vtsnowedin wrote:From the article you linked:The fact that, much later on, many elements of the laptops history and provenance were confirmed as legitimate (with some open questions) is important, but does not change the simple fact that the morning the NY Post story came out, it was extremely unclear (in either direction) except to extreme partisans in both camps.
So it is legitimate evidence and I expect we will find it very interesting.
According to the NY Post article apparently. Interesting that you didn't quote the "many elements"? Plant hasn't either, perhaps because "many elements" are those nudie and porn pix Plant seems to interested in? I'm waiting for the usual, the indictment, copies of the emails and bank transactions, the quid pro quo in someone's own writing. Legitimate is nice, but who cares about those porn pix and whatnot Plant is fixated on. I want to know how much $$ changed hands, and how.
I will find it interesting as well.
vtsnowedin wrote: But feel free to go with the fifty one experts that tried to discredit it without having access to the contents.
That is SOP regardless of who is in charge of the coverup. It isn't as though Joe is so stupid as to stand up in front of an armed crowd and order them to arms to overthrow the government. Republicrats have been quite public in supporting unAmerican activites. I find it comforting that we have a normal politician in charge, capable of keeping their possible dirty deeds out of sight, rather than the other parties "let us just be traitors together" model.