Cog wrote:I understand your concepts all too well. You are hypocritical with them. You want a progressive consumption tax that will fall most heavily on the 10%. You don't care that the other 90% of the population will be immune to this tax. For them, you don't care if they breed like rabbits and consume even more resources in your over-heated world.
You are out to get the rich no matter how you have to go about it. They are the problem in your world, not the other 90%. But its not socially acceptable to get rid of the 90%, so you pick the target that is not popular. The 10%. So cut to the chase and simply kill the 10% and all of your problems will be solved.
You voted for Obama twice didn't you? That is a simple yes or no question. You also voted for Hillary didn't you?
KaiserJeep wrote:OS, face up to the conumdrum: the basic problem we have is too many humans on one planet. Excessive atmospheric carbon dioxide is a symptom of human overpopulation.
Newfie wrote:4 apartment building in center city Philly.
Newfie wrote:Quite the contrary, people will flock in to beat high gas costs.
Now when the ghetto goes up in smoke, then things get interesting.
But I’m not worried as much about high fuel prices as a sudden financial collapse. Who knows how that will play out.
KaiserJeep wrote:
The possession of almost unlimited wealth is a PROBLEM, pure and simple, when it breeds contempt for our laws.
Return to Environment, Weather & Climate
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 151 guests