Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Drill in ANWR?

Poll ended at Mon 13 Sep 2004, 18:58:32

Yes, we now have the technology to do it cleanly
4
14%
Yes, we need the oil, and nobody goes there anyway
3
10%
Yes, it will rape the land but we need the oil
4
14%
No, if ANWR opens up, all the national parks are at risk
1
3%
No, this is one of the last great wildernesses
9
31%
No, bring on peak oil
8
28%
 
Total votes : 29

Re: The ANWR 2,000 acre lie:

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 22 Nov 2009, 09:35:54

Aren't we going to have to sell the whole kit and kaboodle (Alaska) to the Chinese anyway ? Better to hype up how much oil there is and how easy it will be to get now, pre-sale.

Either way, somebody is going to tap that oil since oil is so valuable. The questions relevent to public policy are who, when, what it is used for.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

Unread postby Hawkcreek » Thu 26 Nov 2009, 14:35:53

Monte does not mention that the Alaskan pipeline can move up to 2 MBPD & that it's half full now. Given the lack of shipping available, that means actual delivery of Alaskan crude can grow no greater than 1 MBPD.
Yawn


Actually, the pipeline can no longer move 2 MBPD. The new reconfiguration of the line limits flow to 1.15 MBPD. Existing flow now is about 700 KBPD.
With modifications (probably about 500 million dollars worth), flow could be upped to about 1.4 million a day. But I will bet that would never be needed, because as the oil flow depletes from Prudhoe, any flow from ANWR would just make up the difference. In order for ANWR to ever produce more than 1MPBD, the interconnect pipeline to the main line would have to be around 48 inches, with a couple of pump stations. That by itself would be a massive project.
I doubt that ANWR will ever be drilled, and I also doubt that a gas pipeline will ever be built from the slope.
If construction started tomorrow (which it won't because everyone will be nursing hangovers in Alaska tomorrow), it would still take 7-10 years before anyone ever saw the first oil or gas. I just don't see any company - or group of companies - being able to come up with the 100 billion dollars it would probably take to do those jobs.
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Re: The ANWR 2,000 acre lie:

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Thu 26 Nov 2009, 19:01:40

Plantagenet wrote:
Tanada wrote:The real question that should be asked is, what impact has the development of Prudhoe Bay fields had on the wildlife? Secondly is that level of impact acceptable for ANWR development?
If the answer is minimal and acceptable then drill, if the answers are otherwise then don't drill.
The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou.
My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

Unread postby Hawkcreek » Sat 28 Nov 2009, 17:28:09

My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.

Possible, but the only serious predators for the caribou in the past 30 years were the "barren ground grizzlies". There never were too many of them in the past, and there aren't many now. Since they don't migrate with the caribou, food is extremely limited whenever the caribou haven't reached the coastal plains, and that is probably why there aren't too many of them, not that they have been run off.
But a possible reason for the increase in caribou might be the warmer weather on the slope in the last 20 years.
It has devastated the Arctic fox population, because it is warm enough for the larger Red Fox to move north into their territory, and the reds are killing off the whites.
Some people might claim that is the fault of the oil companies too, since they think burning the oil is causing global warming.
Me, I don't know.
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby larry00 » Mon 28 Dec 2009, 14:23:14

Once the trans Alaska pipeline is shut down it will be washed and disassembled and gone . Billions in 1960's dollars gone finis !

That will ensure ANWR which all ten people who have been there say is a Mosquito infested desolate place can keep it's billions of bbl's of crude and trillions of units of gas cause the expense of getting it to market would be too costly without tying in to the Trans Alaska pipeline !

We are really stupid people and no doubt deserve our fate ! What else is new ! :oops:

Dwindling Oil Production Threatens To Blow The Trans-Alaska Pipeline by Joe Weisenthal, Dec. 27, 2009:
The 800-mile long trans-Alaska pipeline -- a key artery in our national oil infrastructure -- is on the verge of collapse owing to the decreased production out of Alaska's North Slope.
As with other key components of oil infrastructure, the pipeline does not do well then the flow slows to a trickle. Underutilization is a major problem.
The Seattle-Tacoma News Tribune (via The Oil Drum) has an interesting report on the situation there. …

Green Sheet
Last edited by Ferretlover on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 12:01:46, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Cleaned up formatting per COC 3.1.5 Copyrighted material: If you wish to reference an article, provide a short, quoted excerpt with a link back to the original source.
User avatar
larry00
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri 17 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Mon 28 Dec 2009, 15:04:10

The opportunity is not all that huge.

Note - The pipeline was built with 1970's dollars.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 28 Dec 2009, 15:33:00

Larry-

How many barrels are under there? How cheap can you drill that oil for? How long until you can get it flowing?

I have the feeling that it would have been drilled long ago if it was economically feasible and existed in great enough amounts. I have nothing against drilling up there... drill away!
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 29 Dec 2009, 08:28:15

larry00 wrote:That will ensure ANWR which all ten people who have been there say is a Mosquito infested desolate place

Wow, neat! Ten people have been there! Go mosquitoes!
Ludi
 

Re: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Tue 29 Dec 2009, 09:27:47

frankthetank wrote:Larry-I have the feeling that it would have been drilled long ago if it was economically feasible and existed in great enough amounts. I have nothing against drilling up there... drill away!
I thinl that is also true about all the phantom offshore areas. If there was much oil in those places it would have been developed years ago.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby Schadenfreude11 » Sat 16 Jan 2010, 13:26:05

I thinl that is also true about all the phantom offshore areas. If there was much oil in those places it would have been developed years ago.

There is lots of Arctic oil, not at all cheap or easy to get at though. I think the political will is lacking as well, that should be overcome the next time oil gets matierally above $100 and the futility economy continues it's plunge into the 7th circle of hell.
Schadenfreude11
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 16 Jan 2010, 00:23:15

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 16 Jan 2010, 13:57:47

Has anyone considered saving it for later? Or are we all on the same page wanting to burn it all up as fast as we can?
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby Schadenfreude11 » Sat 16 Jan 2010, 19:48:39

eastbay wrote:Has anyone considered saving it for later? Or are we all on the same page wanting to burn it all up as fast as we can?


Duly noted.

Unfortunately, the concept of 'later on' in a fast-food society built upon a infintile obsession with instant gratification is rather depressing.

I would be satified if we just even made an effort to use oil more intelligently.
Schadenfreude11
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 16 Jan 2010, 00:23:15

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby shortonsense » Sat 16 Jan 2010, 19:53:45

Schadenfreude11 wrote:I would be satified if we just even made an effort to use oil more intelligently.


+1
[smilie=icon_thumright.gif]
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby hironegro » Sat 23 Jan 2010, 23:19:53

or maybe should use energy more efficiently
hironegro
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue 08 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The ANWR 2,000 acre lie:

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 19 Feb 2010, 04:55:59

hillsidedigger wrote:
Plantagenet wrote:
Tanada wrote:The real question that should be asked is, what impact has the development of Prudhoe Bay fields had on the wildlife? Secondly is that level of impact acceptable for ANWR development?
If the answer is minimal and acceptable then drill, if the answers are otherwise then don't drill.
The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou.
My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.


Connecting Prudhoe Bay oil development to the growht of the caribou herd is preposterous. Caribou herds traditionally show dramatic increases and decreases for reasons not readily apparent to the biologists.

Here is a snip from an article on the state of caribou and reindeer herds worldwide:

Reindeer herds in global decline

"Vors and Mark Boyce at the University of Alberta contacted other researchers and scoured the published literature and government databases for all the information they could find about reindeer and caribou numbers. They compiled data on 58 major herds around the Northern Hemisphere.

The scientists were shocked to discover that 34 of the herds were declining, while no data existed for 16 more. Only eight herds were increasing in number. Many herds had been declining for a decade or more."

Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_ne ... 094036.stm
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

Unread postby hillsidedigger » Fri 19 Feb 2010, 08:15:17

"The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou."

That sounds like a statement of Sarah Palin.
User avatar
hillsidedigger
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun 31 May 2009, 22:31:27
Location: Way up North in the Land of Cotton.

Re: THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

Unread postby Hawkcreek » Mon 22 Feb 2010, 02:54:18

hillsidedigger wrote:"The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou."

That sounds like a statement of Sarah Palin.

Actually, it has been pretty obvious to anyone who has seen the herds up close that they increased in number since the early years of the development of the field. That is not a political statement. It is an eyewitness report.
I do seem to have noticed a decrease in numbers in the past couple of years, but for the first 20 years, at least, the numbers were increasing.
Maybe we reached Peak Caribou?
What is says to me is that the field development and the pipeline did not disrupt the herds. In fact, I have seen caribou standing in the shade of the pipeline to avoid mosquitos. To them, it is a natural feature of their environment.
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Re: THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

Unread postby Homesteader » Mon 22 Feb 2010, 05:29:57

I would agree that it appears that Prudhoe Bay development did not adversely affect the herd.

To claim it had a beneficial impact is just plain silly.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby larry00 » Wed 04 May 2011, 23:40:29

I'm assuming everyone is now aware Shell is for the umpteenth time is trying for permitting to drill in the Barents bay area in Alaska which would extend the Alaskan Pipeline for a while longer !
The Prudhoe North Slope is dwindling down at 7 percent per year .

The EPA turned down Shell's last try because they did not include a study of CO2 generated by a Ice Breaker needed in the winter time to keep supply flowing to rigs.
The nearest native village is 70 miles away but they natives al have a copy of Al Gores Movie " An Inconvenient Truth " , well the inconvenient part fits !
Like it or lump it there is no alternative to take the place of fossil fuels for at least thirty years !

Obama EPA just what is your plan to sustain our economy till that elusive replacement comes along ?
Would it be Grid busting electric cars using power generated by guess what ! Fossil fuels ?

I really feel bad about launching that Desert Dune Lizard into the stratosphere aboard my home made rocket when I lived in New Mexico in the 60's ! I was unable to catch a Kangaroo Rat !
Now I feel responcible for the possibility of shutting down drilling in the entire Permian Basin ! Jeez what a low life !
Thanks Obama ! I hope we remember those good old days of $ 3.00 gas come 2012 !
User avatar
larry00
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri 17 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: The Trans-Alaska Pipeline: Huge Missed Opportunity !

Unread postby Pops » Thu 05 May 2011, 11:31:07

Larry you need to get out more to get this stuff off yer chest! Let the world know, Brother!

Don't get so worked up, we'll drill up there eventually, we'll drill everywhere and burn everything until the entire planet looks like an ad for Round-Up.

But let me clue you in, prices will never come down to levels like the good old days where you got your windshield washed, tires and oil checked and a free Melmac plate with every fill up.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests