garyp wrote:I get the feeling this idea is to draw attention away from the failure to mandate better standards on business and commercial users.
TommyJefferson wrote:If enough people desire TV's that don't waste expensive electricity, manufacturers will provide them.
That's the beauty of the free market. No gun-backed coersion via nanny-state legislation needed.
aflurry wrote:TommyJefferson wrote:If enough people desire TV's that don't waste expensive electricity, manufacturers will provide them.
That's the beauty of the free market. No gun-backed coersion via nanny-state legislation needed.
wow. that is beautiful.
the free market should come up with a mascot like the easter bunny or santa claus. like maybe a little pixie elf called the "rational consumer" that runs around in a sparkly world filled with rainbows leading to magical pots of perfect products.
that would make it even beautifuler.
SoothSayer wrote:Microsoft are SO stuffed!
TommyJefferson wrote:If enough people desire TV's that don't waste expensive electricity, manufacturers will provide them.
That's the beauty of the free market. No gun-backed coersion via nanny-state legislation needed.
Concerned wrote:I think there is far more energy to be saved with insulation, full or partial solar heating of water and smaller houses than the dreaded standby button.
gg3 wrote:I'm highly intrigued by the finding from the recent research study, that psilocybin appears to increase individuals' sense of *patience*.
gg3 wrote:Bingo! Soothsayer is right on target: "...we burned electricity to do precisely NOTHING."
All for the sake of not having to wait twenty seconds whilst the telly warms up. Twenty seconds!
rogerhb wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to use TV frame code chips that detect the content-type of a TV image to stop a video from recording adverts....
All TV frames are broadcast with a few bits that say whether it's new, entertainment, adverts etc.....
Return to Conservation & Efficiency
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests