pstarr wrote:"Uppsala Gang?" You apparently coined this term. It is derogatory and does not contribute to this discussion.
Copy cat. Started a new thread yet?
pstarr wrote:"Uppsala Gang?" You apparently coined this term. It is derogatory and does not contribute to this discussion.
shortonsense wrote:-Maybe. Maybe not. The "Uppsala Gang" just put out their own estimate of only 0.5% decline in total liquids a year through 2030.
You do mean Shortonsense dont you? I dont see Shortonoil in the last ten pages here or so??? Just curious. Shortonoil does not deserve that rap IMHO.kpeavey wrote:I'm getting older, less tolerant, more cranky, and my blood sugar is probably low. I just dont have the patience for Expletive deleted. that I used to have. In all the years I've been around this forum, I've only set one other user on IGNORE.
Shortonoil will be the 2nd. Stick that feather in your cap.
He is just an attention Objectionable text deleted., he picks faux controversial positions and argues them to garner attention. Notice how often he derails threads with the same old pish? There is no fundamental logic or progression to his arguments.kpeavey wrote:I'm getting older, less tolerant, more cranky, and my blood sugar is probably low. I just dont have the patience for Expletive deleted. that I used to have. In all the years I've been around this forum, I've only set one other user on IGNORE. Shortonsensel will be the 2nd. Stick that feather in your cap.
My wife even after 3 kids has that kind of figure, and trust me, I give her the attention. The only things that really seem to be up for debate is the amount that undeveloped-discovered and undiscovered oil & gas fields can bring to offset the decline in existing fields.mos6507 wrote:If Shorty had that sort of figure he'd deserve the attention.
shortonsense wrote:Maybe. Maybe not. The "Uppsala Gang" just put out their own estimate of only 0.5% decline in total liquids a year through 2030.
Colin in 1989 was predicting about 3.5%. Guess who is the most famous resident of the Uppsala Gang, and is like 85% more optimistic?
Its those crazy Swede's!!Keith_McClary wrote:Did you mean to say "pessimistic"? Do you mean this "Uppsala Gang"? :
Jotapay wrote:I can't believe this. I've never seen Time cover a story this fast before, especially one that is so fringe as Peak Oil. This was no whistleblower. It was planned.
Peak Oil has been co-opted now by the MSM and TPTB to push their own agenda. Peak Oil is going to be used to push the carbon/CO2/environment treaty. Your thunder has just been stolen.
Voice_du_More wrote:
And no I am not drunk. I no longer drink enough to ever be drunk. No drugs either, it clouds the mind.
Shame. It's not written on parchment so I know it can be a little hard to get the word pictures.davep wrote:Shame. At least you would have had an excuse. I can't make head nor tail of your post.
What was it meant to mean though? It just seemed like a weird rant. A calm explanation would be useful for us eejits...Voice_du_More wrote:Shame. It's not written on parchment so I know it can be a little hard to get the word pictures.
Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests