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 234 guests