Litroenergy wrote:How about a glowing light source that lasts for 15 years instead of the typical 15 minutes of a glowstick? GlowPaint’s newest product does just that and is also non-toxic and inexpensive and doesn’t require a recharge via solar or electrical sources for its entire lifespan. According to the company, “This has potential to save billions in energy costs world-wide. Litroenergy™ surpasses all known available lighting options for cost/durability/reliability and safety.” Their products are expected to be used to replace other forms of safety, emergency and novelty lighting duties normally performed by glow sticks, LEDs and other light sources.
Litroenergy was also submitted to the Nasa Create the Future Design Contest to compete based on its originality and potentially major impact on sustainable energy technology. More information can be found via GlowPaint’s online patent application though much of their research remains proprietary.
Slowpoke wrote:Isn't tritium the stuff they make them newfangled weapon sights out of?
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Slowpoke wrote:Isn't tritium the stuff they make them newfangled weapon sights out of?
Professor Membrane wrote: Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
heroineworshipper wrote:The shipping cost is negligable and as long as it's made in China, the environmental damage to melt the glass, refine the metal, mine the raw materials, is their problem.
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests