pstarr wrote:Newfie, I don't mean to be too dismissive but isn't Futrex a modified monorail? Has that transportation alternative ever really succeeded? Except at the Disney parking lot? (I have to admit that when I went to the site link, my horrible sarcastic brain stem read "System 21 ® Moonbeam Technology" lol)
Yes, exactly, a modified monorail. The problem with monorail systems, and people movers in general, is that they have difficulty in switching between tracks, thus it is hard to build a rail network. It's actually comparatively easy with a rail system, just 2 rails, the track work is a mature technology.
You should see some of the contraptions they come up with for switching!
If you are doing a simple shuttle operation like you see in many airports then these automated people movers (not monorails) work pretty well. The fleet is captive to the guideway and the shop facilities are built in, often hidden under the platform on one end.
As soon as you have to have tracks diverge, 2 or more routes, things get complicated.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not in love with Futrex, it's just that it was a much saner design than Hyper loop. By comparison it built on existing technology to try to solve known problems and advantage real working people.
In the past few years I've have been exposed to a couple of interesting technologies including wire pulled systems by Dopplemeyer, an antiquated MATRA system, and I am working with Bombardier on a system replacement. I've been learning a lot. These driverless systems are VERY complex and the safety requirements present a very high bar.
Here is a tid bit for you, did you know the Washington, DC METRO was designed to be driverless? In fact they have operated it that way, with the driver only making PA announcements. I don't think they are doing that now, but could be wrong. Their operation record is far from perfect with several fatal accidents. It's all in the public record.