by BigTex » Fri 30 May 2008, 13:30:48
The unhappy fact is that I fear there is a genetic flaw in our basic design--we are too smart for an unenlightened creature.
Looking at things from a very long term perspective, it should be quite obvous that our form of life is not long for this world. If we are down to trying to avert disaster on a year to year or decade to decade basis, it's already over.
Look at the creatures that endure--they are well adapted to their habitat, there is a mechanism for their population to avoid overshoot and they are able to survive changes to their enrivonment through adaptability.
We thought it was a good day when we conquered our predators and left our natural habitat in favor of an artificial one of comfort. In fact, it was not a good day at all. It was the beginning of the end.
We are not virtual beings. We inhabit a finite world and yet we have developed the part of our mind that is dazzled by the infinite to an unhealthy degree. As interesting as ideas can be, you can't eat them. Unfortunately, this reality is not really driven home until you get hungry and try to fill your tummy with an idea.
It's interesting how the "idea" of OVERSHOOT is really a way of exposing the weakness of excessive faith in ideas.
Suspect #1: The idea that exponential growth in a world of finite resources could continue for more than a few hundred years. What then? Plantations and mining operations on Jupiter's moons? Hmm. Interesting idea.