Monte does not mention that the Alaskan pipeline can move up to 2 MBPD & that it's half full now. Given the lack of shipping available, that means actual delivery of Alaskan crude can grow no greater than 1 MBPD.
Yawn
My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.Plantagenet wrote:The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou.Tanada wrote:The real question that should be asked is, what impact has the development of Prudhoe Bay fields had on the wildlife? Secondly is that level of impact acceptable for ANWR development?
If the answer is minimal and acceptable then drill, if the answers are otherwise then don't drill.
My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.
Dwindling Oil Production Threatens To Blow The Trans-Alaska Pipeline by Joe Weisenthal, Dec. 27, 2009:
The 800-mile long trans-Alaska pipeline -- a key artery in our national oil infrastructure -- is on the verge of collapse owing to the decreased production out of Alaska's North Slope.
As with other key components of oil infrastructure, the pipeline does not do well then the flow slows to a trickle. Underutilization is a major problem.
The Seattle-Tacoma News Tribune (via The Oil Drum) has an interesting report on the situation there. …
larry00 wrote:That will ensure ANWR which all ten people who have been there say is a Mosquito infested desolate place
I thinl that is also true about all the phantom offshore areas. If there was much oil in those places it would have been developed years ago.frankthetank wrote:Larry-I have the feeling that it would have been drilled long ago if it was economically feasible and existed in great enough amounts. I have nothing against drilling up there... drill away!
I thinl that is also true about all the phantom offshore areas. If there was much oil in those places it would have been developed years ago.
eastbay wrote:Has anyone considered saving it for later? Or are we all on the same page wanting to burn it all up as fast as we can?
Schadenfreude11 wrote:I would be satified if we just even made an effort to use oil more intelligently.
hillsidedigger wrote:My first response to this is the caribou's predators must have been run off so upsetting the predastor-prey cycle and that is not good.Plantagenet wrote:The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou.Tanada wrote:The real question that should be asked is, what impact has the development of Prudhoe Bay fields had on the wildlife? Secondly is that level of impact acceptable for ANWR development?
If the answer is minimal and acceptable then drill, if the answers are otherwise then don't drill.
hillsidedigger wrote:"The Prudhoe Bay caribou herd tripled in size after development of the Prudhoe Bay oilfield and pipeline. Oil field development actually appears to be good for Alaskan Caribou."
That sounds like a statement of Sarah Palin.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests