toolpush,
I believe al-Jazeera is the reason the Saudis aren't talking to Qatar, or a good big part of it.
ROCKMAN wrote:Pusher - And it would be good for folks to realize that any region that has to ramp up it's drilling/frac'ng infrastructure to exploit their shales will have to spend 5X to 8X on that initial infrastructure investment as it would spend of the yearly capex budget. IOW it costs a lot more to build a drill rig and a fleet of frac trucks then it costs to drill and complete a several years worth of wells. Without a truly massive initial investment in infrastructure no country on the planet can duplicate what has happened with the US shales even if they are lucky enough to have comparable reservoirs.
ROCKMAN wrote:
A NG shale well begins declining as soon as it comes on. So the answer to your question is really a function of how many NG shales wells will be drilled in future and, more important, how quickly they will be drilled and at what production rate they come on at. That combines geologic limits and economic limits. And the geologic limits are a function of economics. Which is why so many "experts" use "technically recoverable reserve" estimates because they don't have a clue as to how much will be worth producing in the future.
Just consider the boom time in the Haynesville Shale play before 2009. While at Devon we had 18 rigs drilling in the play when NG peaked above $12/mcf. And then prices cratered very quickly. When it fell below $6.50/mcf the panic began. When prices fell further they cancelled the contracts on 14 of those 18 rigs and paid $40 million in penalties to do so. So in essence Hubbert's approach has no application to shale NG IMHO. It also has little application to predicting future production from undiscovered or even new discovered plays whether they are conventional or unconventional.
Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests