I ask you to consider this. The muslim world is rife with contradictions. On the one hand, it purports ot be revolutionary yet on the other, no sooner does a radical muslim political grouping seize power, 3 things occur:
1 An arrangement is arrived with at the West whereby the muslim region or country in question continues its former role of being a commodities producer/aid dependancy (The Taliban following the overthrow of Socialist Afghanistan....extensive information on this on Google) whilst deferring to the leadership of Britain and the States in all things financial; and Japan and Germany for all things industrial. No real effort is made to really challenge the capitalist paradigm established by Britain and refined by America. In fact, radical Islam was a leading and enthusiastic participant in dethroning the only real challenge there has been to Anglo-Saxon hegemony, the USSR and it did so with
twice the venom it displays in its "conflict" with the West.
2 Old forms of exploitation are reinstated especially gender based forms;
3 Islamic society is held in a technological aspic as the leadership of Islamic countries defer to capitalism for skills and expertise. Islam's greatest modern day achievement is rather abysmal at a few nuclear devices. Otherwise it is utterly dependant on the Anglo-Saxon paradigm for its bread and butter existence.
Is this the great Pretender to the throne of global leadership? Words are cheap. The Islamic mind is backward and confused. The Islamic leadership are the reactionary scum Marx quite rightly warned us about.
Taghayee wrote:"but the primitive muslim mind would simply not grasp the fundamentals of complex capitalist forms and its substance"
do you know any history? anything aside from posing you little poser?