Cid_Yama wrote:There is no burger king to switch to. Discovery peaked in the 1960's. There are no supergiants available to replace the ones that are exhausted.
Says who? Do you happen to have all the seismic lines across Africa at your disposal because darn it, I don't. And your plan for developing all the worlds heavy oil, have you published it anywhere, or can we all just assume that we'll use it as well, sooner or later? How about those incremental recovery factors, maybe we can just change those a little, come up with another trillion barrels, and make this a conversation for your grandchildren?
Better yet, why not work through all THREE!
Cid_Yama wrote:Oil is a finite resource and we've used up most of it.
Certainly actual experts in the field don't agree.
With 14 trillion in the ground, we haven't even used up a large minority of it yet, let alone "most of it". Of course, I am forced to rely on recognized experts for this information versus bloggers with no more oil experience than it takes to fill up their cars.
http://www.spe.org/spe-app/spe/jpt/2006 ... illion.htmCid_Yama wrote:You are no different than climate change deniers who won't believe global warming is real until they personally suffer on account of it.
Deny it? Ruddiman wrote a perfectly reasonable book, and related peer reviewed science papers, showing how humans have been doing it for 8,000- 5,000 years now. You want to get irritated NOW over something we've been doing since before recorded history began? What for? People might as well deny that they breathe....
Cid_Yama wrote:Adaptation to an oil free world will be a lot easier while there is still oil. If you wait until it's gone, you have collapse instead of mitigation.
Peak oil isn't about it being GONE, its about having a few trillion more barrels with which to do with whatever we wish.