Livewire713 wrote:Yes Cog...tell us what happens! Im all ears! Maybe deMolay will answer if you can't.
Ummm... The rich have to endure having one less bugatti and the poor get to eat?
![Razz :P](https://peakoil.com/forums/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Livewire713 wrote:Yes Cog...tell us what happens! Im all ears! Maybe deMolay will answer if you can't.
diemos wrote:Livewire713 wrote:Yes Cog...tell us what happens! Im all ears! Maybe deMolay will answer if you can't.
Ummm... The rich have to endure having one less bugatti and the poor get to eat?
Lore wrote:
Limiting companies to a 1,000 or fewer employees would be neither productive or practical
Cog wrote:But since I have a lot of closet Marxists who want my opinion, I will venture forth.
These poor aren't going to work until they don't have a choice. Only then will they work. And they will do the least amount of work possible at the lowest acceptable level of performance. Why is that? Is it cultural? Do they not have ambition genes Who cares? It is what it is, and neither you or me is going to change it by showing them how good it is to strive for sustainability and low debt. You want to whine about the rich and cry about your situation. Then improve your situation and adapt. If you think its bad now just wait until the down-slope of peak oil. You will have a great deal to whine about then. You call yourself preppers and survivalists? You don't have a frigging clue.
If you are still whining about rich people over the last 40 years and didn't do anything to improve your situation, which coincides with the peak of the oil age and all the easy-to-get riches that entailed, you didn't want it. Simple as that.
Stop kidding yourself.
Your average poor person doesn't want to make something better of themselves.They don't want to get a college degree.They don't want to work 40 hours a week. They don't want a house with a picket fence. What they do want is to continue to suck the government teat as their parents did and as they hope their children will. If you want to pay for sloth do it and you have my blessing. But don't invite me down into your socialist hell thinking the rich somehow created poor people by their mere existence.
Livewire713 wrote:
Not total BS, maybe 75% BS.
Ludi wrote:
"Children from low-income families have only a 1 percent chance of reaching the top 5 percent of the income distribution, versus children of the rich who have about a 22 percent chance...
Cog wrote:But since I have a lot of closet Marxists who want my opinion, I will venture forth.
These poor aren't going to work until they don't have a choice. Only then will they work. And they will do the least amount of work possible at the lowest acceptable level of performance. Why is that? Is it cultural? Do they not have ambition genes Who cares? It is what it is, and neither you or me is going to change it by showing them how good it is to strive for sustainability and low debt. You want to whine about the rich and cry about your situation. Then improve your situation and adapt. If you think its bad now just wait until the down-slope of peak oil. You will have a great deal to whine about then. You call yourself preppers and survivalists? You don't have a frigging clue.
If you are still whining about rich people over the last 40 years and didn't do anything to improve your situation, which coincides with the peak of the oil age and all the easy-to-get riches that entailed, you didn't want it. Simple as that.
Stop kidding yourself.
Your average poor person doesn't want to make something better of themselves.They don't want to get a college degree.They don't want to work 40 hours a week. They don't want a house with a picket fence. What they do want is to continue to suck the government teat as their parents did and as they hope their children will. If you want to pay for sloth do it and you have my blessing. But don't invite me down into your socialist hell thinking the rich somehow created poor people by their mere existence.
vision-master wrote:Cog wrote:
Ambition genes? Don't you mean money making genes? Ru Jewish?
Ain't the internet grand - you have no power over me.
Cog wrote:But since I have a lot of closet Marxists who want my opinion, I will venture forth.
These poor aren't going to work until they don't have a choice. Only then will they work. And they will do the least amount of work possible at the lowest acceptable level of performance. Why is that? Is it cultural? Do they not have ambition genes Who cares? It is what it is, and neither you or me is going to change it by showing them how good it is to strive for sustainability and low debt. You want to whine about the rich and cry about your situation. Then improve your situation and adapt. If you think its bad now just wait until the down-slope of peak oil. You will have a great deal to whine about then. You call yourself preppers and survivalists? You don't have a frigging clue.
If you are still whining about rich people over the last 40 years and didn't do anything to improve your situation, which coincides with the peak of the oil age and all the easy-to-get riches that entailed, you didn't want it. Simple as that.
Stop kidding yourself.
Your average poor person doesn't want to make something better of themselves.They don't want to get a college degree.They don't want to work 40 hours a week. They don't want a house with a picket fence. What they do want is to continue to suck the government teat as their parents did and as they hope their children will. If you want to pay for sloth do it and you have my blessing. But don't invite me down into your socialist hell thinking the rich somehow created poor people by their mere existence.
Oneaboveall wrote:When conservatives talk, does it make sense to them?
KingM wrote:It's important to understand the orders of magnitude in wealth between the poorest and the richest.
Think of it this way. One hundred thousand Mexican laborers working forty hours a week hanging drywall worked two hundred million man hours at ten bucks an hour and made less in 2009 than James Simmons, head of the hedge fund Renaissance Technologies, who received 2.5 billion (2,500,000,000.00) in compensation last year.
What did he do? He extracted money in small percentages from lots of other people so they could invest their savings. For that, he was paid more than 100,000,000 laborers.
Cog wrote:Oneaboveall wrote:When conservatives talk, does it make sense to them?
I don't know. Do you talk to yourself much?
I'm not sure whether to cry or laugh. Its like no one on this board ever heard about the ramifications of peak oil. Do you really think it matters who has money and who doesn't anymore? Nature won't care and neither should you. Best get building that lifeboat and stop whining about trivial matters.
vision-master wrote:I'm not sure whether to cry or laugh. Its like no one on this board ever heard about the ramifications of peak oil. Do you really think it matters who has money and who doesn't anymore? Nature won't care and neither should you. Best get building that lifeboat and stop whining about trivial matters.
Now you sound like LATOC... make up your mind!
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests